Beyond the Cusp

May 19, 2017

Rumor UNESCO to Vote to Eliminate Israel

 

UNESCO may next consider making the claim that the Jews are a nationless people and merely a religious choice without any connection to any lands anywhere and having just magically come into being in the Diaspora. This would place the United Nations and all its member states in a position where their recognition of Israel would now be in dispute. The Palestinians claim that Palestine is the indigenous peoples with rightful claims to all lands between Jordan River and the Mediterranean Sea and the Jewish people with no rights to fight such claims. This would most certainly lead to suits brought by the Palestinians and any friends they have in the Arab World, the Greater Muslim World or any of their plethora of friends in Europe taking to the World Courts demands that all treaties setting up Israel as the Jewish State be rendered null and void followed by the demands for rescinding any recognition of Israel and of the nation of Israel itself. Such judgements would make any Israeli defense of their land an illegal act and a crime against humanity. The final judgement would be to award the land of Israel to the Palestinian Authority making Palestine the recognized nation and Israel as an illegal rogue entity internationally cast as a terrorist entity claiming to be a nation. Would the European nations once again cast votes of “abstain” allowing for the Arab nations and their allies to win such a decision by default? Would we realize another vote will come with results somewhat along the lines of twenty-four nations voting in favor, nine voting against and the remaining twenty-five either abstaining or not even bothering to show for the vote. This means that out of fifty-eight member states, a minority of twenty-four nations, almost all Arab or Muslim nations with one or two from Europe deciding that Israel has no right of being the home of the Jewish faith despite four-thousand years of Jewish history in Jerusalem where the vast majority of these years Jerusalem having a Jewish majority population.

 

One would expect that any vote where a comfortable majority does not support a measure passes because the majority who oppose the measure decide that in order to not risk higher oil prices along with a basis of anti-Semitism decide that simply abstaining or not even bothering to attend allows a measure to pass. The rules should require that any measure in order to be adopted should require a majority of the fifty-eight member nations voting in favor thus requiring twenty-nine votes minimum and preferably thirty votes to pass any measure. UNESCO does not work in such a manner as it prefers to suit the cabal which rule through intimidation using their black-gold, their oil weapon, to assure that Israel be always behind the eight-ball. UNESCO considered a measure to allow the admission of Palestine as an equal and recognized nation before the Security Council had admitted Palestine to the United Nations and even the General Assembly had not admitted Palestine as a member state though they had sent a request to the Security Council, which voted the membership down defeating the request. That means the Security Council stated clearly that Palestine did not meet the requirements for being a nation-state and thus were not to be admitted to any United Nations agency and were to remain unable to apply, or be admitted if they applied, until they are recognized and admitted to the United Nations as a member state. In the meantime they remained permitted as an observer state inadmissible as a member to any agency belonging to the United Nations.

 

Well, UNESCO concluded that none of these rules was intended for them and they could do whatever they desired. With the Palestinian Authority pestering them incessantly, just as they were doing with almost every other agency attached to the United Nations, they were seeking a backdoor means of being recognized as a nation and thus able to take Israel before the International Criminal Court (ICC) and the International Court of Justice (ICJ) for war crimes and crimes against humanity. The Palestinian UNESCO membership bid, requiring two-thirds approval of the agency’s General Conference, passed by a vote of one-hundred-seven in favor, with fourteen against, with fifty-two abstentions. A two-thirds majority of one-hundred-seventy-three nations comes to one-hundred-sixteen votes, which would imply that the one-hundred-seven votes in favor falls nine votes short. Instead, UNESCO decided that the fifty-two abstentions were to count as non-existing states making the new total number of members one-hundred-twenty-one instead of one-hundred-seventy-three thus making the two-thirds a mere eighty-one votes instead of one-hundred-sixteen votes. This was a twisting of the rules of order to the extreme, a habit UNESCO utilizes on every vote concerning Israel and always because their throwing out all nations abstaining or not showing to vote as not existing thus making a passing vote easier to attain is legion.

 

Will there be any surprise when UNESCO decides that Israel does not exist and that the Balfour Declarations, the placing the Balfour Declaration into encoded law through the San Remo Conference and further establishing these facts with the Treaty of Sèvres all voided. Further UNESCO is voiding the Mandate System and all the work of the League of Nations after World War I and is attempting to erase the United Nations obligations under Article 80 of the United Nations Charter. Lastly, they are attempting to put into stone that the entire history of the Jewish People in the Holy Land, the entire Bible, Torah and Christianity as a ruse which never happened because Israel and the Jewish People in the Holy Land never existed, according to UNESCO.

 

This is the largest farce probably in the history of mankind. This is the erasure of so much history that all of Europe will require a rewriting of their history removing all references to Jerusalem and the Holy Lands. The Crusades will now become what historians have always desired them to be, an unmitigated aggressions against the indigenous Palestinians residing in their homelands around Jerusalem as they had resided there since before any others apparently including the Canaanites or were the Canaanites who Joshua never fought a campaign destroying their cities and wiping them out as the Jewish People made these lands their own in the nearly three centuries leading up to 1000 BCE when King David moved the Capital City of the Israelites, of the Jewish People, from Hevron (today Hebron), please note the Capital was once Hevron, to the newly captured Yerushalayim, today known as Jerusalem.

