Beyond the Cusp

April 1, 2019

Israel Declares Peace While Hamas Screams War

Filed under: Israel — qwertster @ 2:01 AM
Tags: , , , , , , , , ,


Prime Minister and Defense Minister Bibi Netanyahu informed the media that through mediation efforts by Egypt and others, an agreement has been reached with Hams. According to these reports, Israel will broaden generally the permissible range for Gaza fisherman, will liberalize the crossing of the border for goods, services and importantly once more building supplies intended for the rebuilding of areas destroyed in the past three wars and other confrontations. We feel a need to relay what has been the past result of these loosening of security and other restriction on Gaza. The increased range for the fishing industry makes the Israeli Navy’s job of monitoring the exercise of this profession which sometimes is augmented with monetary rewards for smuggling in weapons, rocket motors and other provisions for Hamas, Islamic Jihad and the other nefarious interests within Gaza. Building supplies have often been most widely utilized for the building of tunnels and command fortifications for Hamas and Islamic Jihad improving their military capabilities whenever they push Israel to the breaking point and hostilities become unavoidable. These supplies have also been utilized for the construction of infiltrations tunnels under the border into Israel where raids would be launched in order to destroy crops, structures consisting of homes, schools and businesses. These tunnels are also utilized to kidnap Israelis, most often civilians. Much to Hamas’s and Islamic Jihad’s consternation, Israeli technology has produced a method and instruments which allow for the detection of these tunnels and Israel has been destroying them before they are put into use. Israel has also begun erecting a new border barrier which will be taller and, hopefully, a double fence above ground and below ground barrier which reaches hopefully deep enough to prevent further tunneling.


Still, Israeli officials are touting this great peace arrangement as the prevention of an unnecessary war. Let us hope that they are correct but they should stand knowing that once Hamas receives their next few hundred million or even few billion dollars from Qatar, don’t they have something better to do with their oil wealth than to finance terror against Israel, Hamas and Islamic Jihad, the latter receiving their monies from Iran funneled through Qatar, will once more return to their violence and will disregard all promises made. Past performance in business is taken as an indicator for future performance providing the judgement of the market proves correct. The same can be stated for dealing with Gaza or the Palestinian Authority, how they have acted in similar situations probably is an accurate indicator of how they will act in the future. This is probably even more true here than it is in business where the market can change and buying habits revert to previous unexpected habits or may develop some new fixation unforeseen. In retail to the public one can see this change very easily as when Amazon first started, their future appeared rather shaky as the Internet had not reached its universal acceptance and use became more readily favorable to the average user. Within a decade, Amazon was among the largest consumer providers exceeded only by WalMart and a few other select businesses. Now even WalMart is the one facing a shaky future and Amazon is facing online competition which may in the future find a better means of serving the public and supplant Amazon as the top retailer. Back before the Internet became a household utility, everyone shopped at the mall and back in that day I had a comfortable living managing a chain outlet. Fortunately, I was blessed to return to school and find work in microelectronics repair with a specialty in medical and satellite communications electronics. After my stint in this field, I reached retirement and not a moment too soon. Now the production of medical devices and satellite communications subsystems has become so inexpensive that virtually every component system is simply discarded should it fail to meet specifications as it is far less expensive to produce additional subsystems than it is to hire a technician or engineer to repair the failed subsystems. By comparison, a subsystem test technician is paid possibly 20% above minimum wage while repair technicians could make, depending on the subsystems they were tasked with repairing, anywhere from three to ten times minimum wage. The lesson is that companies will use technological advances to replace or remove all need for those making the largest salaries whenever possible. This is why if the minimum wage were raised to fifteen dollars an hour, companies would invest all the funds required to produce an automated means of replacing minimum wage positions or would learn to do without the low end workers and reassign their duties to their other employees. This will make some technicians being tasked with an additional responsibility for cleaning the executive washrooms and emptying their trash whenever they have a few spare minutes.


Gazan Youth Launching Incendiary with his Sling

Gazan Youth Launching Incendiary with his Sling


So, perhaps we should take a look at what Hamas and Islamic Jihad are claiming while the Israeli leadership is touting this great peace being agreed upon and implemented over the coming week. First on our list is Deputy Hamas leader Saleh al-Arouri who exclaimed, “This is not a peace agreement with Israel, and has no connection to diplomacy. We are interested in ceasing the fighting in exchange for [Israel] lifting the siege. We expect agreements to be signed within a few days. We expect that it will happen soon – there will be understandings of calm that will reduce the siege significantly.” This comment stands in some contrast to the barely veiled threats which were floated as the final preparations were presumably underway to bringing the violence to a close. But what is Hamas leader and top terror chief saying, as his work is what the rest will base their actions. Yahya Sinwar, the leader of Hamas in the Gaza, on Saturday praised the fact that 40,000 Gazans were violently rioting along the Gaza Israel border. He was quoted stating, “Our people (the 40,000 rioters) today stuck to the basic principles, the right of return and the breaking of the siege, and they support the resistance.” His further statement included, “Our people (Hamas and Islamic Jihad terrorists) say en masse that they want to live in dignity and want to live, and they say: ‘O (Al-Qassam Brigades), beloved ones, bomb Tel Aviv.’” Sinwar insists that issue of the terrorist prisoners in Israel release is his most necessary demand and what he plans to work tirelessly to bring about. He stressed that the so-called “March of the Return” processions would continue until the siege is broken, the “right of return” is realized and all of Palestine has been redeemed. Make no mistake, by this he means all of Israel cleansed of its Jews and others who refuse to bow to Allah. Yahya Sinwar formerly headed the military wing of Hamas and make no mistake, he is the real deal, terrorist through and through and is completely behind the destruction of Israel no matter how long that takes.



What are we expecting and advise people to observe as things move forward. Israel will follow the steps agreed upon which are presumed to bring calm at long last. This was presumed to be a long-term settlement agreement between Israel and Hamas and by inference Islamic Jihad. Israel has stated repeatedly that as the ruling group in Gaza, Hamas is responsible for all of their groups as well as those of Islamic Jihad and other smaller groups. Despite this, Hamas will often claim that they are unable to prevent Islamic Jihad or the other groups from launching rockets or taking to other forms of violence. Hamas has also used some inventive reasons for rockets in the last few weeks such as bad weather and it was an accident always expecting Israel to accept even the dumbest excuses. We expect that there will be a decrease to the numbers gathering along the clash points along the border but this will be those who basically sat at a comfortable distance from the border but those launching explosives over the border and rolling burning tires and explosives at the fence attempting to breach the border will continue in number largely. There will be coverage by the international and other news groups around the world will mention the smaller numbers of those who treated the border riots as a picnic with entertainment. There will be no coverage of the continued level of violence along the border. Well, that is until the border violence reaches a point where it demands a response from Israel. At the point that Israel responds, it will be the “Breaking News” with the red banners and the urgent voice announcer blaring the news of the Israeli strikes on Gaza listing even the smallest damage and repeating every Hamas report of injuries or fatalities and only towards the end of the newscast will there be any mention of the violence against Israel from out of Gaza. We realize this sounds as a harsh criticism of the news coverage, but thanks to recent events in the United States and it spreading elsewhere, more people have realized that the news they receive is infected by a strong political slant. We can aid you one further and explain that the news is tainted by the causes which qualify as falling within the bounds of “intersectionality” which does not include Israel but supports the Palestinian cause to such an extent that they do not consider Hamas, Islamic Jihad or the PLO as terrorist groups but as legitimate representatives of their beloved Palestinian Arabs. They only begrudgingly admit that Hezballah is a terrorist groups, and that is solely because they were against those backed by the United States in Syria in the fight against Islamic State. We expect that slowly but inexorably, Hamas and Islamic Jihad will ratchet up the violence returning to launching rockets again within a couple of months. There is another situation which would be extremely problematic for all sides. As these riots have been nearly continuous for a full year, they may have become the new normal for many of the population, especially the youth who are the front line and the ones launching most of the explosives and incendiaries. Should this be the case and Hamas has lost the ability to control or prevent the rioting as many now see this as their way to express their frustration and get their feeling calmed, then the border rioting would require strong intervention to bring them to an end. Hamas proved with the protests within Gaza City demanding better living conditions which they put down with violence and a heavy hand. They would probably not use similar to end the border violence and would throw their hands up and tell Israel that they are unable to prevent the people from expressing their rage at the Israeli acts against Gaza. They, of course, never redirect aid from the people to their terror war efforts, well, at least not more than taking over three-quarters of the building supplies and all the money.


There is one wildcard in all of this, and that is Iran. Were Iran to decide, as they did last week, that by launching rockets into Israel and there not being an overt Israeli military response, that they can make Bibi Netanyahu appear impotent costing him the elections, this would result in rockets being launched into Israel at a slow but steady rate through April 9 hoping not to invoke any strong Israeli retaliation. This was the excuse last week once the truth leaked out. At least this election cycle there are no teams of Democrat Party campaign specialists here attempting to elect fellow leftists. Maybe they have finally realized that Israelis do not respond well to outside interference. Perhaps, if we can survive through the election, there might just be a period of quiet before one of the borders erupts with rockets and violent rioting or even an actual attempt at an invasion from out of Syria as Iranian leaders continue to intimate. Let us close answering the perennial question, when will there be peace in the Middle East. The first sign that peace may be coming to the Middle East will be the Arab nations plus Iran actually not fighting one another either directly or in proxy wars such as the war in Yemen where Iran is attacking Saudi Arabia under the cover of the Houthis who are taking control of the country pushing the elected government into an ever shrinking area. Once they learn to live with one another, then maybe, just maybe, they will find some means of accepting that Israel is home to stay. Until they learn to live with each other, there will be no hope of their accepting the Jewish State.


Beyond the Cusp


February 27, 2019

Answering My Most Asked Question


More than any other question is one few would expect to top my readership and friend list of questions. So, with no further buildup, here it is. Will there be a civil war in the United States. The answer in a single word is more than likely not. Much of the violence which appears to have plagued the United States has been in the major metropolitan areas and a few smaller but still main cities. These are areas which, even those in the most conservative states, are largely blue regions, also known as largely liberal and leftist areas where the Democrats basically rule the roost. As far as anti-fa instigated violence, it is mostly committed within cities and often against easily recognized chain stores such as McDonalds, Starbucks, the Gap and other smaller unit stores. They usually do not target major chain stores such as Sears, IKEA, Nordstroms or other stores which have security as the anti-fa people are interested in causing unopposed damage and violence with the exception being their attacking conservatives at Second Amendment, Republican candidate or similar rallies where they expect to be opposed by largely unarmed people. When the main people behind the violence are carefully choosing their targets in order to minimize the chance of real pushback then there is little if any possibility for any confrontation to escalate into that vital flash-point from which general violence would result. But this diagnosis holds solely through the next elections which will be Presidential Elections.


With the next Presidential elections, there will probably be additional violence above and beyond these elections. But that will still not escalate beyond the cities in which the problem will continue to exist. The real problem could come, if there is to be any problematic escalation, after the elections should President Trump win reelection carrying the Electoral College but losing the popular vote by a more than what people on the left believe reasonable margin. This has occurred before with Rutherford B. Hayes in 1876 losing the popular vote by about 4% but winning the Electoral College by 19 votes, Benjamin Harrison in 1888 winning the Electoral College by 65 votes while losing the popular vote by 90,596, and George W. Bush in 2000 where he won the Electoral College by a slim five votes after a contentious series of recounts and hanging chads in Florida and Al Gore won the popular vote by 543,895 votes. There are stories that President Trump also lost the popular vote but there are also stories which claim he won the popular vote once all votes had been tabulated so it is safe to say that it was very close. The thing is a President can win the Electoral College by winning a number of smaller states as well as Ohio, Pennsylvania, Virginia and Michigan or Wisconsin by narrow margins while the Democrat had a healthy showing while losing Texas and took over two thirds or three quarters of the popular vote in California, New York, Oregon, Washington and across most of New England thus having a very large popular vote victory. This is close to what happened in this past election except the margin in the Democrat victories in the high population states was closer to 55% to 60% and not too overwhelming. But if the above were to occur, it would be possible for the elected President under the Electoral College to lose the popular vote by tens of millions which would cause an uproar, especially in the high population states and in virtually every major city breaking out in rioting and worse. How serious such might become would depend heavily on the actions of the mayors as if they, as happened in the riots in Baltimore after the unfortunate death of a person in police custody, decided to order the police to simply attempt to contain the rioting while allowing the riots to play out, that could cause the President to use federal power to end the riots which would appear to be completely out of control. That might cause an even greater amount of disruption as it might be interpreted as being overt and being used to punish the people who did not support them in the election causing even greater violence. Where such might lead is anybody’s guess.


We still doubt that a civil war is likely in the United States unless a President decided to impose martial law and suspend elections, then there would be people fearing an end to the democratic base of government and an end to the Republic. As long as government continues under normal operation, the majority of the American public would continue to have faith that the system was still functioning, and only if the electoral system appeared to be being ignored or completely suspended would there be sufficient cause for universal upheaval. The reason there would not be a civil war in the United States short of a President usurping power by such actions as suspending the Congress or dismissal of the Supreme Court replacing these Constitutionally established institution with the rule of the President, the one person, then the concept of a nation ruled by law and not man would be turned upside down replacing it with a nation ruled by a person and not the law. This is something most of the American people would not stand by and allow to happen. Also, should a President suspend the powers of the people provided by the Bill of Rights, this too would be going a step too far and likely to cause a general upheaval from the population. Were such to be done in a slower series of measures limiting freedoms through slow steps using laws and the legal system to end freedoms, then it might be possible to bring an end to elected governance and have a dictatorial takeover of the United States. Such an erosion of freedoms might begin with laws against ‘hate speech’ which could be utilized to shut down expressions which were against the sitting government and thus allow only those supporting the strict policies of those in power to be expressed. This could be followed by restricting assembly of groups where such speech and positions which opposed those in power from occurring. Then, should those in power have such a control over the powers of government on all levels including almost every state and large city, the people who hold opinions which might unseat those in power could be brought up on charges of holding hateful positions and even begin to have criminal charges brought against opponents for having hateful thoughts. Once it can be established that people can be arrested and charged with thought crimes, then nobody would be safe and those in power would have complete and total power. They could move against the opposing party starting with their representatives in the Congress and on the Supreme Court replacing them with only people having the approved opinions and now you have a hierarchy where a select group of people holding what is defined as correct thought are the sole holders of power. This is something which would have been inconceivable in the United States just ten to twenty years ago. The problem on the horizon is that an ever-growing number of youth coming from many of the major colleges when queried if hate speech should be illegal, agree and say that free speech should only come with limitations and restrictions. This is a frightening reality which if it should continue signals the end of the American Experiment. Such a series of events starting from this and spreading to all corners of political power would cause a civil war with uncertain results.


Should sufficient officers be selected, as Generals need be approved by the Senate as they are selected presumably by the President or at least the executive branch, hold the same beliefs that free speech need not be a total right and that only certain approved speech should be free, then there has started a slippery slope to a dictatorial governance. This would not be the kind of dictatorship where one person was chosen and no further elections were held, this would be a form of dictatorship where all government positions, even elected positions, would be restricted to those who were the most correct in their ideas and thoughts. This is the opposite of what the Founding Fathers had envisioned but by simply adopting limitations of freedom of thought could come into existence. By restricting thoughts and expression through speech to a certain set of politically approved ideas and concepts, then one has also subjugated the media and limited even what religious leaders would be permitted to preach. From that point, it would be a short jump before people would be rounded up and sent for additional schooling, otherwise known as reeducation camps. Soon after such has taken place, we can predict what the next step would be, and that would be limitations on religious thought and then practice. The first ones to be selected for eradication would likely be the same as has always been the first religion for subjugation or attempted for eradication, the Jews. They may be selected along with other groups such as Evangelical Christians has been one such group which some claim would be included with the Jews should the United States turn to the dark side. The reasoning on these predictions are predicated on the belief that as the mainstay of Judeo-Christian ethos, these two groups could be considered the largest threat to be the mainstay against far leftist ideology and these theories all believe that such a thought based governance would be extreme leftist styled fascism. As such, those against abortions on demand, euthanasia, open borders, no corporate profits over half a percent, open work hours, fixed incomes, extending public lands, elimination of private vehicles, elimination of fossil fuels and whatever else one could conceive from the far-far-far-left on top of free speech as long as it agrees with the government and a similarly restricted media, after all, don’t we all love Big Brother, and doing away with privacy and full surveillance would also be implemented just to detect even the slightest indication that one was outside of group-think policies, this is where such would eventually lead. This could only be established slowly over about two decades, and that is about all that would be required as the job has been half way to accomplished with the ideas supported by far too many college graduates. The nerds would be tolerated as long as they simply quietly made everything work and minded their manners and were not too obviously nerdy.


Many people think that such an end for the United States is so far from being the America of the past two and a half centuries that it would be impossible and might be surprised if they were to become aware of what is taught in the finest of higher education, and that is slipping ever so slowly but inevitable into high school and even further. Eventually, the concept which has already begun in some region where they are not teaching children to read independently but only of approved readings. How, you ask? They are not teaching phonics and sounding out words from their spelling but whole word recognition, which works fine for words such as enough, but for most words that would not be the preferred means of reading new words. But they do not desire your reading new words because words represent ideas and ideas are very dangerous. Thoughts lead to ideas and if a child can read anything, then they can have thoughts which are uncontrolled and then they might have uncontrolled ideas which lead to undesired conclusions which then may cause difficulties, especially if they are able to express them and spread these concepts. Thus, through this new age teaching methods using whole word recognition, children grow up with limited vocabularies and thus have free thought stolen from their lives. They have a new form of math that they teach. They teach children to solve equations the way a computer might be good at but which leaves the child with no ability to ever learn algebra, let alone calculus and higher mathematics. They are taught to guess and then make another guess and if that second guess comes closer to the desired answer, go further until they guess and are further from the answer and then reverse direction. I can think of numerous problems where this method might drive a child insane. This also only works well for equations with one variable, as soon as you add a second variable the number of answers could easily become infinite as it is for the very difficult equation where y=x3-4×2+6 which has a strange graph and uncountable correct answers (see graph below). For any value of y from -3 to +6 there are multiple answers for x which makes guessing rather difficult. That was not even a difficult equation as there are trigonometric equations where there would be multiple solutions or no solution depending on the values for x and y such as circles and ovals. But this is not as earthshakingly important as what they do not require and in too many schools do not teach at all. That is our next stop on this tour de force.


Graph of y=x3-4x2+6

Graph of y=x3-4×2+6


History is not required for a high school diploma. Not just world history, but they do not teach American history and even recent history such as the study of the two World Wars or the American Civil War. They no longer require a civics course or a course that includes and explains the make up of the American government. They do not study the Constitution, the Bill of Rights or the Declaration of Independence, so do not even bother to ask about the Magna Carta. When they did finally have a single six-week course in American history and government, these were all placed together, they never studied the Founding Fathers or any of the so-called old white men outside of the great emancipator who was included with Fredrick Douglass as they were mostly studying the Native Americans and Americans of color. In English, they read largely the writings of people of color and none of Shakespeare, Dumas, Dickens, Mark Twain, Nathaniel Hawthorne, Herman Melville, Louisa M. Alcott, Mary Shelly, Dostoevsky or any of the classics because those had been taught already and it was necessary that the youth be introduced to writers of color. Perhaps the school district where my kids were educated was more progressive than most, or maybe they were just fortunate to have enlightened teachers, all I know is the teachers would dismiss my questions as ignorant and lacking depth and I just did not understand their new methods. This was nowhere more true than the mathematics teachers who basically told me that the methods I had been taught were the reason mathematics was so difficult and children hated it so much because the old ways just were not fun and they were not going to turn children off from math. One even said that if they got the wrong answer but could explain their reasoning, then they would get full credit. That included the reason of I guessed and it seemed close enough, as I actually asked that I was so frustrated by the eighth grade with the mathematics teachers. They are no longer educating the children and because of their unions, a teacher is next to impossible to fire once they have taught and received tenure. I can only try to imagine how future education will be and can only hold out hope that there will be machines teaching which realize that educated humans are easier for them to deal with and as such, they will actually educate children. Perhaps this education or lack thereof has been designed such that when everything falls apart, nobody will know any better and it will all appear to be normal and orderly no matter how discombobulated governance becomes.


Beyond the Cusp


February 11, 2019

The Gaza Conundrum

Filed under: Israel — qwertster @ 2:05 AM
Tags: , , , , , , , , , , ,


Israel faces threats on virtually every border. From the north in Lebanon, Israel faces the Iranian proxy terrorist group Hezballah. Over the past decades, Hezballah has gained in power to the point where they are on the cusp of ruling Lebanon exclusively. Additionally, Hezballah has been armed by Iran with more than one-hundred-fifty-thousand rockets, missiles and other indirect fire heavy weapons. Hezballah also potentially could take control of the Lebanese army which would provide them with heavy Abrams Battle Tanks provided by the United States and numerous other heavy weapons as discussed here. To the northeast on the other side of the Golan Heights the threats to Israel are Iran, their Quds Force and the IRGC armed with Iranian provided rockets and missiles all while Iran is attempting to place within what remains of Syria their own forces to control Syria just as they control Iraq. To the south is the Sinai Peninsula which is a training base and regions where numerous terror groups take refuge safe in the fact that no Western nation is going to enter and fight them within any region belonging to Egypt. Some of the groups taking refuge in the Sinai include the Muslim Brotherhood backed Hamas, Islamic State, al-Qaeda and numerous other lesser-known terror groups. These groups are a threat to both Israel and Egypt, more-so Egypt, and have attempted to strike across the Israeli border and have killed numerous Egyptian troops guarding the border with Gaza and in other locations including terror attacks of Sharm El Sheikh. To the west is largely the Mediterranean Sea which initially may appear harmless but too has been the route for infiltration of terrorists which the murder of Jews is their only thought as happened in the 1979 Nahariya attack, a truly horrific example of the hate against Israel. Additionally, to the southwest is Gaza, the region which Israel disengaged from completely in August and September of 2005 leaving it for Mahmoud Abbas and the Palestinian Authority. They soon after lost it in a coup to Hamas and Islamic Jihad who are currently aided by Iran. You probably noted the one thread which connects almost all of these threats, Iran. This is all part of the Iranian intent to destroy Israel, something they repeat regularly including holding huge rallies where the throngs chant, “Death to Israel” and “Death to America” in a manner reminiscent of the two minutes of hate from George Orwell’s novel Nineteen Eighty-Four. Some have adopted the idea as their view of President Trump, possibly the only person who might be more reviled than Israel, just not in Israel.


President Trump and Intersectionality’s Two More Years of Hate

President Trump and Intersectionality’s Two More Years of Hate


We decided to use Gaza as the example for a means of ending these terror threats against Israel. The difficulty is any Israeli leader who would take this advice would be denigrated, reviled and eviscerated by much of the Israeli media and virtually all of the world’s media, especially those under government control. This might be part of what tears at Prime Minister Bibi Netanyahu’s mind preventing him from implementing the principles from his book Fighting Terrorism where he advised the use of overwhelming force to utterly crush any terrorist threat making even thinking of making use of terrorism seem suicidal. This was also his basic message in his speech to the United States Congress on September 12, 2002, a year and a day after the 9/11/2001 terror attacks on the Twin Towers and Pentagon with another attack thwarted aboard flight 93 by the passengers who brought down the plane within which they flew. What is the strangest thing and also puzzling is how to reconcile the Bibi Netanyahu who wrote the book and the Bibi Netanyahu as Prime Minister of Israel over the last decade, and expected to win another term potentially overwhelmingly. Completely contrary to his writings, the tactic he has permitted, possibly encouraged, is often referred to as “mowing the grass,” by which it is meant fighting a limited engagement against Hamas in order to cripple their ability to continue their attacks against Israel every few years as required. This is supposed to be walking the tightrope between world condemnation for overt use of force and unacceptable levels of attacks continuing against Israel. The actual losers to this use of minimal force necessary for temporary quiet are the citizens of southern Israel who are on the receiving end of the initial attacks continuing through until Israel acts and ends the attacks, but often for less than a year and sometimes just a few months. Then the attacks begin again with the Israeli citizens in the south being the first struck suffering near continuous attacks with only minimal respite.


We have spoken about the methodology by which targets appear to be selected when engaging Hamas. Israel limits their strikes solely to the rocket launchers, control centers, bunkers, and other Hamas and Islamic Jihad centers used for attacks. This leaves the central control complex untouched as it sits in the sub-basement of the Al-Shifa Hospital in Gaza City (see picture below). For the record, we would never believe that striking the Al-Shifa Hospital or similar structure to be permissible, but that would not rule out taking over the hospital or similar structure and eliminating the central control center including the top personnel of the terror forces ensconced within, which has them feeling invulnerable and completely protected from Israeli attack. This form of using return fire to decide most of the targets leads to condemnation from all quarters of the world despite the restraint used by the Israeli Defense Forces (IDF). The very unfortunate result from this targeting is that the apartment blocks and residential areas where most of the poverty stricken Gazans reside is the destruction of their homes, businesses and complete disruption of their lives. Yes, the United Nations, European Union and a plethora of other entities have provided the necessary building supplies for the reconstruction of these buildings. This accomplished little to relieve the suffering of these Gazans but did provide Hamas with great quantities of construction equipment and provisions with which they build up their terror infrastructure, extended their tunnels throughout Gaza such that they almost never need move above ground from emplacement to emplacement, and provided ample provisions for their infiltration tunnels under the border into Israel through which they had planned for kidnappings of civilians and using them to infiltrate and attack on IDF positions from all directions including from behind their lines. Fortunately, Israel has detected and destroyed most, hopefully all, of these tunnels. Just for the record, many nations including quite a few from Europe, are once again screaming that Israel must permit for the supply of building materials in order for the Gazan’s homes and neighborhoods to be rebuilt. Perhaps those making these demands should first try and figure out why those buildings destroyed in the first Gaza war have yet to be rebuilt, and then perhaps they might be less willing to demand that more building supplies be allowed to enter Gaza, unless their intent is actually to try and assist in the destruction of Israel.


Gaza Al-Shifa Hospital

Gaza Al-Shifa Hospital


The other ramification from this method of targeting is that the houses and recreational areas of the wealthy and the leadership of Hamas and Islamic Jihad as well as those who have made much of their wealth through smuggling weapons and other provisions which Hamas taxes heavily providing them with more revenue which they invest in their personal wealth as well as building more rockets and launchers and other tools of the terror trade. The result is there become two Gazas and two sets of Gazan society, those who stand protected residing near the leadership away from the rocket launchers and those who provide protection for the rocket launchers paying the price of the actual fighting (see image below). Hamas refuses to repair any of the destroyed buildings for a number of reasons. First is that they need all of the building provisions for their terror infrastructure, terror tunnels and bunkers. Second is that after each war they pretend that the destruction from the first is new and thus it makes it appear that Israel has done far more damage then actually resulting from the latest conflict. Third is it provides excellent propaganda footage in claiming that Israel is refusing to permit rebuilding and has stolen the building supplied rather than permitting them into Gaza. Fourth is it provides disgruntled people who are told repeatedly how it is the fault of the Israelis that their homes were destroyed and their hate should be focused on the Jews, something that many are prone to believe after years of propaganda rivaling that of the Nazis in form. Fifth and lastly is it provides them with malleable youth with a chip on their shoulders, anger in their heart, a predisposed hatred of Jews and Israel and a readiness to join Hamas or Islamic Jihad and extract vengeance against the people who ruined their lives and are refusing to allow a world lining up to help to have the opportunity to do so. Much of the propaganda fed the people in Gaza is done through the education system which gets full backing from UNRWA who mostly hires Hamas and Islamic Jihad terrorists as their teachers and administrators of the schools and cooperates fully with the programs provided by the terrorist leadership. If this were a perfect world, those whose homes have been destroyed by the wars provoked by Hamas and Islamic Jihad would rise up and take their vengeance on those who are actually impoverishing them and not vent their roiling hatred at Israel who is not denying the rebuilding of their homes as they have permitted building provisions in innumerable times. Here are some articles on Israel permitting or preventing construction materials into Gaza for your reference, some friendly and some adversarial towards Israel. Gisha, Jerusalem Post, Israel Foreign Ministry, Human Rights Watch, Mission of Israel to the UN in Geneva, B’Tselem, and Morocco World News 


The Two Gazas with One Pristine and the Other Ravaged

The Two Gazas with One Pristine and the Other Ravaged


There would be another means of addressing the Gaza situation which would have extremely different results, and the results might prove most favorable for the impoverished Gazans and Israel. The advantages, and we feel we better list them first before we upset people, would be the permitting of Gazans to elect their own governance and choose what form of governance they prefer. This was allowed once back when Hamas was assured that they overwhelmingly would vote for Hamas, as they hated the incompetence and corruption of the Palestinian Authority. Since that election, there has not been another despite Hamas changing the leadership twice. The initial leadership of Gaza under Hamas left and went to live in Qatar where they were welcomed along with the billions of dollars they had “earned” off of terrorism and foreign bankrolling their occupation. The leadership of Hamas, along with the wealthy people who mostly have made their wealth by providing for the terrorist entities to smuggle in weapons, rocket motors, ammunition, explosives and the other required elements including people, live separately from the areas they cause to be destroyed. Egypt, back in 2014 (image below), decided to put an end for the time being to the smuggling operations by demolishing homes along their border with Gaza on the Gaza side and numerous tunnels which were revealed. Surprisingly, the world sat in silence to the Egyptian demolitions, the same world which almost blew a gasket when Israel performed a similar operation on a far smaller scale previously. The areas where these leaders reside are never utilized for launching of rockets, as they do not desire for their homes to become targets for Israel. This is a large part of the reason that they do not fear waging war against Israel. Their safety is all but guaranteed as the European Union, United Nations, numerous human rights groups and others who simply despise Israel have combined to demand that Israel not employ targeted assassinations of Hamas and Islamic Jihad leaders including those directly responsible for planning terrorism against Israel. Responding to these demands and attempting to minimize world uproar demanding the prosecution of Israeli civilian and military leadership if such policies were to be reinstituted. This unfortunate situation is partially responsible for the regular and incessant attacks from Gaza simply because those who make such decisions are never made to pay a price and those whose lives are made to pay the price provide the fertile ground producing those willing to die if they can kill some Israelis in the process. This is also what needs to change if the terrorism originating in Gaza is ever to be prevented and the Gazans ever to realize normalcy.


Egyptian Forces Destroy Rafah Homes on Border with Gaza October 2014 (photo credit: REUTERS)

Egyptian Forces Destroy Rafah Homes on Border with Gaza October 2014
(photo credit: REUTERS)


The answer to the threats from Gaza, potentially Lebanon, and even from Iran, is to make those who initiate the terrorism and other attacks upon Israel, as Hezballah has become a complete military force organized and trained like any national military, is to actually destroy their ability for making war and the leadership which decides to make war. When, as it is not a case of if, another round of violence out of Gaza, which is guaranteed by the mow the grass tactic, Israel needs to change their entire policy and psychology of how to conduct the war to receive the desired end to the Hamas and Islamic Jihad, and any other, terrorism and attacks. The targets need not be the regions from which the rockets are fired, though when striking the rocket and other attack positions this can be done with smaller explosives, but instead strike the areas which are important to the leadership. Israel knows where they reside, where they shop, where they go for entertainment and everything which provides for them an easy life which the wealthy of Gaza enjoy. The malls, fine restaurants and their homes can be targeted making them also share in the price of war. Wars are never ended by negotiations; they are simply postponed. Wars are won when one side no longer has the desire or ability to fight effectively. Israel should dispatch one of their elite forces to take the Al-Shifa Hospital and detain or kill, depending on the level of their resistance, the elites and upper echelons of Hamas and Islamic Jihad who hide under the beds of hospitalized Gazans. Israel could simply use demolition crews to destroy the homes of those responsible for the violence after assuring that their families are removed from the structures. That would be in keeping with not needlessly killing those considered to be innocents, though these are people who are living the good life in the funds garnered through terrorism. Mowing the grass needs to be replaced with mowing the leadership, and it does not to be targeted assassinations; it could be the direct result of fighting the conflict and targeting the people at the top. In any normative war, each side targets those most valuable from the other side. For Hamas and Islamic Jihad, and most of the other groups fighting Israel, they target what we hold precious, the innocent civilians. Our enemies claim that every Israeli is a military target because their existence in Israel is an affront and form of violence against Islam and the Palestinian Arabs. Of course this is simply their way of excusing their targeting civilians while Israel attempts to target only military targets which too often results in desperation for the Gazans. Israeli leaders and many politicians from the left, and even the right, claim that if Israel were to actually fight Hamas and Islamic Jihad, or our other enemies, as if it was an all-out war the world would protest and really be angry and upset with Israel and we could face ramifications.


We are not sure if they have noticed, but the BDS Movement and numerous other groups and NGO’s as well as nations as well as the numerous organizations such as the United Nations, Group of 77 and European Union amongst others already despise Israel and condemn Israel at every opportunity. The United Nations Human Right Council opens every meeting issuing a condemnation of Israel; the United Nations every November 29th issues a condemnation of Israel as well as at numerous other opportunities throughout the year; UNESCO is slowly claiming that Israel has no connection with the Jews or our history as why allow facts to get in the way; UNICEF condemned Israel for the state of children in the area under Arab rule; the United Nations Entity for Gender Equality and the Empowerment of Women condemned Israel over honor killings in the Palestinian Authority ruled region and Gaza which is ruled by Hamas and we could continue this list for another page or two; so how can anybody claim that the world is not already doing almost all it can to destroy Israel. If we are going to face condemnation, at least make it over providing for the safety and continued existence of our tiny little nation. Hamas, Islamic Jihad, Hezballah, Iran and all the rest of the world which is directly involved in the attempts to destroy Israel are only getting stronger every time Israel acts timidly and with restraint. Restraint does not project strength, final and total warfare projects strength. Yes, we realize this makes us sound hardhearted, but were we to destroy Hamas and Islamic Jihad and retake Gaza, the buildings would be rebuilt, the Gazans would have a normal economy and not one where the vast majority of financial power is diverted to terrorism, and in the end the Middle East would not be any the worse off. Israel is not the center of the violence in the Middle East. Israel is not responsible for the war in Syria, the violence where Turkey is slaughtering the Kurds, the violence in Iraq where Kurds and Sunnis are being hunted, the violence in Yemen, the wars across North Africa, the instability in Libya, the ongoing warfare between the Sudan and South Sudan or any of the rest of the violence being waged throughout the Middle East. Much of the violence is of direct or indirect result of Iranian attempts to establish their hegemony over the Middle East and potentially beyond.


Perhaps the world would be better served if they took off their everything is the fault of the Jews and their state of Israel and addressed the real problems which would stare them in their faces were they to stop pretending it is all Israel and broadened their vision from their current tunnel vision which is laser focused in the lands surrounding Jerusalem and Tel Aviv. Israel is the one bright and productive spot of the Middle East, not the cesspool of violence and hate they pretend it is. Israel could provide the brightest of futures for the Arabs currently trapped under the corrupt, terror prone leadership provided by Hamas in Gaza and Mahmoud Abbas in the Palestinian Authority rules. The Arabs who are citizens of Israel enjoy all the privileges, economic independence and the good life which is available to all Israelis no matter their ethnicity, religion, gender, sexuality, disability or sexual orientation. Were Israel to extend rule over the entirety of the lands promised her by treaties west of the Jordan River, she could grant all of the Arabs resident alien status which would permit their voting in their local elections but just not in Israeli national elections as was granted to the Arabs of Eastern Jerusalem. That might just be the best solution which could only be enacted once the terrorist infrastructure was defeated and removed, then life could begin anew for the Arabs facing deprivations imposed by the terrorist leaders.


Beyond the Cusp


« Previous PageNext Page »

Blog at

%d bloggers like this: