Beyond the Cusp

September 28, 2016

Debate One; Hillary the Destroyer

 

Hillary Clinton probably won the first debate hands down. She managed to make Donald Trump be on the defensive from the word go through to the concluding remarks. She used innuendo, smear, accusations and a steady diet of calling him a liar, cheat and some old favorites such as ‘bait and switch’ and ‘fact check’ this, that and the other. And where were we to go to fact check these presumed lies? Well, to Hillary’s web site where she had real fact checkers who were unbiasedly giving out the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth. There was no way these fact checkers were from her campaign staff or that they might also need fact checking as they labeled everything Donald likely said, including the, ‘a’, ‘and’, ‘the’ and ‘good evening’ as being false. What was wrong with good evening, well it was not necessarily good and it was not evening everywhere the debate was being watched, it was 4:00 AM where I watched it and I have to agree that it was not good, I would much rather have continued sleeping. And I watched it again the past afternoon just to make sure no biases played a role in critiquing this as this is an editorial site, not the New York Times, which actually is also an editorial site. Hillary basically was a bulldog who had just been given a Donald Trump chew toy soaked in gravy.

 

Donald appeared startled by the initial assaults and the torrents which followed. He appeared to have believed the debate would be civil. He was the obvious non-political hard-nosed attack drone. He was also the obvious target of exactly that. He tried defending himself and was often reminded it was Hillary’s turn to defame and he should take it like a good little chew toy. Trump missed almost every opportunity to attack Hillary and often to do so with substance. On cyber security her e-mails hardly were mentioned. On policy there were slight mentions on her foreign policy disasters and her lack of fixing anything in her thirty years in politics, though much of those thirty years she had accomplished being her husband’s defense against charges of severe womanizing and even rape and of having attacked viciously any woman who claimed any improprieties. Trump never mentioned Benghazi and stuck mostly to Libya and Syria and did accuse her and President Obama of setting the stage for the formation of ISIS and then remaining inactive when it could have been destroyed early on. She blamed George W. Bush for setting the date for their pulling out the troops and Iraq for not delivering on demand at the twelfth hour guaranteed protection of American servicemen and women which they simply accepted without any form of argument or rebuttal demanding or even pleading, they simply responded, OK, we will leave if that is what you and your Iranian minders desire as we would not desire to impede Iran in taking over most of Iraq as we are actually Iranian Manchurian candidates and work for them. On Iran, Donald Trump did hit Hillary on that deal which was not entirely true as the final mess was more attributed to John Kerry, her successor, and President Obama.

 

When All You Have is Some Simple Slogan, that's it!!

 

The theme for the night was largely Trump is a liar and not allowing him the latitude or grace granted Clinton. She was granted far wider interruption rights and running over on her two minute limit, or it seemed so while Trump was more often remanded for interrupting and being informed it was Hillary’s turn and he need be quiet before he would be made to go sit in the corner. The moderator remained otherwise fair until the closing moments when Lester Holt joined in with Hillary Clinton in demeaning Donald Trump accusing him of womanizing, spookily hanging around beauty pageants, and calling one contestant a ‘pig’ and a variety of other misadventures and attacks, verbal in nature, against women and general debasing women. This came conveniently soon after accusing Trump of racial segregation in a housing project and being taken to court over the racial profiling and rejection of minorities. What was removed was context. Donald had just been given these properties to manage, he settled the case, ended all such profiling across the board and has never shown any racial, religious or other such improprieties in anything he has done his entire career even when advised it would make business sense to do so. Both accusations were low blows and the womanizing came when he would not be allowed a rebuttal and to have such come from the facilitator of William Jefferson Clinton’s career womanizing and proven improprieties was beyond surreal.

 

Here is our advice for Hillary. Try appearing more human and that smile does not have to be there all mechanoid-like as if it is programmed onto your face. Do not be so stiff in your movements as if you are constantly running through facts and figures looking up your next line to speak and what defamations from a list fit the subject to lead off with and which one to close with as there must be an attack at the front and back of each segment to prevent Donald from refuting both or if doing so not being able to give his positions any fleshing out in his allotted time. Relax some and use different meters when talking otherwise you may start rumors you were home with pneumonia and that was an advanced attack drone or android in your place. Furthermore, the world is not your enemies with the only trustable people are those paid to take your side. Try a smidge of humor every now and then as that is what a normal person does and most politicians attempt to emulate normal human beings. Lastly, breathe between sentences as otherwise we are back to the robotic android appearance. We can live with the never let up and always attack, attack, attack until the target resembles pancake batter. Continue stressing your plan to tax the rich and give to the rest claiming the Robin Hood award for generosity (though Robin Hood stole from those who were ruling and taxing the poor and gave it back to the taxpayers, not exactly your plan but most people are unaware of this and only know the song where he took from the rich and gave to the poor never mentioning the rich were the government of the time).

