Beyond the Cusp

December 3, 2015

What Israel Should Have Learned in the Twenty First Century?

 

What has made the Twenty-First Century interesting is that there have been eight years under the Republicans and eight years under a Democrat; so there can be a fair and even comparison between the two parties when they hold the White House. What is frightening is that despite the talking lines appear quite different; the actual policy execution is not all that different. Both party’s Presidents, Georgy W. Bush and Barack Hussein Obama, had a target of Israel returning to the 1949 Armistice Lines and splitting Jerusalem leaving the Temple Mount in Arab hands or under international agents who will flee surrendering the entirety of the Temple Mount to Arab hands and closed to Jews just as it was for the horrifically disappointing nineteen to twenty years under Jordanian control when Israelis and Jews in general were very disappointed to not be able to visit the historic areas starting with the Temple Mount plus literally thousands of historic sites from Jericho, Hevron, Bethlehem, Shechem, and innumerous other locations where our history laid out in numerous manuscripts both Jewish as well as numerous other historic manuscripts of almost every major empire which tread the lands of the crux meeting place for three continents, Asia, Africa and Europe. The Jews had histories with the Egyptians, the Hittites, the Babylonians, the Canaanites, the Assyrians, the Persians, The Greeks, The Romans, the Byzantines, the Crusaders, the Spanish, the Caliphate, the Golden Age of Islam, the Umayyad Caliphate, the Abbasid Caliphate, the Ayyubid Dynasty, and eventually the British for a total of twenty-nine years. When the British left the land of Israel, which declared its independents on the evening of May 14, 1948, though the world claims Israel became a nation immediately after midnight of May 15, 1948, with her border as depicted below, the state was born.

 

 

Eretz Yisroel the Israel Solution to Problems is One State Solution with Citizenship for Anybody Who Desires Living in Peace with Equal Rights Responsibilities and Worshiping as One Pleases

Eretz Yisroel the Israel Solution to Problems is One State Solution with Citizenship for Anybody Who Desires Living in Peace with Equal Rights Responsibilities and Worshiping as One Pleases

 

 

The Arab Armies of Jordan, Egypt, Saudi Arabia, Lebanon, Syria, Yemen, the Free Palestinian Arab Army, countless other Arab formations which existed inside Arab villages which attacked Israeli forces from behind which resulted in the entire population of that village being expelled in order to protect the Israeli Defense Forces from rear attacks from the citizens from the village which launched the initial assault. Such reactions were the reason that Israel was accused of forcing some Arab villages to be sent beyond the soldiers in order to leave a safe front without rear forces attacking during any battles. These were the Arabs who Israel evicted from within their lines solely for tactical reasons. The Arabs who either fought with the Israeli Jews or remained as noncombatants were left and could choose whether they remained in Israel and become Israeli citizens and remained as Israeli citizens and today enjoy full citizenship. Unfortunately, Israel did not win the war as is taught in history. Israel survived the war of Jewish genocide but lost lands to Jordan, parts of Judea and Samaria; to Syria, the Golan Heights; and Egypt the Gaza Strip. This was named the Israeli War of Independence which was done by the Israelis because the odds were such that they had little if any chance of winning according to every tactician. Israel had almost no armor or aircraft, no navy and unbelievably few trained soldiers and only a few experienced officers who fought in the British Palestinian Brigades which were almost one-hundred-percent Jewish as the Jews were called Palestinian by the British and most other Europeans and the Arabs were simply called Syrians. This became evident when the Mandate system was enacted with the British given control of what the Arabs referred to as southern Syria while the French were assigned the area including Syria and Lebanon. When the two areas of Syria were divided into two different zones, the Arabs of southern Syria referred to this as the Naqba. The current meaning of Naqba being the founding of Israel is a misnomer as the real Naqba the Arabs related to was the dividing of Syria into two separate Mandates and as the Arabs in the British Mandate thought they would not be permitted to cross into Syria, especially Damascus, which was entirely false but we all know how rumors get a life of their own once they are born. The resultant loss of territory loss left Israel tactically weakened as they no longer had the Jordan River and the Jordan River Valley as their eastern border and only held half of Jerusalem and lost the high ground of the Golan Heights. The new map which was tendered as an armistice line and not a final border, something which has never been settled completely for the entire existence of Israel, left Israel defensively vulnerable as is obvious from the map below.

 

 

Occupied Israel where Syria Occupied the Golan Heights While Egypt Occupied the Gaza Strip and Jordan Occupied Judea and Samaria They Renamed West Bank

Occupied Israel where Syria Occupied the Golan Heights While Egypt Occupied the Gaza Strip and Jordan Occupied Judea and Samaria They Renamed West Bank

 

 

What is absolutely ridiculous is the drive by both George W Bush and Barak Hussein Obama were equal in their demands that Israel surrender the remainder of the West Bank as the surrendering of the Gaza Strip worked out so wonderfully. The retreat from the Litany River in Lebanon back to the so-called Blue Line allowed Hezballah to occupy the territories vacated and able to build a sizeable threat with well over a quarter of a million missiles poised and targeting Israel. So now both the mainstream Democrats and mainstream Republicans both agree that this make-believe people who are, accurately put, Arabs from southern Syria and not in any manner or way Palestinians as there has never in all of history been a people called Palestinians. They stole the concept of a Naqba redefining it to fit their particular situation. There have been other things that are the result of Mahmoud Abbas’s paranoia about losing any election despite having his own inner circle counting the ballots that should he appear to be reelected the Arabs would likely rise up and demand clean elections. Currently nobody has attempted to challenge Abbas about his remaining in office for over a decade since elections were supposedly to have been held around 2008 at the least. But Abbas continues to remain in office and rule unchallenged as he has decided he is going to be President for life. He has always made sure his picture is taken at attending every event no matter how inappropriate. One such event was the solidarity for the victims in the shootings of Charlie Hebdo and the Hyper Cacher kosher market where he shoved his way to assure that he was in the front when pictures were taken. His smile when the picture was taken shows how he had no compunction or true sympathy as all Mahmoud Abbas desired was to get his smirking face in a picture of heads of real nations all showing great deference for those who laid with their lives, both the Charlie Hebdo and the Hyper Cacher kosher market. See below,

 

 

Mahmoud Abbas smirking while at remembrance rally for Charlie Hebdo in Paris after terror slaughter of a dozen writers and cartoonists for the satirical magazine.

Mahmoud Abbas smirking while at remembrance rally for Charlie Hebdo in Paris after terror slaughter of a dozen writers and cartoonists for the satirical magazine.

 

 

Mahmoud Abbas simply plays a conglomerate consisting of equal parts jackal, jester, prankster Loki, hyena, Typhoid Mary, Freddy Krueger, and Bride of Frankenstein while always remaining the nemesis to all that is holy. He is the bad dream from which one awakes in a panic that cannot be exorcised. The one trait Mahmoud Abbas retains no matter what is passing by with time; he refuses to accept and deal which falls short of the elimination of Israel replaced by Palestine and the Jews of Israel all murdered. That has worked in Israel’s favor and been the real bane to all who seek to end the conflict by having two states living side by side in peace and security. Abbas cannot count to two, he deals solely in absolutes where he sees the eventuality of the world forcing all the Jews to reside elsewhere, preferably somewhere other than Earth, and then he would claim that the Palestinians were the indigenous civilization on that planet and demand that all its continents and oceans be given immediately to his Palestinian Arabs as they are too cramped on the state they have on Earth. Simply stated, he wants everything the Jews have built and even that will not do. There are some lessons from the surrender of Gaza which need be remembered before considering what would please Abbas.

 

Lesson one: both Republican and Democrat Presidents take the standings advised by the Arabist and anti-Semitic State Department which blames Israel for all the troubles everywhere but particularly in the Arab/Israeli Conflict.

