Coming of Obama’s Parting Shot @ Israel

 

President Obama, contrary to many leftist American Jews’ commentaries and letters to editors, has a quite high animosity towards Israel which has been evident from his Cairo speech onward. We will grant that we have been experiencing a calmed and quieted President Obama concerning Israel over the summer. That changed this week on the slightest of provocations. Israel announced their intention to continue with a previously announced building of homes in the Jewish community of Shiloh. These homes are being built in order to provide the families whose homes in a nearby community are to be destroyed in response to President Obama and the State Department efforts. Apparently President Obama and the State department desired these Jews be forced from beyond the 1949 Armistice line, the Green Line, and within the indefensible pre June 1967 borders. By the way, the belief that the pre June 1967 borders, the Green Line, being indefensible is not just the Israeli government’s belief but has been the position of numerous American Presidents, Secretary of States, Defense Secretaries and members of the Joint Chiefs of Staff and Pentagon and other Generals. Should Israel ever be forced back within those previous borders the midsection of the country in and around Tel Aviv will be a mere nine miles. Yes, Israel would be pushed into a border with her midsection only nine miles wide which, just for reference, is less than half the width of Washington, D.C. Yet there are rumors that President Obama is planning a last ditch ambush against Israel to punish Netanyahu and Israel for not making his Nobel Peace Prize valid and of having been awarded with valid foresight. The editorials and other commentaries criticizing the Nobel Committee for getting carried away over the election of the first President of the United States of color in their rush to award President Obama with the Nobel Peace Prize had even some within the Nobel Central Committee suggesting that the award be negated in the view of the actual record of President Obama’s Administration. Perhaps this might be President Obama’s effort to validate his being awarded the Nobel Peace Prize on the backs of the safety and possible future of Israel and her people.

 

 

Some have questioned what might be the real harm behind such a United Nations passing of such a resolution. There have been almost countless United Nations General Assembly Resolution and official denunciations from the Human Rights Council against Israel and Israel has survived them all quite nicely even to include the 1975 Zionism as racism General Assembly Resolution which was finally repealed some sixteen years later. Would another meaningless and unenforceable United Nations General Assembly generated piece of paper actually have any deleterious effects on Israel and the day to day life of the average Israeli? Well, that depends on whether what President Obama is intending to pursue is simply a harmless General Assembly Resolution or whether he is intent on something with more weight and potentially even some teeth to the motion. Granted, much of what might be accomplished at the United Nations, especially in the General Assembly where anything anti-Israel has a sort of built in guarantee of passage, would not be all that threatening but that is not what we expect from what we have been capable of gathering and assume from our efforts.

 

President Obama has had the vision of himself as the man who ultimately ended the Israeli-Palestinian Arab conflict and he has been determined since his very first day in the White House when he made his very first official phone call from the Oval Office to Mahmoud Abbas even before calling any actual head of state. There have been unconfirmed rumors about the content of that phone call which White House official commentary has passed off as being cordial but nothing of substance nor should any importance be placed in the call without proof that there were any guarantees or promises of intent communicated. Such a disclaimer reeks of something worth concealing being the reality and we have suspected that President Obama, filled with the grand visions of himself as some great communicator and a special individual with privilege and promise greater than his predecessors did in fact give guarantees to Mahmoud Abbas that he would press forward and bring about the Palestinian State which the President himself believed in his heart was the right and proper thing that was on the right side of history, and we all know President Obama’s sense of importance on things he perceives to be on the right side of history, whether that be the real side or not being unimportant. President Obama has criticized Vladimir Putin for being on the wrong side of history expecting that such a criticism would force President Putin to alter his plans and prevent him from such dangerous actions which would fall on the wrong side of history such as invading the Ukraine or interfering in President Obama’s plans in Syria. This right side of history theme plays a large part in President Obama’s views of the world and he also appears to believe that he has this special ability to judge what is and is not on the right side of history, and a Palestinian State is on his perceived right side of history as has been the Iran Nuclear Deal while Prime Minister Netanyahu is on the wrong side of History.

 

It is our conjecture that President Obama is not planning on a General Assembly Resolution calling for the formation of a Palestinian State with the Green Line as its borders and that all Israeli towns and other structures and settlements are merely unhelpful and undesired as they are preventing the settlement of the conflict. This is mere restating of what he and others have claimed in ever increasing volume and irascibility. President Obama has not given up on settling the conflict in what he views as the correct and properly fair manner which is, of course, the right side of history. As he sees history, Israel was illegally formed and has stolen Palestinian Arab lands as the Jews are a people of ill will; evil, dark hearts who have aggressively strode to steal ever more Arab Palestinian homeland and probably never should have been given the land for their state in 1948 or ever and do not deserve a nation of their own as they are to be punished to roam the world living at the kindness of others whom they repay with spite and poisoning their host’s lands and are accursed by Heaven and are the spawn of Satan. Simply stated, he agreed with every sermon condemning the Jews he ever heard in the Reverend Wright’s Mosque disguised as a church and was a friend and believer with Edward Said, Louis Farrakhan and Rashid Ismail Khalidi. These men were among the fomenters of President Obama’s feud with Israel and desire to destroy Israel through whatever means he was able and he sees that opportunity slipping from his grasp and will take whatever measures he feels will be effective in setting in motion the eventual destruction of Israel and by doing so rid the world of the Jew.

 

So what is it we fear that President Obama will be pursuing and at what point in his remaining weeks should his actions be expected. President Obama cannot act before the election and will remain mute while he will have others deny, deny, deny and deny any accusations no matter what evidence may be presented and will call on some of his “Jewish” friends to defend him such as the leaders of J-Street and friends from academia who share his distaste for Israel. Once the election has passed and the Christmas “Winter” break approaches and congress is ready to run for the hills, or from the Hill, he will arrange for a quiet, low key and unpublicized meeting of the Security Council where only those nations desired will be formally invited with the rest receiving the information of the meeting the night before. President Obama will then have presented a Resolution recognizing the State of Palestine with the Green Line as its borders and East Jerusalem as its Capital City. Where we believe he will actually go so far as to make the proposal a Chapter Seven Resolution which is enforceable by the use of military intervention if any side does not comply appropriately and within a reasonable period of time, he may still be persuaded to simply settle for a Chapter Six Resolution which is a strong and insistent demand which will be accepted by the vast majority of nations, does not allow for the use of military force to enforce the resolution, just economic and other methods including removing embassies and ambassadors, economic sanctions, diplomatic pressures and anything else as long as it remains short of military intervention. The reason he might not call for a Chapter Seven is should Donald Trump have won the election he knows that there would be little if any chance that his resolution no matter its wording would be enforced by the United States which pretty much means it would not be enforced. But should Hillary have won the election, President Obama would be free to go for all the marbles knowing that at worst a President Hillary Clinton would do little if anything to prevent military enforcement and would pretend her hands were tied and implement heavy political and economic pressures including an end to all aid to Israel and perhaps arming Arab forces and provide them with protective air support in forcing Israel to comply with President Obama’s final efforts. This could be done even against the will of Congress providing the efforts did not go beyond the Presidential prerogative for use of force. Going further could bring on charges of impeachment but should there be sufficient Democrat membership in congress, President Hillary Clinton could even ignore all limitations knowing she was safe from being fully impeached by both houses such that even if she were charged she would not be convicted.

 

As far as what could prevent President Obama from taking such actions, the answer is unfortunately, “Nothing.” Should he decide that such would establish for him his rightful place in history, on the right side of history as he sees it, then he will likely do as he sees fit. The minimum would be a simple General Assembly Resolution which would be next to meaningless but still fulfill his promises to see to the recognition of statehood for the Palestinians even despite such an action having no teeth. Such an effort would take little extra action as such a proposed Resolution, as stated before, would breeze through the General Assembly and could be accomplished even if he waited until after the New Year as he has the first three weeks before the inauguration to do as he feels proper and Congress does not return until the week of the inauguration and does not convene until after the inauguration. Anything done in January would be performed without any interference from Congress or ratification from Congress, of course. Congress is unlikely to approve of whatever moves President Obama chooses but that would have little effect on the General Assembly as they have often thumbed their noses at the United States Congress and also the President when it suited their mood of the moment. Any Security Council Resolution would eventually require the confirmation as if a treaty by Congress which would present problems for the United States supporting the action of the American President, even if a ‘lame duck’ in his final moments. Should the Resolution be a Chapter Seven Security Council Resolution then it would most definitively require Congressional ratification just as if it were a treaty, something the Senate would be unlikely to approve. As for what effect that would have on the United Nations Security Council actions is a wholly different kettle of fish. Finally, there is also the possibility that the Security Council Resolution could be introduced by a nation other than the United States and in order to avoid any fallout President Obama could simply have the United States abstain and not work against the resolution knowing that by doing such he would be granting the effort a tacit approval which would influence the other permanent members of the Security Council to at worst also abstain thus allowing it to very probably pass as some of the other members would still support such a measure. There is one other possibility, that of one of the other permanent members using their veto thus ending the resolution and if it were a Chapter Seven Resolution we are willing to bet that is exactly what would be the case. The nations most likely to use their veto might surprise many but we would expect either China or Russia to be the veto wielding savior. So, imagine an American President attempting to use the Security Council of the United Nations to have the world force Israel to surrender all lands gained in the 1967 Six Day War and retreat behind the Green Line and the Russians or the Chinese vetoing the Resolution foiling the efforts of the President of the United States. That would be the ultimate embarrassment and there could be no more fitting manner in which to provide President Obama with the award of being consistently on the wrong side of history in his entire eight years as President.

