Beyond the Cusp

April 22, 2019

Terror Strikes Sri Lanka

 

Already the death toll has been reported to be approaching three-hundred and is likely to exceed that number when the final count is known plus approximately five-hundred have been wounded after three churches and three hotels were targeted with explosions this Sunday in Sri Lanka. The hotels struck were the Shangri-La, Kingsbury Hotel and Cinnamon Grand; all of which are high end luxury hotels favored by tourists, specifically European and other Western nations. The churches attacked were St Anthony’s Church in the capital, St Sebastian’s in Katuwapitiya, north of Colombo, and local media has also reported a church in Batticaloa in Eastern Province (maps posted below). The targets are obvious, western tourists and Christians attending Easter Mass. We pray that these are the last of such on this day so holy to much of the world. Yet another attack has been reported at a house in Mahawila Gardens, Dematagoda which caused an ensuing fire.

 

Sri Lanka Map Displaying Terror Strike Locations

Sri Lanka Map Displaying Terror Strike Locations

 

 

Central Colombo and Terror Bombing Locations in the Capital City of Sri Lanka

Central Colombo and Terror Bombing Locations in the Capital City of Sri Lanka

 

There is no mystery to why terror strikes holy places on the most holy days of the year. In military jargon, these are target rich environments, when your main two goals are to murder as many infidels as possible and causing fear around the world for as many people as possible. The next question would be, why Sri Lanka. One reason is that the terrorists have easy access and another is these attacks will make the news across the world potentially causing some to forgo Easter Services this year. To some in Islam, this would prove a lack of faith and devotedness by Christians thus proving to them that Islam is the superior religion, the more powerful religion.

 

There have been signs that the Arab and Islamic world, the ones the mainstream media always adds the classification of extremist or other denotation implying that they are not “real” Muslims. But Muslims are encouraged to attack non-Muslims, specifically Christians and Jews (some fatwas include Buddhists and Hindus as well as any idolater, agnostic, atheist or any unbeliever essentially as they have expanded definitions in the Quran over the years broadening the areas and regions which are to be brought under Islam. Eventually, Allah has promised that Islam will be the only religion practiced on the Earth. We found these definitions explaining the difference between offensive Jihad and defensive Jihad and under what conditions each is practiced. Assuming we read them correctly, every Muslim leader is required to employ offensive Jihad against the Kuffar such that there would never be the need for defensive Jihad as the Muslims would always be the aggressors which would so terrorize the Kuffar that they would live in abject fear too frightened to attack the Islamic regions because of their greater strength. From what we read, the Muslims are either performing offensive Jihad to sufficient levels, otherwise they will face defensive Jihad. This would imply that Islamic nations which border any non-Islamic nation, they are either to make periodic attacks, at least once or twice each year, so as to place the fear of the Jihadists to such a point that these nations would never even consider attacking their Islamic neighbors. What if their neighbors had no intention of ever attacking their Islamic nation? This would be interpreted as proving any offensive Jihad was working exactly as in the Quran and the Hadiths. This is a self-fulfilling set of prophesies as if an Islamic is attacked, it is punishment for not being forceful enough in their offensive Jihad and if they are not attacked, that is because they have fulfilled their required offensive Jihad.

 

The terrorist attack in Sri Lanka is not an isolated case. Across the world there have been a consistent number of terrorist attacks mainly on Churches, Synagogues and Temples. There is the ongoing war waged by Boko Haram against the Christians and Animists in the regions centered on Nigeria but spreading across the entirety of the African Transition Zone (see map below). It was in response to these attacks that the French deployed troops to Mali to assist in preventing an Islamic takeover of that nation by force. The problems in Somalia are threatening of spreading into Kenya and there is still ongoing violence by the Sudan against the breakaway nation of South Sudan. Many of these internecine wars have existed for years and have simply become more intense over time. This violence is in addition to the tribal warfare still going on across Libya. And the violence between Islam and the rest of the world is not limited to Africa.