 

But UNESCO; the United Nations Education, Science and Cultural Agency; is about to decide that history really began somewhere around 725 AD and known and accepted history began in Medina and expanded to Mecca and from there spread outward and as the Arab Muslim armies conquered lands, history began exactly as they defeated others making everything start with Arab and Muslim conquest. All history before the coming of Arab conquest is to be decreed meaningless and nothing exists until the Muslims conquer those lands. This means that Europe does not yet exist as it has yet to become Islamic, but once it does, then its history will start and everything before then will be wiped from the records as meaningless.

 

The Americas do not exist yet and are but the lands of the heathens, the uncivilized spores of those who are not Islamic. But not to fret as there will come the day that all of the Americas will come into existence, but only after it falls to Islam. Oh, you have doubts that the Americas, especially the United States, will fall under the conquering forces of Islam. Well, you need to understand that Mohammad wrote a book known as the Quran, which promised those who followed the writings of Mohammad were guaranteed to conquer the entire world. Mohammad had little knowledge of the size of the world, likely knew not of the existence of the British Isles, Russia, China, much of Asia, the Americas, and likely might not have heard of Rome and even if he had, he knew not where it could be found. Mohammad dictated the Quran, as he was illiterate and thus unable of writing down that which he was prophesizing. But he still presumably dictated that Allah, the God of Abram, Ishmael and Muhammad, not to be confused with Hashem of Abraham, Isaack and Jacob.

 

Yes, my friends, there is a difference between Hashem and Allah; they are separate deities from completely different histories from Abram and Abraham. Abram fathered Ishmael before his name was changed as part of his covenant with Hashem, thus Abram and the son he fathered, Ishmael were from his life before the covenant with Hashem and thus it makes Allah a separate entity from Hashem. Once Abram accepted the covenant with Hashem, his name became Abraham and he underwent a circumcision, and his wife’s name changed from Sari to Sarah. After his accepting the covenant with Hashem, Sarah was permitted to birth a son despite her extreme age and presumably being beyond birthing years. This son was Isaack who would father Jacob. From this came the tribes, the years in Egypt, the return and conquest of the Promised Lands, which would include the cave bought by Abraham in which to bury his family just outside Hebron. But all of these events transpired over two-thousand years before the birth of Muhammad, thus it never happened in Islamic history, as they believe. How they can believe on one hand that they are the descendants of Avram and Ishmael and yet nothing really counts as having happened before Muhammad and his prophesies. Oh, and did we happen to mention that he had two very different revelations; the original which is very forgiving and accepting of other religions and would be called the Mecca Quran and a second revelation in Medina which very much represents the ideals of a warlord and leader of a very successful army of caravan raiders. The rule which was applied well after the death of Muhammad, known as the law of abrogation, demand that Muslims follow the warlike writings from Medina and consider them to be absolute and overriding the writings of Mecca which preached coexistence and a gentle kindness. A bare bones introduction to this can be found with links to many further studies in comments of other readers can be found at our article Which Quran, Mecca or Medina?

 

UNESCO has become a tool of the Arab and Muslim world being used initially to eliminate the Jews. One had best be advised to remember that what starts with the Jews never ends with the Jews. UNESCO has already ruled that the core of Judaism, the Temple Mount belongs to the Muslims and has no Jewish or Christian history; the history of the Temple Mount only came into existence when Islam conquered it and all before never happened. King David never conquered Jerusalem setting aside the area of the Temple Mount, Solomon never built the First Temple atop the Temple Mount, Cyrus never permitted the Jewish People to return to the Holy Lands and their Temple Mount instructing them to rebuild their Temple and worship Hashem in peace, Darius the Great never built the Second Temple, Herod never enlarged the Temple Mount in size to its modern dimensions building what became the Western Wall to contain the newly enlarged Temple Mount, the Greeks never conquered much of the lands but avoided destroying Jerusalem, the Romans never destroyed Jerusalem and the Second Temple. Only when the Muslims conquered Jerusalem from the remains of the Roman Empire, the Byzantines, did the Temple Mount join history and just rose as the Islamic conquerors strode into the area. Amazingly, Jerusalem also joined history with the advent of Islamic rule. At this time the three holiest cities in Islam were Mecca, Medina and Constantinople. What is interesting is how the third holiest city in Islam is determined. Over time the third city has been many different cities including Toledo, Madrid, Tours, Constantinople, Paris, Rome and whatever city Islam targeted as their next conquest. This is why currently the third holiest city is Jerusalem, though it has had competition from Rome and Paris at times as they have popped up as the desired next conquest.