Lesson two: Abbas does not desire peace because the world has continued to lavish him with monies making him excessively wealthy.

Lesson three: Mahmoud Abbas is filled with hatred beyond what anyone from the Western World can even begin to understand.

Lesson four: Abbas has been playing the world just as Arafat had before him basking in the attention taking the podium to mostly expound broad lies which he knows the Western Leaders, especially those in Europe will swallow whole as truisms which define the conflict.

Lesson five: The world does not really care about the Jews or especially Israel and the fact that they have not forced the Jews to relocate to Madagascar or Antarctica.

Lesson six: The left and left center but not necessarily the far left or Arab Parties are in agreement with the Right Center and Religious Zionists that no more land should be surrendered to Abbas and the Arabs.

Lesson seven: When Israel surrendered Gaza whole leaving for the Arabs a multi-billion dollar a year industry worth of greenhouses which were within two days completely scavenged for parts to make rockets and other destruction done simply because the greenhouses did not represent an industry or opportunity, they represented the Jews and as such needed to be demolished.

Lesson eight: The Arab youth over the last twenty-two years have been raised on a steady diet in schools, at camps, soccer leagues, media and almost every place they turn with Jew hatred such that on key phrases they will riot, attack with knives or whatever they can lay their hands upon as is happening right now with the knifings and this indoctrination has spread into the Israeli Arab youth.

 

 

These are the truths which need be introduced to the equations being used to calculate what step might prove successful in ending the conflict. The reality is that the only workable solution is for one side to win out and the other to be vanquished. Either the land will be all Israel or all Arab and the Jews granted other location to turn into a green and wondrous place while the land which was Israel returning to a forsaken land as it will not produce for the Arabs, never has in the past and never will in the future. Look over the entirety of empires including the Greeks and Romans, the Caliphates and Ottoman Empires and none could make the land grow and produce without the Jews. Hashem made a land where only his children, as in the Jews, would be permitted to reap the bountiful promises of the land. So, which will it be, a productive Jewish state or another agricultural and technical wilderness bereft of even the simplest worthwhile ventures be they farms, technology, medicine, physics etc…

 

Beyond the Cusp

 

November 26, 2015

The Israel Problem is, in Reality, No Problem at All

 

There have been glorious calls in Europe and I am sure elsewhere for the nations of the Western World to combine their resources in order to address the situation which is the Islamic State or ISIS. They call for the first stage to be an all-out diplomatic assault to deny ISIS its Raison D’être thus drying up much of their attraction and ability to draw more fighters, especially fighters from the West. This sounds like a great start though it would likely be a lot more productive to initiate a twenty-four-seven bombing campaign for about three weeks or for however long it would take to put a half million armed forces in Jordan and both northern and southern Iraq. Then the bombing should be slowly rolled back as armored divisions and artillery took up close combat support with the heavy battle tanks moving forward supported by A-10 Warthogs flying close air support taking out any ISIS battle tank or armor that dared to move or appeared to be being utilized as an entrenched artillery piece half buried in a sand berm. Needless to say, infantry, preferable armored infantry would follow up whenever ground forces required such and support the infantry with the Apache AH-64 attack helicopters. But that is not what the great minds of Europe and probably much of the minds not so great from the White House and their co-conspirators in the Congress and elsewhere. No, they have a much different approach which will likely place them on the same side of ISIS when the time comes.