 

African Transition Zone

African Transition Zone

 

Terror has become a worldwide epidemic reaching into virtually every nation. In France over five-hundred churches have been firebombed or otherwise attacked since 9/11. The number of attacks worldwide is absolutely astonishing as depicted in the map below. We believe the yellow dots are domestic terror attacks such as the referenced “lone wolf” terror attacks while the red are parts of international terrorism. The numbers of attacks are indicative of where Islam is targeting. Currently the concentration has been in the Western world, specifically the regions under Judeo-Christian influence and the regions neighboring Muslim countries. Watching the news, one does not get much of a feel for the frequency and near universal direction where these attacks have targeted. The media attempts to cover up terrorism by downplaying the attacks. Often, as soon as such violence is perpetrated the media and the applicable law enforcement agencies including, or especially, the FBI immediately claiming that the attack definitely is not terror related. Then, after a few days when the news of the attack is all but forgotten comes the admission that it was indeed a terrorist attack. This is already counted as old news as the attack was days ago and the media has moved on thus the admission becomes back page news buried deep in the paper.

 

Terrorism Attacks 1970-2015

Terrorism Attacks 1970-2015

 

Eventually, the terrorism will reach such a point that it will no longer be something which can be ignored or minimized. When the people finally call upon the government to stand up and actually act to prevent these attacks. The people will demand that the government not only address the terrorism within the national boundaries, but to attack the sources and remove the people who are behind the attacks wherever in the world they may be found. Until that point is reached, these attacks will continue and only increase in frequency and severity. When will the world finally take the spreading terrorism seriously? Not until it becomes such a problem such that it can no longer be ignored. Government seldom take care of problems when they might be easily addressed but wait until the problem becomes impossible to leave along the side of the media coverage and becomes central to the news cycle as it has risen beyond any reason. This is a growing problem that will be pushed aside and the claim that it is beyond their ability to address as the government will wait until the people are willing to accept further curtailing of their freedoms in response to the attacks. The government never wants to address problems until they can use the problem in order to gain additional power depriving the citizens of rights such that the government gains more control. The government will demand that the people grant it additional power and accept restrictions to their freedoms before they will finally act and accept that the problem exists. Some places have already reached the point where they had no choice but to address the problem such as Israel, African Transition Zone, India and a growing situation across Europe. The United States is trailing Europe by a mere five years or there about. How long before this reaches a head? We wish we could tell you but that is beyond our ability of prognostication.

 

Beyond the Cusp

 

Advertisements

April 17, 2019

Apparently Very Few Know the Actual Laws

Filed under: Israel — qwertster @ 1:56 AM
Tags: , , , , , , , , , ,

 

We just read a fantastic article from Israeli National News Editorial Page titled “The myth of ‘land for peace’” written by Eli E. Hertz. Of course, we loved what he had to say as it mirrored much of what we state on a regular basis. He made one point which we would like to expound even further upon, namely, why does the world consistently use the Arabist terminology all the while ignoring the reality of international laws and much research which is readily available. Mr. Hertz specifically called out the world for their use of the phrase, “Occupied Palestinian Territories,” which he correctly identifies as a disingenuous term that misleads the international and every other community finding and worming its way into the lexicon used by all too many NGOs who rant against Israel. Mr. Hertz went through the actual documents from which international law is based, and as we have stated any number of times, all the lands between the Jordan River west to the Mediterranean Sea belong to the Jewish State of Israel. The sole means by which this can be altered is by having the Israeli government actually submit paperwork quitting claim to lands and gifting them to another legal governance. This is the reason that the Europeans, the NGOs, the United Nations, the Arab League, Mahmoud Abbas and all the rest of those opposed to the existence of the Jewish State press the Israeli government to formally recognize statehood of an Arab state carved out of parts of Israel. Some of their logic is breathtaking in its audacity and its unbelievably loose attachment to reality.