 

Here is our advice for Donald. Spend less time on defense and more on attack. Hillary has more faults than California and some of them can and will cause the BIG One. Bring these faults up regularly with one somewhere within each segment and they can and should be repeatable and used more than once. Benghazi, that is one of the most touchy. Always mention and remind people that Hillary’s tax the rich includes households making a combined income of over fifty-thousand dollars and that the middle class to her are those making under twenty-four thousand a year households which pretty much rules out all married couples where both work. Allude to the fact that should she raise the minimum wage to $15.00 an hour that that would make a household with two minimum wage workers borderline wealthy and that it will cost around half a million in lost minimum wage jobs. Point out how you will be best served should the minimum wage be increased to $15.00 an hour to replace as many minimum wage workers with automated systems and thus have zero minimum wage employees and that Wendy’s and other fast food restaurants are already heading in that direction out of fear of such a minimum wage increase. Pound her berating Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu for over half an hour demanding he surrender to President Obama’s disastrous plan to make the entire West Bank into another Gaza and give the land away without a single guarantee except that President Obama and Hillary promises that the Palestinians would behave nice, despite Mahmoud Abbas promises to do the exact opposite and continue the terror attacks. Bring up her disgraceful defense of President Clinton and his known sexual escapades and mention Monica Lewinski, Gennifer Flowers, Eileen Wellstone, Paula Jones, Kathleen Willey, Juanita Broaddrick, Dolly Kyle, Sally Perdue, and Elizabeth Ward Gracen. You have played the gentleman, now play the respectable man who is simply telling truths and not attempting to hurt this poor, innocent, defenseless woman. Use facts and invite people to fact check your accusations themselves and not rely on your or Hillary’s so-called fact checkers as they are paid employees, both yours and hers. Take a slight hit to give an even bigger one and take away her check my fact checkers as they are honest to the last dollar spent on them. Remember the disasters such as ISIS, Benghazi, Libya in general, Syria, the Red Line fiasco with chemical weapons with Bashir al-Assad, demeaning the Israeli Prime Minister, the Iran Deal, and of course the e-mails, their erasure when a court ordered them turned over, and how any regular citizen would be spending life in prison if they skirted justice and flaunted her refusal to obey the court and get away with it.

 

“What difference, at this point, what difference does it make?”

 

Our advice to the American People is for them to watch all the debates, even the Vice-Presidential debate and choose wisely as more than the United States rests in the balance of their choice. There is a force reawakening and the last time it awakened it almost conquered Europe if not for two battles in different times and places, one in Tours on October 10, 732, where the hero was Charles “The Hammer” Martellus (Martel) and the other two hundred years later give or take at Vienna on September 12, 1683, where the hero was King of Poland John III Sobieski. Now Europe is almost lost and if they are to make a comeback it will require a number of dedicated changes and new leaders in the mold of the Dutch Parliamentarian Geert Wilders, actress Bridgette Bardot and others and once again the great assistance from the standard of freedoms, the United States. Yes, America will likely be called to save the western Liberal World once again and hopefully this one will be the last though that may never be possible.

 

Beyond the Cusp

 

Advertisements

September 17, 2015

Ann Coulter Commentary on Republican Debate, Israel and the Jews, Twitter

Sometimes one need simply post the commentary. We have omitted commentary from people other than Ms. Coulter as most are not public figures and I am too impatient to chase each one down and get their permission to use their tweets (even if such is not required, it is something I would hope would be afforded me).
(Tweets rearrange to provide oldest on top to newest at the bottom)

****************************************

Ann Coulter ‏@AnnCoulter 4h4 hours ago
Good grief! Huckabee is running for PM of Israel.
354 retweets 617 favorites

Ann Coulter ‏@AnnCoulter 4h4 hours ago
Rubio running to be curator of the Reagan Museum.
205 retweets 445 favorites

Ann Coulter ‏@AnnCoulter 4h4 hours ago
Cruz, Huckabee Rubio all mentioned ISRAEL in their response to: “What will AMERICA look like after you are president.”
409 retweets 465 favorites

Ann Coulter ‏@AnnCoulter 4h4 hours ago
How many f—ing Jews do these people think there are in the United States?
1,463 retweets 1,447 favorites

Ann Coulter ‏@AnnCoulter 4h4 hours ago
Based on Census, another 300 immigrants entered the country during debate (33 per second) to vote against the GOP candidates’ tax &war plans

Ann Coulter ‏@AnnCoulter 4h4 hours ago
Christie also talks @ Israel in response to the question: What will AMERICA look like after you are president?

Ann Coulter ‏@AnnCoulter 4h4 hours ago
How to get applause from GOP donors: 1) Pledge to start a war 2) Talk about job creators 3) Denounce abortion 4) Cite Reagan 5) Cite Israel.

Ann Coulter ‏@AnnCoulter 4h4 hours ago
Can we eliminate the words “fix” from the political discussion? I prefer the word “abolish.”

Ann Coulter ‏@AnnCoulter 2h2 hours ago
Ann Coulter retweeted John Podhoretz
John Podhoretz @jpodhoretz
Holy shit, Ann. Shame on you.
38 retweets 79 favorites
Ann Coulter added,
U weren’t following tweets. About pandering on RR Israel prolife. Last Q was @ AMERICA & 4 Reps talk @ Israel AGAIN!

Ann Coulter ‏@AnnCoulter 2h2 hours ago
All GOPs = prolife, pro-Reagan, pro-Israel. Pandering on all 3 tonight was EPIC.

Ann Coulter ‏@AnnCoulter 2h2 hours ago

Ann Coulter retweeted John Podhoretz
There aren’t even that many Evangelicals to pander to (probably the intended Israel pander-recipients).

Ann Coulter ‏@AnnCoulter 2h2 hours ago
How about Huckabee, Rubio, Kasich etc talk about Israel’s sturdy and effective border fence?

Ann Coulter ‏@AnnCoulter 2h2 hours ago
No, it offends me that so much time was wasted on things all GOPs agree on.

Ann Coulter ‏@AnnCoulter 2h2 hours ago
I like the Jews, I like fetuses, I like Reagan. Didn’t need to hear applause lines about them all night.

Ann Coulter ‏@AnnCoulter 2h2 hours ago
And half the GOPS would bring the Jihadists here as “refugees.” Could they have talked about that tonight?

Ann Coulter ‏@AnnCoulter 2h2 hours ago
I had much more offensive ones!

Ann Coulter ‏@AnnCoulter 2h2 hours ago
It’s not about Jewish people; it’s about Republican panderers.

Ann Coulter ‏@AnnCoulter 2h2 hours ago
True, but if we keep importing the 3d world, no GOP will ever be elected POTUS again, just President Obamas forever.

Ann Coulter ‏@AnnCoulter 2h2 hours ago
Soon, same will be true in US and there will be no GOP president to protect Israel. So all their little speeches=0.

****************************************

 

Ann Coulter reaction to people taking exception to her tweets, they should be so lucky.

Ann Coulter reaction to people taking exception to her tweets, they should be so lucky.

 

 

OK, I hear you with the enough already. For those wishing for more, more, here’s a link and help yourself.

 

Where often one can be let to slide for making commentary on the run when it is a simple one-off, this is just the next installment of Ann Coulter and such commentary. There will be the defenders of Ms. Coulter who will quote her support for Israel and mention her support for many particular items Jewish. Where I appreciate Ms. Coulter’s support for Israel one cannot simply brush aside her numerous past comments which denounce Judaism as being a religion capable of receiving blessings from Hashem. She has made commentary that only the believers in Jesus are to be saved and everybody else will be barred from Heaven, though Ms. Coulter has phrased such rejection with more colorful and graphic prose. Her acceptance of replacement theology is something one need accept or be armored against taking offense from such if they are to be amongst the Coulter cheering and excuse brigades.

 

Where Ms. Coulter’s political views often agree with mine and likely many others, personally I have some degree difficulty with her religious stand which claims that my soul is unacceptable before Hashem and that I have been cast to the forces opposing Hashem. The one blessing I can take is that in my belief there is no such thing as opposing Hashem and what He knows is our future and the timing of every main event independent of our individual acts. Hashem will have His will imposed even if it becomes necessary to bless a donkey with language and sight capable of viewing angels on the path in order to force one to look closer as Hashem did with Balaam as he rode to be employed to curse the seed of Isaac but the words he uttered were such praise that many start their prayers repeating one of the “curses” as they recite Ma Tovu to begin their prayers. Enough of the “Rant of the Day” and thanks for tolerating my shout at the world for the day.

 

Beyond the Cusp

 

Create a free website or blog at WordPress.com.