 

You might be wondering but the truth is that these brainiacs honestly believe that the war in Syria, the troubles in Libya, the shootings in Paris, the hotel slaughter and standoff in Mali and virtually every terrorist attack including the first World Trade Center Bombing in 1993 by placing a truck bomb in the underground parking garage which murdered sixty people if memory serves me well. That includes all the major attacks on the western World and I am sure if they were reminded of earlier attacks such as the Lockerbie bombing they would include that as well. There are two they would be correct that were spawned by the cause they have chosen as the highest priority conflict even preceding ISIS in importance to be addressed. Those attacks would be Sirhan Sirhan’s assassination of Robert Kennedy and the assassination of the American Ambassador Cleo A. Noel Jr., in Sudan, 1973, as both were committed relating to the Arab/Palestinian-Israeli conflict with Ambassador Noel’s murder officially ordered by Yasser Arafat, and the CIA has the recording of his approval to go ahead with the planned assassination from his office in Ramallah, and Sirhan Sirhan confessed that the reason he assassinated Robert Kennedy was due to Kennedy’s support for Israel. The rest are all related by the thinnest of threads with the only one in common being they were committed on planet Earth in the Sol solar system in the Milky Way during its expansion.

 

You have probably guessed by now, but the brainiacs of Europe have claimed that in order to fight ISIS the main causality behind ISIS has to be first resolved, the Arab-Israeli or Israeli-Palestinian conflict. Israel must be pressed to form a Palestinian State of Palestine with borders with which Mahmoud Abbas and the rest of the leadership of the Palestinians demand. Israel must be put to the task of making sure the State of Palestine is economically viable and has all the resources and opportunities for said success. The wherewithal to complete this transfer of land and arranging the accords to bring permanent peace must begin with Israel surrendering all of the lands beyond the Green Line and the half of Jerusalem which was taken, never will they say the truth of liberated from illegal Jordanian occupation, during the 1967 Six Day War. This would include all and any access to the Jerusalem holy sites in Palestinian hands and thus the Jews would be giving away for more than land, they would be surrendering places too precious to even begin to put a price upon. This would cause a problem that the Europeans must be overlooking, right? Well, let’s look at that.

 

 

Left Side Depicts World's View of Two States While Right Side Depicts Abbas' and Arabs' view of Two State Where Jewish State is Dispersed Throughout Europe America and Western Nations

Left Side Depicts World’s View of Two States,
While Right Side Depicts Abbas’ and Arabs’ view
of Two State Where Jewish State is Dispersed
Throughout Europe America and Western Nations

 

 

The map on the left depicts what is seen as the areas as they were before the six Day War. They also represent what many allow their readers and the uninformed to believe this is the division of lands the Palestinian desire as they had it stolen from them in the Six Day War. The Problem is that there was no such state as the “West Bank”, actually Judea and Samaria, were occupied by Jordan illegally taken from the State of Israel during the War for Jewish Annihilation of 1948-9 where Israel lost much of Judea and Samaria to Jordan and Gaza to Egypt. Jordan renamed the areas they stole as West Bank as Judea and Samaria sounded too Jewish. The world has adopted the Jordanian names because Judea and Samaria sounded too Jewish. The world does this also so they can claim the lands are occupied by Israel when the reality is the lands were occupied by Jordan who gifted their claim to the lands they occupied to the PLO and Yasser Arafat almost a year after they made their peace with Israel. That became important after 1993 as without that claim to the land there would have been no Oslo Accords signed in September of 1993 and no Palestinian-Israeli conflict, just an Arab-Israeli conflict. The reason there is a difference was the illegal possession of the lands was transferred in claim to the PLO and Yasser Arafat after Jordan surrendered the occupied lands of Judea and Samaria to Israel in their peace accord. So Jordan surrendered the Jordanian occupied Israeli lands they stole in 1948-9 back to Israel in their peace treaty and then transferred their bogus claim over lands they no longer possessed and had returned to their rightful owner when peace was reached and treaty signed to the PLO so that there could be a claim by an Arab entity and the Arab-Israeli conflict could still claim the lands occupied by Jordan and Egypt in 1948-9 thus threatening Israel even further and potentially have the same borders they had in 1967 should there ever be a next Arab-Israeli war.

 

This is important because the Jordan River and the Jordan Valley make a perfect defensive position which would be extremely effective against any ground assault and thus are strategically necessary for the defense of Israel. Reading any United Nations or other peace proposal or means of settlement of the conflict there are two main items which came from immediately after the Six Day War when Israel held the Golan Heights, Judea and Samaria, Gaza which combined are far less significant than the Sinai Peninsula which Israel also held. The proposed peace demanded that Israel return lands, not all lands, not a significant amount of lands, not anything defined except by the following, and retains those lands considered important for the safety and security of the state of Israel. There were military authorities who mostly argued whether Israel would thus retain all of the land because the Suez Canal made a natural defensive barrier while others claimed the central mountain in the Sinai might make a fair place to draw a defensive line and thus Israel would retain the eastern lands and the central highlands while Egypt would receive the western plains of the Sinai. That was pretty much the debate except for the occasional question over the Golan Heights, some land the Syrians demanded be returned, after all, how could the Syrians shoot at Israeli farmers in the central Galilee without holding the Golan Heights, their hunting season would be greatly deteriorated if they lost this defensive high-ground. Tacticians never gave such a second thought, Israel required retaining the highlands and the crests on both sides of the Golan Heights, those were definitely remaining with Israel. That leaves Gaza, which was out of the question if Israel, according to many discussions, was to retain any of the Sinai, and the so-called West Bank, which was remarkably never brought into any discussion, Israel would require all of Judea and Samaria returned for a multitude of reasons, these were lands sworn to be a part of the Jewish State under numerous treaties many stemming directly from the San Remo Conference and the Balfour Declaration which was accepted word-for-word into the Mandate Documents for the varied Mandates and especially the British Mandate and into the San Remo Conference as the guiding document for their decisions concerning a Jewish State. This did not prevent the British from taking seventy-eight-percent and gifting it to the Arabs under the rule of the Hashemites to which the British owed some recognition and lands for their assistance in the Great War. So the Jewish State would have to do with the remaining twenty-two-percent of the lands which were divided along the Jordan River with the Jews forming their State on the lands west of the Jordan River, all the lands west of the Jordan River.

 

Still, some might see the map on the left as an equitable solution except this is not the minimalist demand of the Palestinian leadership; they have a different map in mind. Mahmoud Abbas has made this absolutely clear; he will only accept the map on the right. That is the big problem, Abbas, as Arafat before him, wants all the lands and the Jews removed by any means necessary, even if that means another genocidal six-million-plus Jews slaughtered. So, looking at the map on the left and then the map on the right and realizing the area named Gaza and West Bank are what they hold and are demanding the lands depicted on the right as their minimalist demands, how do the Israelis debate a peace accord with such people who are in total denial of reality. The paradigm for this discussion needs to change and reflect the reality, all the lands west of the Jordan River are defined as Israel and anything gifted the Arabs, who laughingly call themselves Palestinians, is generosity beyond measure and far beyond any reward their actions, threats, murderous fantasies and treachery deserve. What their actions do deserve is to be wiped from the lands in much the same manner they would implement for the Jews given equal advantage as shared by Israel who has not so dealt with these adult delinquents. The reality need be explained to the reprehensible, terroristic sociopaths that the land is truly occupied lands and that they are the occupiers whom Israel would be well within their rights to remove by any means required. If that is beyond their ability to grasp, I have an easier way of explaining this, this is our land and you, our terror stricken adversary and blemish on our lands, are the occupiers of our land and simply put, what part of

 

 

Am Yisrael Chai
(עם ישראל חי)

 

 

do you not understand?