 

The first test of Arab claims comes from the International Court of Justice (ICJ). The General Assembly voted urging of the Palestinian Authority observer to request from the International Court of Justice a ruling on the legality of the Israeli terror wall, the wall which reduced suicide bombings to none within three years, with the hope of gaining a ruling which would lead to its dismantling such that the terrorist operations would not be hindered by the barrier. The barrier was cleared as being perfectly legal and within the rights of Israel as the sovereign over the region, but that was just the initial good news for Israel. In addition to being cleared of any wrongdoing, there was an advisory opinion issued as a cautionary warning by Egyptian Judge, Justice El Araby, from the ICJ and who sat in judgement as part of the panel which heard the case from the United Nations General Assembly in 2003 on the legality of the security barrier erected by Israel. The Honorable Justice El Araby warned the UNGA and others that filing further challenges of the legal claims to these lands ran some risks, as he stated,

 

“The international legal status of the Palestinian Territory (paras. 70-71 of the Advisory Opinion), in my view, merits more comprehensive treatment. A historical survey is relevant to the question posed by the General Assembly, for it serves as the background to understanding the legal status of the Palestinian Territory on the one hand and underlines the special and continuing responsibility of the General Assembly on the other. This may appear as academic, without relevance to the present events. The present is however determined by the accumulation of past events and no reasonable and fair concern for the future can possibly disregard a firm grasp of past events. In particular, when on more than one occasion, the rule of law was consistently side-stepped. The point of departure, or one can say in legal jargon, the critical date, is the League of Nations Mandate which was entrusted to Great Britain.” 

 

The straight forward wording of the Honorable Justice El Araby is refreshing in that it plainly lays out as a warning that the Arab arguments against Israel do not have a leg to stand on and if brought before the world courts, Israel is going to win every time. As he so succinctly put it, no judgment for the future can be reached without coming from a solid legal background set by precedent and the stated applicable laws, which when it comes to the Israeli claim to the lands between the Jordan River and the Mediterranean Sea, all the cards are held by Israel based on the League of Nations, the Mandate System and Article 80 of the United Nations Charter which all taken together give Israel claim to the lands in question. His advisory basically warned the Arabs not to come knocking on the court’s door expecting to waltz in and leave with being granted whatever they present as their demands, but those do not carry any legal weight. His warnings are specific and make a demonstrative statement and warning against any future of such actions.

 

The insistence by the world in adopting the Arabist terminology that there exists “Occupied Palestinian Territories” only serves to muddy the waters of the debate and do so in a misleading and erroneous manner. The truth of the situation would be more accurately conveyed by terms along the line that these are “Territories Occupied by the Palestinians” of legally Israeli lands. But then, the world has currently adopted almost every Arabist position in their discussions of virtually every subject where the Arab World conflicts with the remainder of the world. Another example of this misuse and twisting of realities is found in claims that Islamophobia is a greater problem than anti-Semitism. This can be proven very easily simply by researching the actual reported cases of these two forms of hatred. The table below shows the actual hate crimes statistics between anti-Semitism and Islamophobic rates over a five-year period from 2012 through 2016 clearly showing that anti-Semitic hate crimes outnumber Islamophobic hate crimes by a factor anywhere from two-to-one to as high as over five-to-one. By repeating the false data as if it were gospel does not serve either population but simply further feeds the mischaracterizing of the Muslims being targeted with greater frequency than Jews are targeted. But apparently the Arabs have adopted the methodology of Nazi Propaganda Minister Joseph Goebbels, who postulated, “the principle and which is quite true in itself and that in the big lie there is always a certain force of credibility; because the broad masses of a nation are always more easily corrupted in the deeper strata of their emotional nature than consciously or voluntarily,” often misquoted or paraphrased as: “The bigger the lie, the more it will be believed.” But there are other claims made which also fit this paradigm.