 

As far as counting on anything to counter any actions intended by President Obama as he got on average three-quarters of the Jewish vote in his two elections if not higher. About the only Jews who can be definitively counted upon to raise the roof are the ZOA (Zionist Organization of America) who will be left talking while the phone has been secured under a cushion and the aide has left the room. There is nothing that the American Jews would even be willing to do as there will be at least as high a percentage voting for Hillary Clinton as voted for President Obama and most of the rest are represented by the ZOA or are Orthodox Jews likely residing in the New York greater metropolitan area and thus their votes even ifnot for Hillary will make little if any difference unless the all but unthinkable happens and New York State becomes a close race and Trump actually has even the slightest of hopes. That is unlikely but we can hope.

 

So what can be done and is it possible? What can be done is risk it all and have Prime Minister Netanyahu call the American Amabassador to his office, have the Israeli Ambassador to the United Nations call the American Ambassador to his office, have the Israeli Ambaddador to the United States call the Secretary of State for an urgent meeting, and if refused, then leave a letter at the White House addressed to the President and hand delivered all with a single message. Should President Obama use the Security Council for any resolution establishing a Palestinian State or declaring the 1949 Armistice Lines as a recognized border, Israel will take action. These lines are also called the Green Line, the one President Obama misnames as the 1967 lines, as they were not established in 1967 but were corrected in 1967. The action Israel would take should the United States seek official recognition of such as a border by the Security Council, would be to establish the Jordan River as the border as it is legally under all international laws including at least one treaty ratified by the United States when stating and signing on to agreements that the San Remo Conference was a valid document and the Treaty of Sèvres and all others based on San Remo are valid in signifying the borders for the Jewish State.

 

This establishment of the proper and legal borders will not permit a single Palestinian to become a citizen immediately and will establish the officers, leaders and security force officers and all of the special forces as personna non grata in Israel and provide them with two weeks to find new living arrangements. All of the Palestinian Security Forces will have forty eight hours to turn in their weapons and each will be reviewed and may potentially be hired for the new police force under Israeli police command. Some may even be granted their former rank and even placed in command positions if they check to have no connections to terrorist entities past or present. Finally, the citizens of the Palestinian Authority will be permitted to remain and will continue to have their businesses, their homes, their jobs if they work for an Israeli owned company, and some employees if requested by companies which relocated within Israel due to the BDS boycotts may be granted work entry permits to return to their former positions should the company so request. After a year there will be decision made as to whether and the procedure that interested Arabs formerly under the Palestinian Authority government will be permitted to start the procedures for Israeli citizenship. Within six months of that date there will be free and open election in the former areas of the Palestinian Authority under Israeli supervision. Former Palestinian Authority citizens will be granted local voting rights in their areas but should they move they will be required to seek Israeli citizenship once a procedure is established before being granted the vote. As the Palestinian Authority citizens will initially be considered alien residents, they will not have rights to vote in Israeli general elections as that will remain reserved for Israeli citizens, including any of the Palestinian Authority Arabs who gain such citizenship. Israel will immediately take over the police and security functions and all radio and television and cable networked shows and start a review to see if they meet with Israeli broadcast regulations and laws before being permitted back on the air. Other problems will be handled as they present themselves and any terrorist activity will be punished by immediate repatriation to their country of origin or any nation they might choose who will accept them even to include the United States.

 

An example might be the Palestinian Authority Registrar for the National Palestinian Committee for Education, Culture and Science who was not only not from the Israeli area but his name tells his nationality as he is from Sudan as the rest of Murad Al-Sudani clan originated. He is the Secretary General as listed on their official site here about half way down the page. He is far from the only officer or person of importance as most of the higher ranking persons, Yasser Arafat and Mahmoud Abbas amongst them, are of foreign origins, another of the dirty little secrets which are constantly denied and all proof ignored by the rest of the world as their desired future lies with an Arab extinguishing of Israel. That alone should have been enough reason for the PLO, Hamas, Islamic Jihad and their gangs be removed and law and order replace the kleptocrats stealing the people blind and sent packing giving peace and real opportunity returned to the decent people of the West Bank and Gaza, and there are a number of decent people who are mostly scared to death and must watch their every utterrance. They deserve better and a fair opportunity for a productive life.

 

Beyond the Cusp

 

Some Ideas Never Die; Such as the Oslo Accords

 

Truly some ideas never die even when they have long passed their use-by-date. The Oslo Accords are one such set of ideas which died the day that President William Jefferson Clinton handed to Yasser Arafat, after beating Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Barak into complete submission, everything he had demanded and Arafat walked out without a word and started the Second Intifada. It was later revealed that Arafat had planned the Second Intifada as the Palestinian answer to not getting their demands at the Camp David negotiations and still insisted that Israeli resistance to a common peace was the reason for the violence. Over a thousand Israelis were murdered and tens of thousands were injured, many with permanent and severe damage from the bombings with bolts and screws lodged permanently next to their spines, hearts and other organs or jammed into their brains all inoperable due to location. Many lost limbs, an eye or both eyes and other disfigurements. The Second Intifada, on top of Arafat refusing to make peace even after his terms were met, defined the situation and should have been the post mortem for the Oslo Accords. Arafat’s understudy and successor, Mahmoud Abbas, has often made clear to any willing to translate his Arabic speeches that the only peace he will allow Israel is the peace of the grave. As the pro-Palestinian protesters throughout Western countries chant ad-nauseam, “From the River to the Sea, Palestine must be free.” The word ‘free’ in this chant has a double meaning, the obvious that all of Israel is Palestine and secondly that every Jew will have been eradicated as Palestine must be Judenrein. Abbas has flatly stated even in English that should they be forced into accepting a shared state beside Israel, it will simply serve as the launching pad for the remainder of the conquest and eradication of the Zionist Entity. Even his saying Israel is difficult for this man and his band of minions.

 

What is truly sad is not only the number of Western leaders who remain sold on the Oslo two states for two peoples principle; it is the number of Israeli military and intelligence leadership who also are still sold on these lies and deceptions. There never has been any Oslo agreement because the understanding of the two sides were as divergent as possible. Israel saw them as the opportunity for peace and cooperation and the Palestinian leadership, with the support of the Arab world behind them, saw it as taqiyyah, a deceit used against an infidel in order to advance Islamic interests and conquest. The concept of taqiyyah is well established and understood by any first year graduate student in Middle Eastern studies programs; and if not, they should find a different area of study. The problem is that peace is such a universal and central structure in Western thought and philosophies, as are negotiations and dealing honestly and forthrightly, that to believe that things are otherwise is difficult, though possible if one tries and concentrates on exactly what the other side says to their own people. What makes things more difficult is that the liberal leftist media and populations refuse to allow themselves, under any circumstance, to believe that peace might be impossible to attain in any situation. If the left today were faced with the onset of World War II, they would negotiate and negotiate until the free world consisted of some small atoll in the South Pacific surrounded by Japanese and German naval vessels, and they would be negotiating still. There is also the little fact that Israel is seen as the Jew amongst nations and as such has a separate and impossible set of expectations which are made worse by the leftist Jews, such as those who make up J-street and other similar groups, who also apply this absurd demand that Israel sacrifice and sacrifice with no end to how much or how far the sacrifice demanded be, as they are not the ones who will pay the price. Some have even gone so far as to claim, what do the Israelis have to lose in sacrificing for peace as they can always come and live in the United States. This is, in and of itself, an absurd piece of illogic not to mention, history has shown what happens when Jews face death and try to rely on the good graces of the Western nations.

 

We recently read an article on Politico targeting Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu over his disagreement with the outspoken and mostly retired military and intelligence corps, and how such a disagreement is leading Israel dangerously close to fascism. It was the author’s, and we trust the editors’ as well, that Israelis would be better led by its military and intelligence officers than under their elected leader. The article is titled Netanyahu vs. the Generals and went on and on endlessly stating the same tired logic as if repetition and quoting every last individual supporting the spitefulness against Netanyahu would eventually wear the reader down. The piece might actually be the opening shot across the bow announcing the candidacy of Ehud Barak for Prime Minister. Small hint to those in agreement, should Israelis have a choice between Ehud Barak and virtually any moderate or even extremist right wing politician, Barak would lose convincingly. Where his reputation is not nearly that of Guy Fawkes, the disasters attached to his time as Prime Minister preclude his ever holding that position for as long as Israelis have memories of his atrocious policy choices, of which the hasty and disorganized routing retreat from Lebanon is just the beginning of the highlight reel. For the record neither of us supported Likud and in one case, at least, Bibi Netanyahu was much of the reason why as there are numerous other Likud members who would very easily garner our votes, but that is up to the Likudnics to decide. We realize that changes take time, so time will tell.

 

British Mandate as prescribed division between Arab State of Jordan and Jewish State of Israel

 

As far as peace with the Palestinians, we need realize that the term Palestinian once meant the Jews residing under British Mandate rule while at those times the Arabs were known as Arabs or Palestinian Arabs as compared to Palestinian Jews. One also need remember that this was during the period when both Jordan and Israel were simply the Mandate. Eventually the plan was enacted and Jordan became the Arab State and Israel the Jewish State. The most obvious difference was Israel permitted Arabs, whether practicing Muslims, Christians, Jews or any other or no religion, to remain residing with full rights as citizens, while Jordan expelled any Jew ever to come within their area under their control. That was made most evident after they conquered by force of arms in an offensive war parts of Judea and Samaria, renamed it West Bank, and evicted every last Jew under pain of death, gifting their lands to people favored by the government and destroyed every Synagogue and Jewish religious academy within said lands. The adopting of Palestinian by the Arabs was just one part of their adoption of all of Jewish history with some simple adjustments in an effort to claim them and not the Israelites, the Jews, were the earliest surviving peoples from these areas. Anybody familiar with Judeo-Christian religions knows this to be a deceit and even more so if they are knowledgeable of Islamic and Arab history, as the Arabs did not venture forth from the Arabian Peninsula until the Seventh Century. That date is almost, if not, two millennia after the Israelites arrived from their Exodus from Egypt; one might be familiar with this as there is a book of the Old Testament with the same name. If we were to count from the times when Abraham first arrived in the land, we would need close to another half of a millennia if not more. Their deceit can only last as long as people continue to give their lies credence, which they do at their own peril. Such brings us to our next discussion, the awakening of the Western World.

 

For most of the past century plus the casualty of Islamic violence has been the Jewish communities in the area of Israel both before the birth of the nation in 1948 and continuously afterwards starting with the invasion by multiple armies the morning of her birth. India and Russia had rather publicly covered conflicts and numerous African nations have also been subjected to violence as have much of the Balkans. Then there have been the intra-Islamic violence. It has only been the turn of the Twenty-First Century which has brought continued and sustained Islamic violence to the Western World. What is going to be instructive is exactly how the developed world reacts to the onslaught of Islamic violence. Of further interest will be whether or not their views and demands upon Israel are altered even in the slightest as a result of these experiences. Russia has shown Israel a fair degree of respect and freedom to act as necessary while not giving full measure as they also keep relations with the Muslim nations such as with Egypt, Saudi Arabia, Iran and Syria; for it is with Syria they hold their Mediterranean warm water Atlantic Naval ports.

 

Beyond this, the longest standing restrictions on Islamic activities belong with Japan. Many are unaware but Japan has always refused Muslims permanent residence status in their lands. Further, Muslims may not own property, may not operate a business and the worship of Islam is banned. Needless to point out but no Mosque may ever be built on Japanese soil. Muslim tourism is permitted but any Muslim tourist caught conducting any form of Islamic instructions or otherwise attempting to spread the word of Islam is summarily and immediately deported along with their entire family; and if with a group, then the entire group is deported. The Japanese treat Islam as if it were a dread plague that once taking a foothold could threaten life on their islands. If the news is accurate, and we see no reason to disbelieve our sources, Cuba has recently refused permission for a Mosque to be built on their island, Cuba, that’s right, Cuba! Angola is but the first in alphabetical order of African nations enacting some limit if not outright ban on Islam.

 