 

Beyond the Cusp

 

November 11, 2015

Realities of the Settler Building Freeze

 

The building freeze has implications and aims at changing the status-quo set up by the Oslo Accords. It is the stipulation in the Oslo Accords which has forced Mahmoud Abbas to declare that the Arabs are no longer restrained by the Oslo Accords and are now simply moving on to restoring the entirety of Palestine which is from the (Jordan) River to the (Mediterranean) Sea. There are many claims and less than honest denunciations concerning the map and the allotments and definitions demarking how the lands were to be shared and divided. So, let us dive into some of the reasoning and include some of the misconceptions and outright lies about the divisions agreed upon at the setting of the Oslo Accords as they were originally negotiated and even at a second conference which fine-tuned the agreement so as to address some of the Arab complaints and adjusting for Arab demands to remedy what they claimed were unfair provisions which the Israelis had ‘forced’ them to agree with and signing the original Oslo Accords treaty. One thing to keep in mind is that when the Oslo Accords were being hammered out and originally written and agreed upon as well as the amendments were added and adjustments made the Arab leadership top two positions were held by Yasser Arafat with Mahmoud Abbas right next to him. True, they had others who did most of the negotiating and other excuses but it was under their watch that the Oslo Accords and Oslo II were negotiated and had Yasser Arafat signed along numerous others as it often goes at these ceremonial signing events before the media. The select thrust is that the entirety of the Oslo Accords negotiations were agreed upon by Arafat and Abbas holding the top positions which means that Abbas’s complaints over the past number of years which have led to his discarding any constraints imposed by the Oslo Accords was all part of the scheme to completely lose Oslo and replace it with the propaganda that has been carefully orchestrated such that the impressions by the media and much of the United Nations as well as the European Union, United States, the Arab League, all the MENA nations, the Quarter and just about everyone else one might think of including believing that the entirety of Judea and Samaria were always intended to be the borders for the Arab state to be carved out of lands which were reserved solely for the Jewish state but some promises are more important than others just as all animals are created equal but some animals are more equal than others. The discussion will be basing our expiations upon will be using the map below which comes to us credit of the United Nations all for the sake of accuracy.

 

 

Oslo Accords Division of Judea and Samaria into Areas A, B & C where A & B were Arab and C and Military Zones were Israeli as per the United Nations (this is their map)

Oslo Accords Division of Judea and Samaria into
Areas A, B & C where A & B were Arab and
C and Military Zones were Israeli as per the
United Nations (this is their map)

 

 

The first feature which probably grabbed your attention early on was that large grey area along the eastern or right side of the map. This area was and always has been an area separated from considerations as it was designated as a military requirement for Israeli security which was supposedly guaranteed such that Israel could have a solid defense from any ground offensive coming from the east, not something out of the question with the Islamic State near to this exact area with solely Jordan to potentially prevent their access and additionally there are currently thousands of Jordanians demonstrating and demanding that Jordan abrogate the treaty with Israel as the first step to declaring a war and destroying the Jewish state. The area serves as an early warning system to use radar, visual and other detection capabilities to intercept air attacks such as aircraft and missiles. This is a reality and even more so after the Iran treaty has left a legal path to nuclear weapons and an even bigger threat that Iran might not be all that patient and ignore the restrictions and start or continue a clandestine operation and reach not only nuclear break out capability but to actually build a respectfully sufficient nuclear weapons stockpile where they could feel adequately safe in launching a nuclear attack. This was the requirement and this area even to today has limited civilian locations with the exception of around Jericho.

 

The next obvious problem which needs explanation is why the light yellow areas are snakelike and separating the Arab denoted areas into smaller areas which to the innocent eye would be doing exactly what Mahmoud Abbas has endlessly complained about, dividing the Arab areas into bantus. The areas were not imposed randomly simply to chop off neighbors from friends or farmers from their fields or any such propaganda. The Palestinians are allowed to use these roads and cross the roads as are the Israelis, but Israel is responsible for the security and safe usage of the roadways and as Israel is also tasked to provide protection from all forms of attack be it terror, invasion or other attacks both foreign and domestic, logic dictates that Israel have free access to the main roads and other vital areas which provide military or civil advantages both for support, logistics and tactical necessities. This was also demanded to serve Israeli security, this time as a way to control terrorism which also made necessary being permitted to place checkpoints in some locations in a permanent basis while also having roaming and special checkpoints all depending on situational awareness or specific intelligence. If there had been no terror attacks, no bombings, no rock throwing or other threats, this division would still be necessary as Israel being responsible for protection from foreign invasion, these main highways and roads would also be absolutely necessary for a rapid and effective response. The rest of the grey area mixed into other areas would be where Israel ‘settlements’ already existed or had been planned by the time the Oslo Accords had been proposed and ratified. Remember that these maps were agreed upon by the Arab side, but when you have no intention of ever reaching an agreement and only wanted to gain any foothold from which to use propaganda, media bias, misinformation, and outright lies, then maps denoting intended areas assigned for division of settlements are meaningless.

