Beyond the Cusp

February 3, 2014

Abbas Lays Plan to Turn American Public Against Israel

The somewhat brilliant idea behind Palestinian Authority leader Mahmoud Abbas’s plan is that the offer is one that United States Secretary of State is very likely to jump at accepting it blindly without any consideration for the possible down-sides and future difficulties it will most assuredly spawn. Abbas has suggested that he will accept to have a demilitarized Palestinian state with the IDF initially tasked with preventing any terrorist activities and defending the Palestinians from outside aggressions. After five years the IDF will have been phased out and replaced by NATO, read United States, troops who will be permitted to remain indefinitely, a length of time that would likely be adjusted to speed up the transition to sometime during year three. One of the main reasons behind Abbas proposing this plan is that he is fully aware that without some external security force to defend him against suffering the exact same fate that the Palestinian Authority did in Gaza, he would soon be deposed as the Palestinian President by Hamas and other presumably more radical terrorist groups who would waste little time in executing Abbas and most of the other current Palestinian Authority leadership. So, in actuality the NATO troops who would be tasked with providing security throughout the Palestinian state would actually end up fulfilling two functions, the first as protectors of the Palestinian Authority leadership and the second to provide targets for assaults and murderous attacks by the terrorists.

 

I realize that the two disparate functions at first would appear contradictory. That will be cleared up as we inspect the real motivations behind this apparent and sudden change of heart and apparent desire to make compromises. The initial driving force behind the newly accommodating Mahmoud Abbas is his realization that he might be able to game the system being put in place if only he can wrap his plot up with a pretty enough bow that Secretary Kerry will grab the ring and run with it never even suspecting he was being played. Once this plan for providing Israel with sufficient assurances their security would be well protected by sufficient presence of non-Palestinian forces and at the same time satisfy, and thus removing, Israeli Prime Minister’s demand that the Palestinian state be demilitarized, then there can come either a totally staged or instigated confrontation, likely series of confrontations over a week or two, where evidence can be produced revealing inappropriate use of excessive force along with the death of innocents including children, a ploy previously used in the French media report of the al-Dura murder by IDF forces engaged with Palestinian forces or the Jenin massacre which the United Nations ended up investigating and disproving all the Palestinian claims. The timing of this staged event and ensuing outrage will likely come mere weeks or even days before the opening session of the United Nations General Assembly so the Palestinians can present their grievances to the world in order to get backing for the removal of the IDF forces earlier than agreed to in the Kerry framework and hurriedly put NATO, read American, troops as peacekeepers and security forces.

 

The changing of the guard in the Palestinian areas will be a somewhat tumultuous series of events which will likely leave open a number of opportunities for terrorists to strike within Israel before everything has settled in. Then comes the six to ten months of peaceful calm leading the NATO American troops to let their guards down and putting aside any suspicions or fears that they were entering a hostile environment. The aggressions aimed at the foreign troops will start small and not be fatal but will cause little alarm. The Palestinians will slowly elevate the levels of violence and frequency of attacks slowly with intermittent periods of calm implemented in order to prevent the situation from boiling over quite yet. Eventually there will be an incident in which one of the NATO troops is killed. The situation surrounding his or her death will be murky and unclear leaving doubts as to who was responsible or if the soldier in question simply was somewhere he should not have been. There will also be charges against some of the troops for improper behavior such as rapes and other indiscretions and the Palestinian leadership and supporting sections of the population feigning great indignations. Eventually the suggestion will be made and applied to make the patrols manned by Palestinian security police alongside the NATO forces under the reasoning that the presence of the Palestinians can assist in defusing any confrontation and assure that Palestinian sensitivities are protected and certain lines are not crossed.