In Europe the latest trend has been in opposition to Angela Markel‘s open door policy for Muslims with Norway having deported many hundreds resulting in a better than 50% drop in felonies. This is allowing their police to attend to other functions rather than putting out crime emergencies twenty-four-seven for the first time since the ‘refugees’ began arriving. Additionally there have been reports of attacks against Mosques and Muslims with some areas becoming so unfriendly that the Muslims are deporting themselves back to their home nations. The Czech Republic has flat banned Islam from their country declaring it to be an evil. Muslims in Ireland have reached the conclusion that they are less than welcome and in Belfast, as a start, the Muslims have been departing for home sweet home and this appears to be the trend across all of Northern Ireland. The British Home Secretary is preparing legislations which, though not expressly stating their application to Muslims, are aimed at curtailing anti-social behavior and allowing greater leeway in deporting or using other lesser methods to control an out of hand situation. The Polish Defense League has issued a warning to Muslims against their continuing certain behaviors and sixteen states have drafted legislation banning Sharia. A number of states in America are entertaining laws banning Sharia or any foreign code of laws all aimed at preventing the use of Sharia. China has imprisoned twenty-two Imams for preaching hate and anti-China themes and has executed eighteen jihadists. China is additionally stamping out any campaigns for separatism especially in the largely Islamic western province of Xinjiang. Muslim prayers are banned in government buildings and schools in China. Our last example of such measures comes from the Netherlands where a group of Ministers of Parliament are calling for the closure and destruction of all Mosques. One Minister stated “We want to clean Netherlands of hateful Islam.” He did not differentiate hateful Islam from any other form of Islam. Speaking on behalf of the right wing Party for Freedom, a nationalist party, Minister of the Dutch Parliament Machiel De Graaf stated, “All Mosques in the Netherlands should be shut down. Without Islam the Netherlands would be a wonderful, safe country to live in, as it was before the arrival of Muslim ‘refugees’.”

 

The world appears to slowly be awakening to the real face of Islam; a violent and unruly cult more desirous of ruling the world than of acting in what the rest of the world believes is a religious manner. Every other previous imperialist religion, Christianity, Shinto, Hindu and any others, have all been reformed and now stand side by side with all these religions seeking peaceful coexistence and mutual assistance. The exception to this rule is obvious, Islam. When Mosques are discovered in numerous countries to contain more rifles, grenades, bombs and bomb making material than prayer rugs and prayer books, then there is a definite problem. As the developed world realizes, along with the rest of the world, this threat for what it is, it is hoped that they will apply their learned knowledge to the situation in Israel. This could finally allow the solution which should have been applied immediately after the Six Day War, Israel attaining her originally promised borders, which includes the Jordan River to the Mediterranean Sea, and those previous Jordanian citizens and their families deported to the Arab nation of their choosing willing to receive them, or into Syria. The double standard cannot be continued after the truth has been driven home that Islam does not play well with others and is treacherous to the continued health of any nation it inhabits. What is good for the European nations and the world in general must, in all fairness, also be permitted Israel. To do otherwise is pure anti-Semitism, and this time that is an accurate accusation and an accurate application of the terminology.

 

Beyond the Cusp

 

Will Paris Punish Palestinian Authority or Are They Too Blind to See

 

Arab Palestinian Authority (PA) Foreign Minister Riyad al-Malki made a statement which flies in the face of peace efforts comfortable in the fact that the entire top echelon of officials could walk down the Champs-Élysées on a Saturday evening shooting all who remained in sight using fully automatic weapons with sound suppressors (silencers) and Israel and the settlements would be blamed. This chutzpah was on full display as PA Foreign Minister Riyad al-Malki while visiting Japan on Monday stated, “We will never go back and sit again in direct Israeli-Palestinian negotiations.” Al-Malki further stated, “If Daesh (Islamic State) take advantage of lack of any brokers…then of course, they might come and try to fill it. This is very dangerous.” He all but invited the Islamic State to come assist them, in our opinion, and share the spoils of any conquest hoping they would be left in power. We might advise al-Malki to be careful how you state things as bad things happen to ignorant people tempting fate in the Middle East. This is what occurred with Israel and the leftist secret negotiations involving the leaders of the terrorist institution known as the PLO (Palestinian Liberation Organization) which were wanted in numerous nations for their actions of terror murdering anyone from high ranking politicians such as the Chargé d’Affaires at the American Embassy George Curtis Moore, fellow American United States Ambassador to the Sudan Cleo Allen Noel, United States Deputy Chief of Mission to Sudan George Curtis Moore, amongst other diplomats and members of the Saudi Royal Family and embassy officials attending a party celebrating a new posting for George Curtis Moore on March 1, 1973, the Saudi embassy in Khartoum. The assassination of the Americans was carried out on direct orders of Yassir Arafat which the United States CIA (Central Intelligence Agency) had recorded as they were monitoring the telephones used by the PLO ranking members in their offices and even their residences in some circumstances.

 

 

Arab Palestinian Authority (PA) Foreign Minister Riyad al-Malki who stated recently,
“We will never go back and sit again in direct Israeli-Palestinian negotiations.
If Daesh (Islamic State) take advantage of lack of any brokers…
then of course, they might come and try to fill it.
This is very dangerous.”