 

What does any map defining an intermediate starting stage mean to those whose idea of the eventual and fair and equitable result is the complete eradication of the other side, complete subjugation, if not eradication of the other side; as the only permissible result which would preordained by the god of your religion would not allow for anything less. The world has done an unbelievable job of once again making a promise to the Jews and the Zionists, then and after the it was deal decided that their promises were meaningless as soon as it became possible to find some promising way to potentially destroy Israel and remove the Jewish state, if not the Jews as a whole, from the face of the earth. The first was after the Balfour Declarations being adopted by the League of Nations at the San Remo Conference which called for the entirety to be used for the Jewish state providing that the local peoples were allowed freedom of religion, societal freedoms and freedom to self-rule in their day to day lives with the Jewish population being responsible for international relations and defending the state. It took less than two years after the adoption of the Treaty of Sèvres when the British came up with the next promise, or should we term it a lie when they guaranteed that if the Zionists permitted the lands east of the Jordan River to be used for an Arab state which would be the homeland for the Arabs of the area leaving all of the lands west of the Jordan River to be used as the Jewish state. This promised that the division was the final compromise would have left the map as depicted in the next map, very much the map the most ardent Zionist nationalist who may foolishly believe the world was telling the truth with the Transjordan (Jordan) promises.

 

 

British Mandate as prescribed division between Arab State of Jordan and Jewish State of Israel

British Mandate as prescribed division between Arab State of Jordan and Jewish State of Israel

 

 

The building freeze which had become the mainstay of President Obama, Secretary of State Kerry and of course the Arabs and the European Union has a very nefarious effect on any eventual decision. The term which corresponds directly to the building freeze and that is facts on the ground. Facts on the ground are claimed to be the main determination for what lands and areas are controlled by the Arabs and the Israelis. With the Israelis refused the right to build anything the Arabs can build neighborhoods even those surrounding and close in to the existing Jewish neighborhoods such that as they cut them off from any major highway or major thoroughfare they would take control of the entire area including the Jewish communities taking control of them and forcing the Jews out just as Jordan did to the Jews living in Judea and Samaria as well as eastern Jerusalem and the Old City when they occupied these lands taken from Israeli control in the 1948 war to destroy Israel which Israel lost lands to Judea, Samaria and most of Jerusalem to Jordan; the Golan Heights to Syria; and Gaza to Egypt; but Israel survived, which is why they refer to it as their War of Independence when it was actually their war for the right to live; so losing may have been a potential result, but it was never considered a possibility as they could not realize such an occurrence after the horrors they had survived during the Holocaust just a few years earlier. The building freeze is simply a means through which the world can force the Jews to surrender more of Judea and Samaria to the Arab demands and it is looking like this is working as the Europeans have been financing the building of Arab neighborhoods within the areas which were exclusively reserved for Israeli towns and cities as well as within the eastern defensive zone thus also making for a more vulnerable zone. With Arab building being built by Europeans, the claim is that the Arabs are not building in any zone forbidden them, the Europeans are building settlements and cities within Area C and nothing says that the Europeans cannot build there and nothing says they cannot sell these houses and other buildings to Arabs if they choose to do so. Thus the Europeans are simply building cities and settlements and selling them to whomever they choose at an affordable price, somewhere around free. The reality of the insistence by President Obama, and almost a certitude to be continued by President Clinton and potentially Republican President depending on the candidate and more than likely under a President Bernie Sanders who despite being born into a Jewish family had never lost any sleep over Israel, the building freeze may become a permanent certitude. But it may already be too late for there to be any other conclusion but for Israel to surrender everything and displace over one million Jews from their homes, remove entire industrial parks and numerous companies resulting in the loss of thousands upon thousands of Arab jobs as these industries either pack up and give up or rebuild their operations inside Israel across the border, a border completely closed and near impossible for any to cross and this would cost thousands more jobs for those Arabs who currently are allowed into Israel daily for work.