 

Religiously Biased Hate Crimes 2012-2016 Anti-Semitism and Anti-Islamic

 

Next, we would like to draw attention to the next misstatement. This is the claim that Israel is threatening to take over the Arab World. That is what they claim, that little old Israel is threatening the entirety of the Arab World. The complete insanity of this claim is immediately and easily recognized by simply looking at a map of the Arab World and Israel. In that map below, Israel is the tiny little red strip of land along the eastern edge of the Mediterranean. The reason why this fabrication is believed by so many is due to ignorance and an inflated view of the size of Israel. Many people believe that Israel is a fairly good-sized nation. When people are told that Israel is approximately the size of New Jersey, the usual and often immediate reply is something along the lines of, “No way.” Such disbelief comes from their view of Israel as one of the world’s great powers and as such it must be large. Well, some good things actually do come in small packages. People read about the inventions coming from Israel, the applications for their phones and computers coming from Israel, agricultural developments coming from Israel, medical advancements coming from Israel and the latest being Beresheet, the little spacecraft which made it all the way to the Moon only to suffer the catastrophic failure to fire its main thruster and slow its decent resulting in it striking the Moon far harder than she was designed to absorb. Still Israel became the seventh nations to orbit the Moon and the forth to actually hit the Moon. Then there is the fact that Israel is often the first nation to set up a field hospital anywhere in the world when there is any large disaster be it a storm, hurricane, earthquake or manmade disaster. These are all things one expects from the United States and thus, as Israel appears to be a match for the mighty America, people mistake Israel for being far larger than she is. There is one advantage to Israel’s diminutive size, one can reach anywhere in Israel from any other point in Israel in under one day driving.

 

Israel and the Arab World

Israel and the Arab World

 

The readiness with which the Western World has taken to adopting the Arabist and Islamic references and points of view only serves to assist advancing their narrative giving it preference over all traditional Western beliefs. The willingness, eagerness would possibly be a more accurate term, with which the Western World has come to throw out all of the Judeo-Christian ethos upon which much of the basis for the superiority attained by the Western World has been nothing short of appalling. Despite reluctance shown at times by the Church, the Judeo-Christian ethic is still the basis of common law, the basis for the English and American legal systems, the Enlightenment, the Renaissance and virtually all the advances made by the Western World over the past millennium. One of the reasons given by the progressives for the abandonment of the root of their culture is because of the dogmatic views of sexuality, marriage and numerous other items which largely fall under the classification of morality. Their decision to instead adopt the Islamic agenda is two-fold, first Islam allies with them in their attempts to rid the culture of all things Judeo-Christian and second they are accepting sight-unseen the Islamic Sharia taking the presentation they have been provided by the advance guard of an Islamic infiltration which will eventually become an invasion, just ask Belgium.

 

What will happen when Islamic forces, allied by the far left and other progressives, takes a strong enough foothold that the honest presentation will be made of exactly how Islamic jurisprudence treats such things as homosexuality, marriage, religious freedom and so many other items. When that day arrives, the sad and sorry state that their discarded Judeo-Christian basis for the society with a far more accepting and universal structure cannot be retrieved as once Sharia has been implemented, any attempt at restoring what once was the basis for Western society will now carry a death sentence as once one adopts Islam, there can be no leaving Islam. Anyone leaving Islam after once accepting Islam into their lives becomes an apostate, possibly the only thing more detestable by Islam than being a Jew. There are a number of other minor infractions which carry a death sentence of a variety under Islam. Homosexuals are treated by either being thrown from a tall building, having a wall brought down upon them or hanging, all of which are designed to end with the accused person’s death. Adultery also is punishable by death. The easiest way of putting this is that Islam is not the warm and fuzzy lovable faith which is accepting of all kinds of behavior and aligning perfectly with the leftist progressive agenda, it is as close as in total and complete opposition with the leftist and progressive principles. While we understand that the same can be stated about Judeo-Christianity, at least with Judeo-Christianity we are not being ruled by the Church. When Islam takes hold, there will be only Islam in its most rigid and strict form one can imagine. Everything you may have come to believe about Islam will come crashing down with a finality which will become the most frightening action the Western World will have ever experienced.