 

 

Had even a lowly clerk in the Israeli Foreign Ministry made a similar comment out of hand while on a break and any New York Times reporter overhears, the headlines of the next day’s New York Times would scream about “according to a ranking member of the Israeli Foreign Ministry” and swear that they had scooped the rest of the media in getting this story and no amount of Israeli denials would ever change the world-wide perception that the headline had to be true. That is the coloring of the Arab Israeli conflict that no need to check the validity of anything stated which damns Israel from even the act of the lowly clerk while any actual statement by high ranking PA sources is automatically the result of Israeli extreme acts against the Arab Palestinian society. Mahmoud Abbas cancelling elections and breaking promises to hold overdue elections countless times, then that must be reported as Israel’s fault and Israel refusing to allow the Arab Palestinians to vote. PA officials call for “Day of Rage” and the resulting unrest in the streets of Nablus has to have been caused by Israeli oppressions, occupation, genocidal policies, military presence or any number of Israeli evils including breathing and refusing to completely surrender to all PA demands including cleansing the area from the (Jordan) River to the (Mediterranean) Sea of Jews before giving all of Israel to the Arab masses. Such is the level of reporting and official interpretation of all actions and statements.

 

These impositions of altered realities by the European Union, United States State Department, President Obama’s administration, the United Nations, numerous European countries and Foreign funded NGOs registered as Israeli NGOs all tax exempt are carrying out the expressed desires, views and realities of their European masters. These NGOs also arrange mass demonstrations against any legislation to open these NGOs’ financing to public scrutiny to the point of suing in the Supreme Court, all to strike laws so they can continue to conceal the reality of their source of funding. Needless to point out, but the Leftist world media both within and beyond Israeli shores and borders all paint Israeli government officials as fascists when they attempt to enact common sense laws which would expose the financing of any and all NGOs receiving over half of their funding from governments outside of Israel.

 

Think to yourself what would happen in France, the United States, Germany, or anywhere in the free world if an NGO were found to be receiving a sizeable majority of its funding from Israel and attempting to affect the decisions of the legislature and was in cahoots with a major newspapers within that country and the extended leftist media around the world all to overturn the decisions of the government and worked to pull down the government and steer the “right” people with the “best ideas” for the nation into power despite the majority of the nation feeling the opposite of what the NGO was purporting. Now imagine further if that NGO was also affecting the nation’s leaders to become puppets to the Israelis and enacting legislation that Israel wanted that nation to hold and all in complete and blind willfulness in support of Israel. The explosive reaction when such became known and the ensuing lynching of that NGO and a complete auditing of all other NGOs for foreign, especially Israeli in this make believe scenario, with the complete records and levels of foreign monies taken by any and every NGO becoming public knowledge and those NGOs receiving even a measly ten percent would be demanded to be disbanded and such made illegal going forward. Never mind such being a normal response, Israel must be treated with special case scenario rules where all means of absolutely disgusting and unacceptable practices elsewhere in the world being normal occurrences with Israeli Knesset plagued with foreign NGOs masquerading as loyal, patriotic human rights internal NGOs receiving as high as over three-fourths of their funding from outside of Israel and doing the directed policies and desires of these foreign financiers be they national government or groups of billionaires desiring to destroy Israel as the ultimate dream in fulfilling their anti-Semitic and deadly desires.

 

Such is the current reality where the courts are used by agents of foreign nations as if they were simply a normal group of patriotic Israelis banding together for a common cause and not highly paid Israelis representing some foreign nation such as the Netherlands, Belgium, Norway or even the consolidated European Union representing all of Europe and these entities actually using multiple NGOs having each with a major role and supportive minor roles all working in complete cooperation making them into a formidable political and media controlling force. Such would be prosecutable for treason of any members and especially officers who knowingly acted as an agent of a foreign government. There is a name for such a person, traitor or spy, either one carrying potentially a death sentence. And the fact that these foreign financed NGOs which are masquerading as Israel NGOs actively seeking to destroy the rule of law, destroy the ability of the government to protect the people, destroy the effectiveness of the IDF to defend the nation, destroy the will of the Israeli people (not gonna happen), and pull down the ruling elected government and forcing new elections where these NGOs and whole new entities will arrive and run the campaign and take out media advertisements all in a concerted effort to elect a government which will do the bidding of foreign interests who desire the death of Israel and the extermination of the over six-million Jews living in Israel. Does that number sound familiar to anyone? We thought so.