 

There are some ramifications which the world had not quite invested sufficient thought. Once the Arabs are given their state and let us assume for a moment that they gain everything the world believes they desire, despite the reality that the only peace they will accept is the total destruction of Israel with them standing atop the ashes, is that Israel could simply stop all interactions and services with the Arab state. Such is actually unlikely because Israel and her people are struck by a potentially fatal flaw; they are civilized and might be more concerned about the Arabs survival than they do about their own citizens’ energy and water consumer prices. The problem is that Israel provides the vast majority of water and electrical supplies to both Gaza and Judea and Samaria and could very easily stop providing them until the back owed bills be paid as they have been ignored for close to a decade. Then, after the past debts being paid in full, there would be just cause for Israel to demand that for future deliveries of these necessary and vital deliveries be paid for in advance or a significant security deposit be paid equal to an estimated six months estimated bill such that they would have a three month grace period in paying their bills before service would be cut off. Whatever the ramifications, the world is rushing forward playing with fire and believing that nobody will get burned or that they know who will get burned and they are comfortable with who they believe will get burned, but what if they are wrong, dead wrong. Still the world appears dead set on forcing Israel back within the pre-Six Day War borders for reasons many will claim are unknown. We will take a stab at why. First the logic as we work towards our thoughts. In 1948 the German Nazi officers and British officers actually worked side by side in advising the numerous Arab armies from seven nations as they attempted to destroy the nascent state in a war which lasted almost a year and a half and killed one tenth of the Israeli population. Yet somehow Israel survived. In the Six Day War when Egypt, Syria and Jordan with assists from other Arab states all attacked Israel the concept did not include Israel liberating Gaza, Judea, Samaria and the Golan Heights as well as taking control of the Sinai Peninsula. It was more figured that the war would take even less time and the victorious Arab vanquishers favored by Allah would all be dancing in Tel Aviv within three days; things don’t always turn out as planned. In 1973 with complete surprise and most of the army personnel in Synagogue for Yom Kippur and it taking almost six hours before the reserves and regular units could be fielded, Israel ended up on the outskirts of Damascus and much of the way to Alexandria and Cairo after crossing the Suez Canal. After that surprise the Europeans and United States demanded that Israel retreat to the boundaries from which the war began. This defeat showed that if Israel had sufficient logistical depth they were near to invulnerable. This is one of the reasons for pushing Israel into the smallest size possible as the world has learned that they need all the help they can get if they will ever defeat Israel completely and undo what many in Europe and around the world now see as having been a fatal error, allowing the Jews to return to their natural homelands. The rumor was the land was not farmable, not productive and all but cursed with nobody making a go of the lands from the Romans to the present day. They believed the Jews were making a horrid mistake demanding this wasteland. They were wrong as this is the land of milk and honey and has surrendered her bounty to the Jews and will continue to do so. Granted, if the Jews are ever forced from the land it will dry up and refuse to bear its fruits no matter the amount of effort other peoples will attempt to make a go of it as this land and the Jewish people are a match made in Heaven, honest, a match made in Heaven and given that heavenly guarantee which is not transferable to anybody else.

 

Beyond the Cusp

 

« Previous PageNext Page »

Blog at WordPress.com.