 

Future Hope for a Future World

Future Hope for a Future World

 

UNESCO will oblige the Arab nations as they vote as a block and the intimidated and cowed Europeans to abstain because of fear and cowardice of their leaders who are preparing to relinquish control of their continent to the powers of Islam in exchange for a comfortable golden cell in which to spend their final years, their populations be damned. UNESCO will assist in facilitating this transformation of Christian Europe to Islamic Europe. UNESCO believes they are simply aiding the next world ruling party and their officers expect to assist in ruling this brave new world. One has to wonder, what if everybody who are backing Islam in the coming war of civilizations and cultures are wrong and Islam falls short and in the end becomes simply another religion accepting of other religions and content with sharing the world or worse, they start a war which turns into the unimaginable nuclear holocaust predicted in so many fantasy books and films? Such a conflict will result in one victor, one group as the last civilization standing who will be given a new planet to rebuild and save from utter devastation. What is coming cannot be predicted nor understood and the time of the final counting will be equally beyond understanding. What will never be fathomed is the reason behind that final war, that last battle from which the new world will evolve. We can only hope that new world will be one that learns its lessons and removes all violence from their vocabulary and their societal norms and live in cooperation and peace. That is the only resolution that could ever make such a conflict have any sanity in the end.

 

Beyond the Cusp

 

Advertisements

April 10, 2016

Palestinians and Israeli Arabist Jihadist War

 

Mahmoud Abbas has two faces, one that screams ‘peace, peace but there is no peace’ to the West and they dutifully blame Israel for not simply giving Abbas all the lands he desires. Nobody ever attempts to discover the land Abbas demands as if they did they might soon catch their first glimpse of his other face. That is the face that demands ‘jihad, jihad, kill the Jews’ and take all the land from the river to the sea, Palestine will kill until free. That face is easy to find if one just translates his speeches from Arabic to English, French, whatever language the Western politicians need to understand what more and more Israelis have learned. There is a reason nobody from Europe or the United States translate Abbas speeches and the lessons taught using the textbooks dripping with Jew hatred that the Western nations are paying to provide and poison another generation and guarantee there will be no peace as long as the Jews are alive. There are those who believe that the reason nothing is ever demanded of Abbas is because all too many of the political class agree with what Abbas is instigating and know that as long as they berate Israelis and blame only Israel for the lack of peace then Abbas will kill some more Jews for them. One hopes that such is not the reality and that peace is actually what all sides desire and ignorance is the only reason that no demands are made of Abbas and the West actually does not know that the Charter never was altered and still calls for the death of all Israelis and the liberation from the river to the sea and nothing less is acceptable to Abbas or the Palestinians as they are assured by the lack of any real actions demanding both sides compromise and that all demands for concessions have and apparently always will be demanded solely of Israel. As long as they are never called upon to compromise and continue to vocally demand every inch of land with the erasure of Israel and her Jewish population then all must be on their side. One can only be confused that the Israelis have never bolted and rejected this status quo. Perhaps that time is way overdue.

 

 

Burning Israel Star of David

 

Perhaps the United States will finally elect a President who understands the lies upon which all previous Presidents have followed and finally break this fatal trend and strike out on a more realistic and fair path which demands both sides meet in the middle and that the Palestinians at long last actually change their charter such that it no longer demands the death of the Jews and the complete destruction of Israel replacing it with Palestine. That would require that the United States elect the candidate who would break with the past and actually seek a real peace and if Abbas refuses to compromise to simply walk away and free Israel to do that which removes the jihadi threat that Abbas poses and end the cycle of violence which is always initiated by Abbas and his band of jihadists. That would mean the removal of Abbas, Fatah, the PLO and the entire alphabet soup of terror mongers and allow those Arabs who would desire to live in peace to remain and those who act against Israel be deported and never permitted to return. This would also allow for replacing the texts and the hate that they teach and instead teach academics which would train the Arabs for gainful employment and a future of freedom and productivity. This would finally give the Arabs in Judea and Samaria to improve their lives and have something to live for which would have to be better than training them such that they only know how to die for Abbas and his war which he will never fight as he demands of them and he will not throw his life away attacking soldiers as he has the youth who he indoctrinates on hatred and chasing the afterlife as if that is the best future these youth can desire, it is criminal and is enough of a reason to rid the Arab society of his poisonous hate. But which of the four leading Presidential candidates would best walk that new path?

 

Since the Israeli leadership feels with good reason that Israel is dependent on the United States for too much to make a go without United States aid at this time, there is a sense of indentured servitude. One of the main reasons that this is so dates back to the deal where Israel accepted the United States promise to provide air superiority for Israel in the Middle East and bought Israel subservience with F15s and F16s if Israel gave up their designing and production of the Lavi fighter which was similar to the F16 but did not have the F15 strike capabilities. The F15s made that deal near impossible to pass up and Israel fell into the trap of dependence on the United States for their fighter and most other aircraft and the Israeli aircraft industry retooled to research, design and produce other military and civilian products. Now it would likely take Israel five to ten years to retool, design and start to produce her own fifth generation or even sixth generation, whatever capabilities and design features those airframes might entail. Likely the sixth generation fighters would be such that one pilot and gunner would control five other birds as well as their own and fly their own cover, and thus a dozen airmen would control thirty-six attack aircraft and with 360o helmets as the canopies of all the aircraft would be solid carbon fiber and Kevlar composite formed under aluminum skin making the aircraft bullet resistant and that much more difficult to shoot down. These aircraft would also have laser intercept such as the Elbit Systems C-MUSIC anti-missile Protection retooled and upgraded to divert and destroy all versions of antiaircraft missiles, heat seeking and radar lacking as well as ground-to-air and air-to-air thus removing much of the need for aircraft to need to use avoidance maneuvers as their inboard systems would remove the necessity. This could be just one of the systems incorporated along with stealth and low frequency anti-radar systems making the aircraft ultimately improbable to intercept or shoot down. But such designing and resting would take likely a dozen years to design and put into production and in the meantime Israel would need to depend on the F35JSF fighters she has already contracted for with the United States.

 

Meanwhile, what would the future most likely be like depending on each of the four Presidential frontrunners? First off, let’s take Donald Trump. He is the most difficult to gauge. Would we get the debate Donald Trump who distanced himself placing wiggle room between his foreign policies and Israel or would we get the AIPAC Donald Trump who proclaimed the United States had no closer friend and to whom he pledged his unfaltering support. The truth probably lies somewhere in between and just might be better on Mondays, Thursdays, Saturdays and Sundays while colder on Tuesdays, Wednesdays and Fridays, who knows. One thing likely is whatever the relations, they would constantly be fluid which would mean that no might not always mean no, it might mean ask again next week and remember which are your good days. So, Donald is what he will be on many issues, a puzzle which will develop and change with time and mood, not necessarily a great thing.

 

Donald Trump

 

Then we have Hillary Clinton. We got a good measure of her approach when she lectured Prime Minister Netanyahu for close to an hour if not more about how when President Obama or herself told him to jump the only response they want to hear was, “How high?” Hillary did pay Israel some lip service when she was running, or should we say buying and collecting her consolation prize of Senator from New York. That was supposed to give her the Presidency in 2008 but apparently somebody was not in on that arrangement so she got another consolation prize instead, Secretary of State, which again was supposed to prepare her for a cakewalk to the Presidency but apparently somebody did not get the memo again, imagine that. So, Hillary Clinton and the Clinton Foundation now being a wholly owned subsidiary of Saudi Arabia and the rest of the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) will not exactly be all that enamored with Israel or Egypt and there will be more contribution likely coming from Iran just to complicate matters. Israel can expect tire tracks up and down the Prime Minister’s back with a Hillary Presidency along with more telephone berating demanding he toe the line and know his place. Should there be an election in Israel we can also expect the entire Democrat election machinery to set up camp in Tel Aviv and work diligently to elect whoever a coalition backing either the Labor Party or Yair Lapid’s Yesh Atid Party depending upon who promises to be the best little soldier doing whatever they are bid to do.

 

Hillary Clinton

 

Next we will discuss Ted Cruz. Ted is the easiest of the candidates to predict only rivaled by Bernie Sanders. Ted Cruz and Bernie Sanders are polar opposites when it comes to Israel. Ted Cruz has stated and can be believed that he will invite Prime Minister Netanyahu to the White House as his first act after being sworn in. The next item on Ted Cruz’s list will be setting in motion a grand White House dinner and possibly grand black tie ball. The meal will be Kosher and the prayer before eating will be performed by a Rabbi of note and probably recommended by the Zionist Organization of America (ZOA). Ted Cruz might just be the President who breaks with the past and ignores the State Department and might even clean out the State department which has often acted as the main functionary for America’s enemies. They appeared to back the Soviet Union and once it collapsed, they quickly swung over to support the Arabist and jihadists. Ted will be the first President to completely ignore Mahmoud Abbas and his litany of complaints and back Israel in their fight against the same Jihadist enemies the United States and the free world are facing. There is little if any difference between Hamas and Islamic State, Hezballah and the IRGC (Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps), Fatah and the PLO (Palestinian Liberation Organization), Islamic Jihad and al Qaeda. These are all either Sunni or Shiite jihadist movements all of which desire an entire world under the boot of Islam; they just differ over which flavor of Islam, rocky road or peanut butter fudge ripple. Ted Cruz fully understands this and if he is smart and can get Allen West for either Secretary of Defense or, if cleaning out the State department is on the to do list, Secretary of State. With Col. West Israel will have another friend in high places.

 

Ted Cruz

 

This leaves Bernie Sanders. Bernie Sanders was born Jewish, or at least into what was a Jewish family. Bernie Sanders himself is not all that caught up in the Jewish thing; actually he appears to run from it as fast and far as he is able. On Israel Bernie Sanders is the one candidate who makes Hillary appear friendly to Israel. Bernie while in the Senate voted to defund Israel. He would quite possibly decide to save money by cancelling the Israeli order for F35JSF fifth generation fighters. He would then likely cut all aid to Israel as well as Egypt, Saudi Arabia, Jordan, Turkey and the rest of the Middle East right before he slashed the Defense budget seeing it all as unnecessary and monies which could be better used correcting income inequality. Bernie would possibly cut all aid to the Palestinians until the leftist and his friends from the socialist camp demanded he continue or possibly increase the aid to these people as they deserved every penny and were not getting sufficient because if the United States supported them half as well as they had Israel all these years the Arab-Palestinian Israel conflict would have been resolved and Palestine would be freed from the river to the sea as it deserves. Bernie Sanders would be a disaster initially for Israel making them potentially endangered for the immediate future but fortunately Hezballah is quite preoccupied and Hamas is nowhere near strong enough to take on Israel and the Islamic State has sufficient problems holding what they have gained and also are in no position to attack Israel. Should Bernie Sanders walk away from supporting Israel it would take Israel less than a year to reinforce their position and be ready for any challenge and could then work on designing their next generation fighter. In the long run Israel would be ahead and more self-reliant and would actually owe Bernie a thank you visit where the Israelis could give him a demonstration of the new Israeli fighter which was going to make many decide to purchase from Israel and forgo the limitations and the leash which the F15JSF has connecting them permanently to the United States which requires regular uploads and downloads feeding the United States every bit of information on how the fighter was used, where it flew, when it flew and any other data including weapons loads that it carried on each mission and if they were deployed and any of the armaments fired and if so at what and whether they hit target or missed. Surely nobody could be concerned about the F35JSF relating such data during maintenance which it would require regularly. So, by cutting Israel off, Bernie Sanders might actually be providing Israel with the incentive to become self-reliant and self-sufficient for her own defense for the immediate and longer future.

 

Bernie Sanders

 

The one thing which was obvious from the start of the American primary elections, the only party which had any chance of offering a candidate who would back Israel even slightly was the Republicans. This stands in stark contrast to elections past where supporting Israel was a guaranteed given in word even if action was less convincing. Things have turned in the United States and we are witnessing the slow but inevitable erosion of the American Israeli love affair. The marriage is without a doubt heading for a divorce and Israel had best get their arms around this inevitability and begin to make whatever adjustments will become necessary and required. The first is get prepared to at the least make their own aircraft as American jets may not be forthcoming after the F35JSF, and that is a fact, not conjecture. We know not how much longer the Republicans will be able to be trusted to support Israel, but once they slide the end will be in sight.

 

Beyond the Cusp

 

February 23, 2016

Two State Solution Already Exists and it Failed

Filed under: 24/7 News Reporting,Administration,al-Qaeda,Alexander the Great,American People Voice Opinion,Anti-Israel,Anti-Semitism,Anti-Zionist,Appease Islamic Interests,Arab Appeasement,Arab Authority,Arab League,Arab Spring,Arab Winter,Arab World,Barbarian Forces,Battle of Khaybar,Battle of Tours,Blood Libel,Borders,Boycott,Calaphate,Caliphate,Carthage,Charles "The Hammer" Martel,Commander in Cheif,Conflict Avoidnce,Coverup,Disengagement,Ditherer in Chief,Divestment,East Jerusalem,Eretz Yisroel,Europe,European Governments,European Pressure,European Union,Forced Solution,Foreign Funding,Foreign NGOs,Gaza,German Pressure,Government,Hamas,Hate,History,International Politics,Intifada,Iron Dome,ISIS in Gaza,Islam,Islamic Jihad,Islamic Pressure,Islamic State,Israel,Israeli Capital City,Israeli Interests,Jerusalem,Jewish Leadership,Jewish State,Jordan,Jordan River,Judea,Kotel,Leftist Pressures,Libya,Mahmoud Abbas,Media,Mediterranean Sea,Middle East,Mohammed,Muslim Brotherhood,Muslim Expansionism,Muslim Invade Europe from the East,Muslim Invasoin of Europe from the West,Muslim World,Netanyahu,Obama,Oslo Accords,Palestinian,Palestinian Authority,Palestinian Pressures,Paris,Peace Process,Politicized Findings,Politics,President Obama,President Obama Pessing Freeze,Promised Land,Recognize Israel,Religious Pressures,Samaria,Saudi Arabian Pressure,Secular Interests,Settlements,Support Israel,Taqiyya,Temple Mount,Temple Mount,Terror,Threat to Israel,Two State Solution,Union Interests,United Nations,United Nations Presures,United States,West Bank,Western World,World Opinion,Yasser Arafat,Zionism,Zionist — qwertster @ 3:34 AM
Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

 

When somebody mentions the Arab-Israeli peace process the first concept out of almost everybody’s mouth is “Two State Solution” and when asked for clarification they claim “You know, the Oslo Accord thingie with there being two states living side by side with the Arabs and Jews in peace and security.” That is when I like to claim that that already has been accomplished, so why are we still talking about it? That is when I usually get the deer in the headlights stare and weird sounds as they try to wrap their brains around why I am so completely out of my mind, and then I give them the magic formula, “There are two states right now, Hamastan in Gaza and the rest is Israel.” Where I may not have had this identical word for word exchange, I have had this exchange as the basic gist of a discussion and then it devolves quickly just as any honest discussion will with anybody taking the most popular reasoning for why the negotiations keep failing, Prime Minister Netanyahu or the Jews refuse to make peace because of the settlers. I go quietly and calmly ballistic and explain the reality and they inform me that until I take a reality check they are not going to waste their time trying to teach me what really is happening but assure me right before they walk away mumbling about my sanity and shaking their heads that Jews like me are the reason there can be no peace. That is one of the blessings of having made Aliyah; that discussion has not and probably never will occur furrowing my brow unless I make the mistake for going down to Tel Aviv and entering one of the exclusive and needlessly expensive coffee shops seeking to distress myself with two state give up the old city and West Bank Zombies still living in pre Arab Spring turned Winter mindsets. The one point they make which is valid is if there is to be a two state solution then Gaza and the parts of Judea and Samaria which has erroneously become the West Bank, a name invented by Jordan during their nineteen year occupation of lands west of the Jordan River; anyway, the two Arab areas must be unified under one entity. That leads to the other problem, no peace as such can be reached until the Arab civil war between the Palestinian Authority (PA) and the rulers in Gaza of Hamas and Islamic Jihad reach some agreement on common governance over their respective enclaves. That is another thing that will not be happening too soon either as the only solution which would have any hope of approval by the Arabs themselves would likely be Hamas if they held an actual election. Without any election the only other possibility would be for the Islamic State to come and replace Hamas and scare the life out of Mahmoud Abbas who would be screaming for the IDF to come protect him from the truly scary Arabs. So, you think that Islamic State would not replace Hamas and Islamic Jihad in Gaza? Let’s see.

 

There has already been a Gazan who died fighting with Islamic State as we mentioned yesterday reporting that Mufleh As’ad Abd al-Wahed Abu Aadra, aka Abu Abdullah, who was killed in or near Tripoli, Libya. This was reported as his wife received notice of his death on February 15, 2016 from Islamic State and she reported this and it was then reported by the Ma’an News Agency on February 16, 2016. People following the Islamic State or knew about Israel and the Arab-Israeli dispute would know that there have been Islamic State cells destroyed by the IDF before they caused any loss of life other than those who resisted arrest. A select few of the Islamic State cells were taken by the IDF within Section A which requires PA permission and thus makes it likely, or at least possible, that the PA could have detected the presence of Islamic State and requested Israeli assistance. In Gaza there are known to be Islamic State personnel who work with Hamas and Islamic Jihad arranging coordination with Islamic State forces in the Sinai Peninsula. This cooperation is partly why Egyptian President Sisi has ordered the smuggling tunnels flooded or otherwise destroyed. This has led to Hamas leadership accusing Egyptian President Sisi of being a stooge working for the Zionist Entity. Egypt has had their own difficulties with Islamic State, al-Qaeda and criminal enterprises all causing dire problems and great distress throughout the Sinai Peninsula. The real problems between the PA and Israel has nothing to do with the settlers, never did and never will because history has shown that for a real peace Israel will and has destroyed complete communities. When Egypt and Israel made their 1979 peace treaty Israel disbanded ten communities: Avshalom, Atzmona, Dikla, Holit, Netiv, HaAsara-Sinai, Nitzanei-Sinai, Ofira, Sufa, Talmei-Yosef, and Yamit. Then again in the August 2005 disengagement and unilateral effort Israel pulled out and destroyed twenty-six communities including one Bedouin village to the PA in the name of peace. The twenty-two including the Bedouin village in Gaza were: Bedolah, Bnei Atzmon (Atzmona), Dahaniyya (Bedouin), Dugit, Elei-Sinai, Gadid, Gan-Or, Ganei-Tal, Katif, Kfar-Darom, Kfar-Yam, Kerem-Atzmona, Morag, Neveh-Dekalim, Netzarim, Netzer-Hazani, Nisanit, Pe’at-Sade, Rafiah-Yam, Slav, Shirat-Hayam, and Tel-Katifa. Additionally, there were another four communities which were in areas being turned over to the PA in Judea and Samaria named Kadim, Ganim, Homesh, and Sa-Nur.

 

All too soon the PA and Hamas began skirmishing and an ever growing conflict which finally exploded through December 2006 and January 2007 culminating in February on 2007 with the two powers, the PA and Hamas splitting in June of 2007 with Hamas retaining military and civilian control in Gaza from which they have forced an average of a war every two years with Israel starting with escalating rocket attacks over ever greater areas beyond the will of any nation to have restraint before Israel even considers striking back in any forceful manner. Still, when Israel finally strikes back in force the world media responds with accusations of Israeli provocations and use of disproportionate force when Israeli defensive weapons such as the Iron Dome anti-missile systems and well-ordered society which use the nearly excessive numbers of shelters thus keeping the majority of the Israeli population safe while Hamas allows only their fighters to use sheltered areas and force their civilians into harm’s way with intent of causing maximum fatalities and injuries. Should Israel ever vacate any areas of Judea and Samaria allowing the PA to govern them without the presence of the IDF in areas very close to any point and sharing of intelligence then what would stop Hamas from gaining control and defeating the PA forces just as they had in Gaza? The answer is a simply nothing, absolutely nothing. But there is a problem for which we need to thank Germany’s Chancellor Angela Merkel, for initiating the program which went so completely wrong and was finally, eventually documented by a media which has a history of ignoring similar social challenges faced by Israel in dealing with a resolute and fated socio-religious system which structures Arab Palestinian society and governance and their different human right’s values or lack thereof and terribly underdeveloped social constructs with vaguely defined restrictions of interactions as compared with Western society. The New Year’s Eve base social aggressions by “refugee” males to German women across the country’s major cities that anywhere where people were found in close proximity groping and other unacceptable behavior reached levels so beyond acceptable levels that women were advised not to utilize certain central train stations.

 

Perhaps an example we recently found and can be viewed below, if we can summarize and still get the ideas across. One of the more revered Islamic clerics, Imam (Mufti) Hassan al-Laham was broadcasted giving a sermon from Gaza on Palestinian Authority TV on February 8, 2016. He gave marital advice on how to handle a difficult wife. He advised that initially the husband is to warn the wife “politely” in the hope that she will see and adjust to ease the difficulty, the troublesome actions. But what if she is also a stubborn wife who heeds not her husband? “Allah created a solution for this.” The Imam continues telling the husband that if his wife is one who requires additional management that, “Allah created a solution for this” and the husband should try “hitting that does not make her ugly.” We are advised that the Prophet Muhammad advised, “Do not hit the face and do not make her ugly. In other words, not hitting that will bring the police and break her hand and cause bleeding, or hitting that makes the face ugly.” This is not going to a good place according to Western culture and Western Law but the adviser continues advising, “The hitting is not meant to disfigure, harm, or degrade. The hitting will be like a joke. He will hit her jokingly.”

 

 

The above broadcast along with the examples of the inability of merging raw Islamic “refugees” without providing some period of adjustment coupled with education in what is acceptable behavior in Europe and what behaviors will result in their arrest and potential deportation. Such offenses are serious breaches not only etiquette but highly illegal and while molesting unaccompanied women or assaulting and striking anybody are against the laws, numerous laws which when prosecuted would necessarily result in a prolonged prison time and repeated offences would result in deportation, such behavior was acceptable in war torn Syria. One could hope that the recent offenses and other behaviors by the “refugees” would have educated Europeans to the fact that there is no compromise with the behaviors results in simply more egregious behavior and has been the fueling and driving force behind Israeli dealings with the PA as well as Hamas, Islamic Jihad and the other “Islamic entities Europeans demand Israel deal with in good faith.” Unfortunately such has proven not to be the case. If anything it has caused the Europeans to drive their demands for Israeli concessions or even leveling accusations that Israel has not sacrificed sufficiently to the PA and if Israel would take the necessary, though self-defeating, steps required to make peace with its Muslim entities to the point of sacrificing all of Israel then the behavior of their “refugees” would no longer be so difficult. How the European Union can see doubling down on pressuring Israel will help to relieve their suffering before equivalent difficulties with their Islamic forces is purely baffling, yet that is exactly what has become the case along with a number of additional calls by European entities for further sacrificing. There can be no further compromises as every compromise up until now has only set to harden the PA hearts, as if they were Pharaoh from Israeli history; while the PA, Hamas, Islamic Jihad, Islamic State and the rest of the Arab and Muslim world gaze at Israel as the weaker nation with no confidence in their claims begging for peace purely out of fear.

 

This has been echoed across the United States and Europe with pro-Palestinian rallies where often the chanted slogan is, “Khybar, Khybar, oh Yahud (Jews), the armies of Muhammad Come for You!” Add to that the other almost War Cry of, “From the River to the Sea-Palestine Must be Free.” This idea of Palestine existing freed from the Jordan River to the Mediterranean Sea would have it replacing Israel, not existing side by side. Put together at rallies organized by PA agitators and other supporters of Hamas, the PA’s al-Aqsa Martyrs Brigades and by the liberation meaning replacing, not cooperating in any manner. This extremist view explains repeated refusal to make any compromise, and instead of making counter offers, the PA, ever since Camp David and Taba, has met offers, which they agreed to review only after requiring Israel make unprecedented and unwise sacrifices for peace, from Israel as pleas for being granted any agreement as long as they retained something far less than reasonable compromise would grant. The reason behind this absolute rejectionism resulted from the time the Israelis met the exact offer demanded by Arafat one day earlier stating his terms to President Clinton which surprisingly to all involved Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Barak who agreed to meet all demands which was then followed by rejection by walking out of the conference in Paris furious that Israel met the demands and Arafat returned to the Palestinian areas and initiated the Second Intifada and an end to peace talks. Ever since the demand made in Arabic to their own people has been clear, they will accept nothing less than all the lands and the death of Israel. That is the reality European demands for an Israeli surrender have produced; an irrational belief that the world led by Europe will vanquish Israel and then gift the land to the PA. I wish that were obvious delusional thinking but can one not claim that is not the result the Europeans also champion in secret in their private affairs. The PA leadership is convinced that all they will need do is wait and allow the United Nations, European Union, European sympathizing governments, and the United States will fight against Israel and bring their desired and inevitable surrender of Israel and the entirety of the Jews worldwide laid before them at their feet prostrated in submission. What makes this all the sadder is the rising numbers in Europe, the United States, World Wide and in the United Nations which has led the PA leadership to assume there is absolutely no need for them to condescend to talking with the Israelis as Israel will disappear once Europe organizes a great army to fight for Muhammad and destroy the Jewish State gifting them what once was Israel, the enemy they could never humble, let alone defeat, and then the entirety of the world coming under the rule of Islam. This is the endgame in the PA’s leadership’s minds and this is their new minimal goal which has come one step closer to fruition under President Obama who has issued many supportive claims and demanded Israel cede more lands than ever before. Between the invasion of Europe and their inroads gained in the United States and United Nations, the Arab and Muslim world believe that the entirety of the Western World will be gifted to and all they will need to do is decide on who will lead this great and wondrously new world, but that is the problems, is it not?

 

 

President Obama stating that the future must not belong to those who slander the Prophet of Islam

 

 

Currently the United States is under mismanagement and is not likely to change any time soon if the polling in the United States proves to be correct. We just cannot help thinking that the American people have lost their way and once again need someone to show them the path back to sanity. The unfortunate thing is that these polls show either Hillary Clinton or Bernie Sanders defeating Donald Trump. Donald Trump? Are the Republicans truly serious about choosing Donald Trump, aka The Donald, as their Presidential candidate? Such a choice would guarantee the United States taking what may prove to be a terminal nap as the time is once again upon the world when they desperately require the leadership of the United States. With the leftist now ruling across the continent and Angela Merkel single-handedly may have all but destroyed much of Europe, the influx of Muslim Islamists will make things all the more unstable. Apparently Europeans forgot the cartoon draw Mohammad disaster from a few years ago when scenes as the one pictured below were anything but rare and an angry and bitter Muslims threatened every corner of Europe and their reaction was pitiful. They acquiesced and promised to make it illegal to insult Islam, the Islamic Prophet Mohammad or take any actions which the Muslims might take offense from. This produced a grievance committee which then proceeded to take offense from almost everything without exception. Europe and many in the United States, especially on the college and university campuses, are where the leaders of the world for the next fifty years are being educated that Islam is sacred while Judeo-Christian ethics and morality are depraved and rejectionable. These will be the generation who potentially will sell the world to Islam for a promise of no more prayers at which point they will need prayer more than ever before. Will the future surrender to Islam? That remains to be seen but they are not being prepared to face what will be wrought, not preparing them in the slightest. If they follow the teachings and actions of their professors and university administrators then all they will know to do is roll over and play dead hoping that their new masters do not inflict too much pain and suffering. They will have held to also hope as the only real hope is to stand for your principles. Of course that requires having principles to begin with. Below is a reminder of what was, what actually is, and what will be the result if the path is not corrected and corrected soon. Winston Churchill once stated something so applicable to the world situation of today which we will post after the images of the past, present and possibly long into the future. The choice is to be made in the next decade or two and made by the youth who have been cheated of having any knowledge of history to guide them going further. If we could advise the youth of the world to study one subject and do so on their own without any bias other than the obvious biases they know each book to hold and not a bias which must be ingrained to pass some far left or far right professor’s class, we would advise histories of the Middle East and North Africa, Europe from Alexander the Greek to modern day, the Mongols, and the years and wars of the first fifty years in United States history, a subject even our education did not teach in any real depth and that, we fear, was due to their teachers’ lack of knowledge or in depth reasons which is what is so vital today.

 

 

Draw the Prophet Mohammad Cartoon Demonstrations and Rioting Across Europe, the World of Islam and Beyond and the World Appears to Have Forgotten the Lessons Gained I Then Draw the Prophet Mohammad Cartoon Demonstrations and Rioting Across Europe, the World of Islam and Beyond and the World Appears to Have Forgotten the Lessons Gained II Now Draw the Prophet Mohammad Cartoon Demonstrations and Rioting Across Europe, the World of Islam and Beyond and the World Appears to Have Forgotten the Lessons Gained III Future

 

Winston Churchill said, as promised:

“If you will not fight for right when you can easily win without blood shed; if you will not fight when your victory is sure and not too costly; you may come to the moment when you will have to fight with all the odds against you and only a precarious chance of survival. There may even be a worse case. You may have to fight when there is no hope of victory, because it is better to perish than to live as slaves.”

 

Beyond the Cusp

 

Create a free website or blog at WordPress.com.