 

Take anywhere from two to four hours or so, depending on your reading speed, and read a copy of the Quran. Try and find one which lists the Hadiths in chronological order. To make life easier, we have an introductory piece on the Quran and in the comments are numerous links including some to such copies of the Quran. There is a rule of thumb when it comes to the Quran as some of the verses contradict or even state the opposite of other verses. The later verses supersede the earlier verses which usually means the verses written in Medina supersede the verse written in Mecca where Muhammad originally began his journey. The reasoning for this is called abrogation. Just for your information, the idea of abrogation came after the death of Muhammad, well after his passing, and was in response to a crisis in Islam and is the Islamic version of their reformation. Islam had suffered setbacks and defeats and sought out where they had gone wrong. This was at the end of the “Golden Age of Islam” when the West began to assert themselves. They went back and studied the life of Muhammad and realized that he was rejected and scorned in Mecca but flourished once established in Medina. This mean that the Quranic verse from Medina were superior to the weakness shown in Mecca. The Meccan verses still have their place, they are utilized whenever the Muslims are in the minority as they are currently throughout the West, though this is changing. The calming and acceptance oriented verses of the Mecca Quran are used to quiet any reluctance or pushback against Islam in the early stages of their conquest when they are not powerful enough to force their Sharia upon an unsuspecting public. There is an actual series of steps which the Islamic forces utilize in their takeover of any new lands. We have it in diagram form below. Currently the United States is largely in the first opening stage while European nations span anywhere from the first to as far as the third with some teetering on the forth stage. Once any society reaches the forth stage, their chances at regaining their society and the best hope is to flee or convert now.

 

Five Stages of Islamic Conquest

Five Stages of Islamic Conquest

 

There are some leftist progressives who are familiar with Sharia and the entire methodology of Islam. But they have a plan of their own, and it actually includes utilizing Islam for their own ends. Their belief is that once they have rid themselves and the Western World of what they consider a disease, Judeo-Christianity, then they will simply redefine Islam to match their secular-humanist and eco-friendly leftist progressive politics. They will supplant the Quran with the Democrat Party platform, or at least the one Bernie will be running on as well as many of their other Presidential hopefuls. This is the level of their contempt for even Islam that they believe they can simply alter the precepts of Islam replacing Quranic verses with leftist-progressive polity. This is how much they have disdain for Islam and are simply planning on using Islam and then discarding it once they have their desired death of Judeo-Christianity. There is only one small problem with their plans, Islam is not that easily overthrown. Once Islam reaches the point where they are ready to challenge everything the people thought was the basis for their society, there will be no alterations made to the Quran as the Islamic plan brings in Imams who will decide what Islam means and what good Muslims are called upon to perform. Just for your information, the top of the list is to perform Jihad followed by assisting those who are Jihadists and next are those who finance the Jihadists and on down the line to the lower ranks such as providing shelter for the Jihadists both before and after their attacks have been executed. There is no room in Islam for a competing set of principles and those attempting such an alteration to Islam would be accused of heresy and potentially be considered to be apostates, neither is a desirable end. But the West in now too comfortable in their belief of their superiority, especially the progressives as was proven by their continued disbelief that Hillary Clinton lost to Donald Trump. Imagine their absolute unraveling should President Trump be reelected beating, choose your favorite Democrat here. But not to fret, President Trump cannot remain in the White House beyond either two or six years depending on the 2020 elections. Eventually the leftist Progressive wing of the Democrat Party will win the White House and very possibly both houses of Congress along with it. Then the real leftist-progressive policies will get their chance to prove that the Democrats really are the people who know how to implement socialism and make it work. If they are able to do so, they will be the first and we do not hold out high hopes that they will succeed. Do not get us wrong, they will attempt to implement socialism and may even go the full route and decide that their superior knowledge and political beliefs are reason enough for them remaining in power until they get that socialist thing perfected. That is providing that Islam has not taken control of the United States, as they will also bring on a socialist form of governance. Their form of socialism is that the elite get everything and the rest get next to nothing, picture Gaza or Iran, Syria, Libya, Bahrain, Saudi Arabia and all of the Islamic run nations which have little if any oil wealth. Under Islam it is difficult to tell if it is Islam or socialism which drives their levels of poverty and the great disparity in wealth between those connected to the power and everyone else. We can imagine a day when Americans remember fondly the days when President Trump sat in the White House, but this claim will raise the ire of most leftists who strayed in their journey and landed here. Perhaps this might serve as a warning for them, though we highly doubt such would be the case. But be warned, as forewarned is forearmed.