 

At a predetermined time these associate security forces will make themselves scarce just before an attack by terrorists is launched on the NATO troops. Should there be any Palestinian individuals who are suspect of being too friendly and working with the NATO forces, they too will be murdered in some of these attacks. The initial assault will take place over a three to five day span with as many as ten to twenty such attacks and double to triple that many fatalities. Then Mahmoud Abbas will make some speech and everything will return to a quiet calm. These episodes will come every four to six months initially and slowly ramp up until there are four or five every month with at least one being a serious terrorist attack which will target a NATO instillation, base or staging post with the casualties being considerably greater resulting from these attacks. On rare occasions the Palestinians will capture one of the terrorists and place them on trial resulting in their being executed for their purported crimes. The suspected terrorist will never be allowed to be interrogated by the NATO forces and will likely be some unfortunate innocent or a member of a rival terrorist group of Fatah such as Hamas, Islamic Jihad or other group or family force. The aim of this entire scenario will be to drive a wedge between the American people and Israel eroding the current levels of support Israel enjoys from the American public. This situation will play right into the hands of those who harbor anti-Semitic hatreds as it will prove their charge of Israel making American men and women fight and die in their place fighting the Israeli and Jewish enemies. If anyone thinks this is impossible, all you need do is watch many of the major liberal arts universities such as the California University System, Columbia and Harvard where the campus Hillel House actually voted to back the BDS (boycott, divestment and sanctions) movement which target Israel for their supposed apartheid and genocidal treatment of the Palestinians and their refusal to allow the formation of a Palestinian state with Jerusalem as its capital city.

 

Numerous campuses throughout the United States, Europe, Canada and other Western nations hold annual Israel Apartheid Week, Palestinian Solidarity Celebrations and other anti-Israel, anti-Zionist and anti-Semitic events replete with moralistic plays, Apartheid Walls, Faux Checkpoints and other distortions all designed to discredit Israel and accuse Israel and the Jewish students by association of crimes against humanity, overt control of media and entertainment, inordinate influence over the United States Congress along with national parliaments and ruling bodies worldwide, and numerous other hate filled tropes. It must be remembered that these very same students who are being influenced by these events and the supportive literature which is often disseminated on campuses will be the leaders of society in a decade or two and some who had their beliefs and opinions of Israel are already out in the government and institutions of higher learning as well as public schools, newspapers, television and other media corrupting the message slanting everything to serve to hold the Palestinians up as oppressed and disadvantaged victims of the fascist, colonialist Israeli Jews. What surprises many is that a fair number of Church diocese and synods have had their board of directors infiltrated and populated by a majority of individuals who support the BDS movement and other organizations along with numerous NGOs all united in a common front to denounce and attempt to eventually extinguish the Jewishness of the state of Israel and make it just another Arab Muslim state of the Middle East. Should America’s men and women who are serving their country during the prime of their lives become the daily targets for terrorists while on mission presumably to defend Israel, these same indoctrinated masses will use these deaths as their cause celeb of which they will talk loudly while also carrying a big stick. This is very probably close to the intentions planned by Mahmoud Abbas and is pushing his sudden acquiescence with Kerry’s efforts after spending the past six months plus deriding Secretary Kerry and denouncing his plans as untenable and being crafted in congruence with the Israelis to destroy the hopes of the Palestinians.

 

Beyond the Cusp

 

August 16, 2013

Is This Obama’s Dangerous Plan for Israel?

Filed under: 1949 Armistice Line,1967 Borders,24/7 News Reporting,Act of War,Administration,Amalekites,Anti-Israel,Anti-Semitism,Anti-Zionist,Appeasement,Arab World,Arabist,Blood Libel,Borders,Boycott,Bullying,Civilization,Colonial Possession,Commander in Cheif,Condemning Israel,Defend Israel,Defense Department,Disengagement,Divided Jerusalem,Domestic NGOs,Economic Sanctions,Europe,European Governments,European Union,Executive Order,Forced Solution,Foreign Funding,Foreign NGOs,Gaza,General Assembly,General Martin Dempsey,Government,Green Line,Hamas,Hate,History,Holy Sites,International Politics,Intifada,Islam,Islamic State,Israel,Israeli Capital City,Jerusalem,Jewish Heritage,Jewish Home,Jewish Leadership,Jewish State,Jews,Jihad,John Kerry,Joint Chiefs of Staff,Jordan River,Jordan Valley,Judea,Judean Hills,Kotel,Land for Peace,Mahmoud Abbas,Mainstream Media,Meaning of Peace,Media,Media Censorship,Mediterranean Sea,Middle East,Military Intervention,Military Intervention,Military Option,Myth,NATO,Negev Desert,Obama,Old City,Oppression,Palestinian,Palestinian Authority,Partition Plan,Peace Process,Peacekeepers,Permanenet Members,PFLP,Political Talk Shows,Politics,Pre-Conditions,President,President Obama,Prime Minister,Prisoner Release,Promised Land,Refugee Camp,Refugees,Right of Return,Rock Throwing,Rocket Attacks,Saeb Erekat,Samaria,Sanctions,Secretary of Defense,Secretary of State,Security Council,Settlements,Society,State Department,Statehood,Strong Sanctions,Talking Heads,Tel Aviv,Temple Mount,Temple Mount,Terror,Terrorist Release,Third Intifada,Two State Solution,United Nations,United States,United States Pressure,Veto Power,West Bank,Western Wall,Western World,Window for Peace,World Opinion,World War III,Yasser Arafat,Zionism,Zionist — qwertster @ 4:05 AM
Tags: , , , , , , , , , ,