 

These foreign entities must be unmasked and disbanded or, at a minimum, be forced to operate openly as a foreign entity and say so in an obvious manner on all forms of advertising and lobbying, which is granting them more leeway than any other nation in the world would allow. Further, their financing must be made public and these NGOs to register as foreign agents and thus be taxed at an additional rate in order to make their actions less profitable and hopefully end the practice of foreign entities in the affairs of the Jewish State. Further, the intervention by foreign governments holding what they believe to be necessary negotiations and making the failure of these self-same negotiations the fulfillment of what are generally considered the greatest range of demands by one side being enforced internationally are not negotiations at all, but a political ploy to make the dreams of one side enacted over the other with the blessings of outside forces and entities including nations. These are the self-same nations who are behind the treasonous NGOs. Israel needs to inform France that Israel will not be participating in the reenactment of the Dreyfus Affair with the State of Israel playing the role of Alfred Dreyfus and the French working as agents for the Arab Palestinians who are portraying the Generals of the then French Military and guilty parties in the act of treason. If the French desire to dictate to Israel the recognition of particular boundaries for an entity called Palestine, which will act as the criminal belligerent they are in reality, then by all means send your brave warriors who enforce the wills of the French government to Nablus. From there they may start their ill-fated and doomed exercise in futility as the Arabs do not desire an actual state, see Gaza; they want the death of Israel.

 

The sole truism in all of this is that the many mainly European funded NGOs and the French Government are working towards the same end, the destruction of Israel. This has been the effort since almost immediately after each step taken leading to the eventual establishment of the State of Israel. These desires became obvious when British and French officers worked almost hand-in-hand with Nazi officers with whom a few years earlier they were on opposite sides of a World War. These officers were working with the Egyptians and Jordanians largely; yet despite the statistically overwhelming and apparently unbeatable odds against them, the Israeli small individual units quickly banded, merging as an army, even though losing some lands, defended the state from annihilation. These bands made up of Palmach, Irgun, Stern Gang and Kibbutzim security forces, are today seen as the IDF, the Israeli Defense Forces. Those were what stood at the ready facing armies, trained and equipped with weapons systems the Israelis could only dream of having, bracing at Jewish outposts and Kibbutzim to hold the line as long as possible before withdrawal to the set staging points where distribution of assets was carried out. It was there where the few and select American and British officers joined their ranks but in a different manner than those with the Arabs; these were by-enlarge Jewish officers who were making Aliya and had mostly learned the language, Hebrew or Yiddish, and planned on remaining in Israel after the 1948-9 warfare.
Now the world is slowly but inexorably against Israel and doing so largely because it is the Jewish State. They demanded that Israel surrender all claims to the lands east of the Jordan River, over three-quarters of the British Mandate lands. Now they are demanding Israel surrender another third of the remaining lands west of the Jordan River as well as over half of the capital city of Jerusalem including all of the Old City, Temple Mount and all the holy sites in Jerusalem and the heartlands of ancient Israel. Next will be the demand that Israel surrender the Jordan Valley and overlooking positions thus blinding Israel to attacks and smuggling of weapons to the Arab Palestinians thus basically opening the nine-mile-wide center of the nation which holds three-fourths of its population and industry along with water and power generation to a blitzing assault and before that direct rocket fire including antiaircraft weapons trained and within range of Ben Gurion International Airport, the largest airport in the small nation of Israel. The world acts as if Israel was a giant amongst the nations in land mass and not as if Israel was barely the size of New Jersey and so much smaller than it is treated as it is demanded to surrender more and more for the cause of its own destruction. Below are some maps to give one an idea on the size of Israel. Please take some time and let the reality bite and take hold and then tell us how much land we can afford to give our sworn enemies and still survive.

 

 

Exactly How Small is Israel
A Comparison Against Four
Well Known Countries

 

 

The final note we have discerned is that, as asked in the title, the French, the European Union, the United Nations, the whole bloody world are all willfully too blind to see. It is not that they are incapable of seeing or that they do not actually see, it is they are choosing what to see and what to ignore even if it destroys them in the process. The world has decided that Islam is their chosen answer to all their ills and Israel is their ills, all of them and thus they choose Islam and damn Israel for refusing to surrender as they are doing. They understand that Islam means surrender your soul and your mind to Allah and that Allah is not Hashem, but Hashem demands you think and be responsible for your actions while Allah instructs your every move and thinking is not only not required but actually punished as there must be no deviation from the purification of Islam after it becomes the only force on Earth. The problem is in Islam those who do anything different than your groups are heretics and must be destroyed and carrying that to its final conclusion means that in the final end there will be only one, the last true believer after he destroys the disbeliever which will likely be his brother and then Islam will be pure and without a future. And they wonder why Israel would rather be responsible for their actions and choose to be what Hashem makes possible for them, and that precludes surrender to Allah, something I stated rather emphatically to a Muslim who insisted that the day would come when I would surrender to Allah.

 

Beyond the Cusp