 

Beyond the Cusp

 

March 28, 2019

And They Are Astonished and Shocked People Found Fault

 

One of the most shocking articles we have read of late was titled so appropriately, “Um, What?! Sarsour Is Triggered…By Those Condemning Omar’s Anti-Semitic Remarks.” The article included Ms. Sarsour’s Tweet over her shock and amazed astonishment that people were actually “piled on Representative Ilhan Omar” and that this had “incited a hate mob against her” claiming further that Ms. Omar had received “assassination threats” demanding that people “reflect on how you contribute to Islamophobia” then demanding it be brought to a halt. The problem with her Tweet is that it is so rich in the usual excuses, the same old threats and the attempt to turn the tables making the victim the threat and those, or in this case, the person, who started with threats, is now the victim. This is classic Taqiyya, lying for the advancement of Islam and protecting its delicate little terror inciting against those who would dare question or criticize any Islamic believer. This is almost as rich as the first and most used phrase spread as Taqiyya most ardently by President George W. Bush after 911 when he came out and stated repeatedly, “Islam is the religion of peace,” and went further with another Islamic canard stating, “This (referring to the 911 attacks) is not representative of real Islam,” which he would then cap off with the first example pairing the two together. The methodology of Islam in their efforts to replace any governing body with Sharia which is a body of law from the Quran and Hadiths which places the true believers over those lesser human beings who have yet to adopt the sole faith permitted. We discussed the Islamic path taking them from their initial contact on through to total control and all that entails in this article in relative depth. We even included a nice attractive illustrative version of the steps utilized.

 

Linda Sarsour’s Tweet Expressing Shock Concerning Reaction to Ilhan Omar’s Anti-Semitism

Linda Sarsour’s Tweet Expressing Shock Concerning Reaction to Ilhan Omar’s Anti-Semitism

 

So, Linda Sarsour was triggered by the protestations against the hate speech by Ilhan Omar before the House of Representatives. Triggered, unless one is up on the newspeak which has been introduced so as to limit our ability to communicate any political or social positions the new masters of all that is good wish to eradicate, this idea of triggered may be a new term, so here we will provide a short definition. Triggered means more than what one might attribute to it initially as it is obvious it means that one reacted with shock and amazement at some act, speech or other human activity or even something as commonplace as the wrong type of person appearing where they would be unwelcomed and unexpected. But this word goes even further as it is reserved for the use by those who are to be our overseers in the near future and only by those who are identified with the left and the radical left at that. Islam is about as far left as one can get, or so they are touting themselves. Social justice warriors are often if not perpetually triggered by almost everything they see, especially in the United States. The greatest triggering item is the personage of President Trump. Many people claim that simply hearing the name “Trump” is sufficient to trigger them. Some people when triggered go on the attack as Ms. Sarsour did with her Tweet, while others go to their “safe space” where they can use coloring books, pet puppies, listen to soothing music tailored to their tastes, receive counseling to help calm them plus anything else they may need. When President Trump won the 2016 election, there were entire colleges which were triggered to the point that final exams were cancelled to be rescheduled after everybody had received the proper and needful counseling and had recovered from the excessive shock they had suffered. The interesting thing about those events was that they naturally assumed that every student was on the left supporting Hillary Clinton if not the Green Party and that with the fine education, read indoctrination, these students had been provided, read subjected, they would naturally follow their professors and their teaching and have become good little leftists. This is something which should concern anybody who believes that making a profit is not evil and that with greater position and greater responsibility comes greater rewards or salary and do not believe that everybody has exactly the same worth and thus a brain surgeon should not be paid any more or less than a stocking clerk.