At the end of yesterday’s article we opined on the rumors that President Obama has given Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu guarantees that there will be peacekeeping troops placed in the areas which Israel releases for the formation of the Palestinian state in order to prevent terrorist strikes or rockets and mortars being launched into Israel as is done by Hamas out of Gaza. The soldiers manning the peacekeeping forces would come from any of the following; only United States, NATO countries, or even the United Nations. It is likely that Israel would prefer not to depend on either the United Nations or any of the European nations, so such a force will most likely be manned by Americans. We would like to express our distress should these rumors have even one iota of credibility and beseech that no foreign troops be placed in a position where they are presumed to be protecting Israel. The potential for horrific results and of so many ways such a situation could turn out ugly that it would be best to never even tempt fate and disaster so brazenly.

 

Thinking and researching further on these rumors we came across other ideas of where the Israeli-Palestinian peace negotiations may be headed should the talks themselves fail to reach an agreement. Some of this information we gleaned from a number of sources painted a picture that was very distressing. The negotiations which are currently in progress were entered with Prime Minister Netanyahu offering to impose a building freeze over almost all of the West Bank but Palestinian Authority Chairman Abbas refused that offer and instead substituted the demand for the one-hundred-four terrorist prisoners serving life sentences and already having served the longest of Palestinian prisoners to be released in groups as the negotiations proceeded and progress was attained. When Israel agreed after a fair amount of distress and many demonstrations by the Israeli people against such a release of murderous terrorists, especially the relatives of those murdered by these very terrorist prisoners, Netanyahu informed Abbas and the rest of the Palestinian leadership about the imminent announcement of Israeli construction in the settlement blocks which have been agreed since the beginning were to remain under Israeli rule and were part of the land swaps to be formalized through negotiations. So, all the screaming and protesting, posturing and threatening, condemnations and petitioning the world to also condemn Israeli construction plans was a put on act as there was no surprise and they had already approved the Israeli construction. The whole intent of the Palestinian show of rage at the Israeli announcement of new housing was perpetrated in order to draw further condemnations and maybe even stimulate more nations to place Israel under sanctions or other political isolations and restrictions and their plotting worked as planned as the European Union took the opportunity to place an embargo on all Israeli products from the settlement blocks responding to the Palestinian temper tantrum act.

 

In order to fully understand the end game that President Obama may be planning to execute, one has to understand that President Obama is determined to be the person who forges a Palestinian state and an end to the Arab-Israeli animosities. Another fact that needs to be understood is the entire scheme of the Palestinians from the very outset of the entire Palestinian-Israeli conflict has been to never agree to any solution and continuing the fraud all the while conducting a concentrated, well planned, and well supported propaganda campaign to demonize the Israelis and glorify the idea of the Palestinians as the victims of horrendous treatment under Israeli occupation. The intent the whole while was to take the historic story behind the history of the Jewish people and forge a Palestinian mystique that paralleled the Jews story and use the same ideas right down to using some of the same terms such as the “Right of Return”. The end target the Palestinians are seeking is to have forced mediation and settlement from the United Nations with the Security Council using Article 33 through 37 of the United Nations Charter. One more part of the Palestinians plans is to, as much as possible, have the Israelis treated as the obstacle to finding a peace agreement which they have depended on two main items, first that as they have shown a resolute refusal to bend in even the slightest manner that nobody bothers to place any demands on the Palestinian forcing all compromises to be forced out of the Israelis, and second they have depended on the historic suspicions of the Jewish people and anti-Semitism especially amongst the Muslim world and the Europeans as well as many on the extreme left politically. Using this multi-front attack the Palestinians have managed to successfully attain most of their targets to a sufficient amount that the only thing left for them to accomplish is to convert the United States leadership to turn against Israel in the Security Council and allow for the United Nations and the rest of the world in support force a solution on Israel which grants the Palestinians everything they could ever have asked for.