 

Linda Sarsour is herself a piece of work. She is an subversive Islamist who works to facilitate Islam becoming the ruling elite in the world with her specialty being the United States. Her immediate call of Islamophobia is textbook leftist, Saul Alinsky tactics straight out of Rules for Radicals. There it teaches that if attacked for something which you are not capable of defending; act hurt and pretend that you are the victim and never the accuser or initiator of anything controversial. Further, if one can use words which will place them within a protected group, in this case followers of Islam, then all the better as then one can insist that they not be criticized as they were simply doing what was normative in their culture, and all cultures are equal as we all know (smirk). That was exactly what Ms. Sarsour was doing with her reference to Islamophobia. We really like the overuse of “phobia” and specifically with Homophobia and Islamophobia. We cannot speak for our readers though we suspect that only the tiniest of a minority of them fear homosexuals and probably only a slightly greater group are afraid of Muslims as a rule. When we grew up, words had exact meanings which were never supposed to change and you could figure out the meaning of many words by breaking them down and looking at the independent parts. Today the world is full of Humpty Dumptys who believe as did he that, “When I use a word, it means just what I choose it to mean-neither more nor less.” Through restricting vocabulary through the use of “Whole Word Recognition,” in the school systems and redefining words so they no longer represent what they had a generation previous, the left is slowly making debate on the issues they stand behind completely impossible for the next generation who will be horrifically stunted in their ability for free thought. This is not an original idea as it was explained in George Orwell’s classic “1984” where the word newspeak received its definition. In the fascist, leftist society in which the book is set, Big Brother oversees all and monitors all. The schools teach the children only the words they wish them to use and they have dumbed down the language by ridding the vernacular by ridding it of obsolete and unnecessary words making everyone happier and simplifying their lives. The story reveals that the government regularly will deem a word offensive and dangerous making its use forbidden and into a crime. This also makes work for people going through all books, essays, films and other forms for communication and removing the offensive word replacing it with the soft new word which might actually alter the meaning of the sentence or even the entire work making it fall within accepted boundaries approved by the government, Big Brother.

 

The next part of Ms. Sarsour’s shock at people objecting to the anti-Semitism expressed by Ilhan Omar was to claim that there had been threats on her life. This is another ploy performed for two reasons, first to gain sympathy and second to label all who comment against her speech into murderous villains who are assisting in the future killing of Ms. Omar, something which is highly unlikely to ever come to fruition. Further, there have been no recordings of these threats, no call for police to investigate such threats and absolutely no evidence for such threats as they are unlikely to have happened. People who are Conservative in their politics are often reserved in their lives and are not the type to make physical threats and especially not to make death threats; these are the people who believe in intellectual debate as the best means for settling differences, not elimination of their opposition, that is a fascist concept. But this is all part of playing the victim. The new means of gaining power is to be the most attacked and prejudiced against person in the room, then you win. Life has become very similar to a form of poker called Low-Ball where whomever has the worst hand, wins. There are no straights and no flushes so Ace-2-3-4-5 is the best hand possible unless you are using the jokers which gets confusing, so we will skip that part of today’s lesson. Yes, we know this is not a lesson but simply our one-sided start for a discussion which can be further carried out through the comments you may wish to add. Where this article started and will go, we expect at least one or two upset leftists.

 

Religiously Biased Hate Crimes 2012-2016 Anti-Semitism and Anti-Islamic

 

What is interesting about Linda Sarsour’s attempt to silence all objection to Islam defined for all to see is easily attributed to her efforts to cast Islam as the religion of peace and where terrorist acts are forbidden and place these two pillars as the base supporting everything else she states about Islam. Ilhan Omar opened up a can of worms for Ms. Sarsour as she had to come behind Ms. Omar and clean up the Islamic reality spilling out for all to see before anybody had a chance to realize that Islam is about conquest and domination and not peace or acceptance of others. Ms. Sarsour was hoping that because Ilhan Omar’s target was Israel, Zionists and Jews that people might be slower to realize exactly what she was stating plainly, that Islam must be the central guide for the United States and the world. She was saying the exact same mantra we hear in Israel coming from Hamas, Fatah, Iran, Erdogan and so many other Islamic leaders that here there is no escaping the truth. This different perspective about Islam is a large part of the disconnect between Israeli and American Jews. The interesting reality which became so excessively evident by the watered down and weak admonition which the House passed as a resolution called for an end to every version of “hate crime” that they could possibly think exists and equated Islamic hate crimes with anti-Semitic hate crimes. There is no comparison between what is called Islamophobia and anti-Semitism and despite what all the caterwauling and kvetching about Islamophobia, hate crimes against the Jews are committed at a rate over three and a half times as frequent as hate crimes against Muslims and even higher compared to any other group.

 

Hate Crimes Motivated by Religious Bias for 2016

 

The thing is, we actually applaud Ilhan Omar for coming out into the open and announcing her hatreds for all to see. We wish every anti-Semite were as honest in their hatred as Ms. Omar so we would know who they are. Yes, hatred is a terrible emotion to hold, especially without cause. We are willing to wager that Ilhan Omar has never been victimized by a Jew and that even a majority of the Jews in her district supported her against her Republican opponent. We do know she was graciously received by Jewish groups when she met and spoke to them telling them how she held no hatred towards Jews and supported the same ideas and ideals as they held. Do we really need to even tell that these were words spoken as Taqiyya in order to gain their trust and their support through their votes. We did not think it was necessary. Now that the cat is out of the bag, there has been an urgent seeking of somebody to run against Ms. Omar in the Democrat primaries within her district. These efforts have not produced one willing to try to defeat her and this is likely due to the excessively large number of Somalis who were placed within her district such that they are close to being a majority and are definitely a plurality. We have heard from people here in Israel and from contacts and friends in the United States claiming that obviously Ilhan Omar as well as Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez will not be reelected in the next election. We have once again needed to be the bearer of bad news as we believe that both will probably be with us in the Congress for the foreseeable future and will defend their seats winning easily. The only hope of unseating either of these Representatives, as well as a few select others who have drawn criticism over their overt acts, would be to defeat them in a primary for as long as they are the Democrat candidate, they are guaranteed of a victory. Things are changing faster and faster. As we have noted before, we have seen these changes approaching since the mid-1960’s when people looked at us and simply claimed that we required psychiatric help. It is a good thing we do not have the inclination to confront these people today and ask them if they can see the writing on the wall. Unfortunately, if they are like the majority of American Jews and all too many Israeli Jews, their reply would be, what wall? This has been the reaction consistently and we do not see this changing until they are confronted with the inevitable results crashing into their lives in a violent manner. It is a form of willful blindness and there is no cure for this affliction. The main difference between Israeli Jews and American Jews is far less when one removes religious observance from the picture. Both believe that America is the new Promised Land along side Israel, that the two nations will never part their present friendship, that life in the United States is more comfortable with greater wealth and a host of other truths and fables about America. The difference is that American Jews believe that residing in Israel is inviting trouble and far too dangerous to even consider leaving the warm, loving, adoring life in America for the troubles and threats faced in Israel while Israeli Jews reside in Israel and know that the dangers are mostly over reported which blows them all out of proportion and that if, just as in America, you keep away from those areas where danger is more common, your life is rather safe. This is validated by this report which compares numerous crime statistics and is surprisingly revealing.

 

Beyond the Cusp

 

Next Page »

Blog at WordPress.com.