 

This target may be within sight, or at worst just around the corner. Secretary of State Kerry and President Obama have both been pressing Prime Minister Netanyahu stressing the point that should these last gasp attempts not produce a peace between Israel and the Palestinians with the formation of Palestine to the Palestinians’ satisfaction then Israel may just find themselves completely isolated and friendless amongst the nations of the world. This has been the reason and message behind the constant repetition that there is a limited window of opportunity for peace to be negotiated. The critically important phrase is ‘limited window’ as it implies that should these negotiations fail, then there is no longer any way of reaching a peace through negotiations. If negotiations can be declared defunct and useless to pursue any further, then the only way to solve such a situation is where the United Nations Charter sets out the requirements and the steps in order to impose an equitable peace as determined by mediation by the United Nations. President Obama had made references to the potential need to impose a peace on the Palestinian-Israeli situation in some talks he held during his first term with some of the Arab rulers and also with Abbas. Add to that, Abbas has made mention of the approaching situation where it may be necessitated to impose a peace agreement on Israel by a coming together of the world to solve this otherwise intractable problem.

 

So, exactly how would things proceed if the end result being aimed for is a solution by agreement or imposition or however it turns out is required? These negotiations will reach close to their nine-month time limit with no complete resolution attained but with some progress has been attained as there is a requirement for progress in order for the Palestinian terrorist murderers to be released by Israel. The ninth month arrives without any treaty so there is a call to make one last six-month push as the two sides are so close. As per usual, the Palestinians refuse to return to continue the negotiations holding out until some preconditional demand or two are forced out of the Israelis. The likely demand will be for the continuation of the Palestinian terrorist prisoner release likely leading to virtually every terrorist is freed and of course there would now be the call for a building freeze and finally there might be a possible demand for Israel to remove some of the Israelis in the furthest settlements that exist in Area B. After six weeks of strenuous and exhausting negotiations with Secretary of State Kerry making two a week trips to the Middle East or at least somebody from the State Department or Defense Department and possibly a guarantee of sale of some desired weapons for the Israelis and the negotiations recommence. The six weeks pass and instead of progress even things that had been resolved during the nine-month negotiations are no longer settled as the Palestinians go back on agreements and then claim the Israelis have been dealing deceitfully and misrepresenting what was already agreed to because they are refusing to meet their obligations. This is a repeat of previous acts performed by Abbas and by Yasser Arafat before him. When everything blows up with Abbas and Erekat both storming from the negotiations and holding a well-polished and fully practiced press conference where they denounce the Israelis for deceitful negotiating methods, relenting on agreements and every other possible sin one can commit breaking any good-faith negotiations. The mainstream world media runs headlines for a week denouncing Israel for blowing up any hope for peace and then comes the trip by Abbas to the United Nations demanding that the Security Council recognize Palestine and force Israel to comply with their obligations. This time the United States abstains rather than using their veto and the rest is, as they say, obvious. The world turns their forces towards Israel and the entirety of the world, with possibly a few exceptions, all scramble to provide troops to assist the Palestinians in cleansing their territory of any Israeli presence and forcing Israel to retreat at best back to the 1949 Armistice Lines and who knows what could be worse. One must remember that there have been votes taken in the General Assembly of the United Nations where Zionism was equated with Racism and another time to repeal the November 1948 Partition Plan which led to the declaration establishing the state of Israel the following May 14, 1949. What would prevent the United Nations from deciding to replace Israel with the state called Palestine rather than merely forming Palestine alongside Israel?

 

Beyond the Cusp

 

Create a free website or blog at WordPress.com.

%d bloggers like this: