Beyond the Cusp

April 27, 2017

Losing Free Speech Would be a Costly Mistake

 

Free speech as protected in the First Amendment does not protect “Hate Speech,” or so says Howard Dean. This is kind of funny as my remembrances were that unpopular speech was exactly the speech the First Amendment was meant to protect, and “Hate Speech” would most certainly be very unpopular. The proof of this is exactly what is playing out at University of California, Berkley Campus, often referred to as the home of free speech. It was at Berkeley in the 1960’s that freedom of speech was first tested and protected with the anti-war movement. It was back during this tumultuous time when the five rights delineated in the words of the First Amendment: ”Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances. Seems simply stated though courts have recognized that certain logical limits should be applied to “Freedom of speech” such as yelling fire in a crowded theater when there is no fire as such could lead to bodily harm. Causing bodily harm was an important limitation to most rights; you could continue any right up to the point of harming another soul. As distressing as it might be to hear honest and actual “Hate Speech,” it has been a right defended time and again as this is exactly the speech which is protected which is largely behind the reason that the ACLU defends the rights of the American Nazi Party to march and speak in public in the famous Skokie Case which occurred in Ohio.

 

Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes formulated the clear and present danger test for free speech cases. In that case, Socialist Party of America official Charles Schenck had been convicted under the Espionage Act for publishing leaflets urging resistance to the draft. Schenck appealed, arguing that the Espionage Act violated the Free Speech Clause of the First Amendment. In Schenck v. United States, the Supreme Court unanimously rejected Schenck’s appeal and affirmed his conviction. This conviction continued to be debated over whether Schenck went against the right to freedom of speech protected by the First Amendment. Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr., writing for the Court, explained, “the question in every case is whether the words used are used in such circumstances and are of such a nature as to create a clear and present danger that they will bring about the substantive evils that Congress has a right to prevent.”* Included in these evils would be bodily harm to individuals or a group of individuals. This is real and measurable harm, not like some other qualifiers in our society where it comes down to the desired opinion of the individual in question.

 

The problem with Howard Dean goes further than denying protections of the First Amendment to “Hate Speech” in his definitions. Mr. Dean defines “Hate Speech” in this case as the upcoming scheduled speech by conservative journalist Ann Coulter. We at BTC do not agree with Miss Coulter on any number of her positions but defend her right to speak to the group which invited her and anyone else who desires to hear her speak. But, Howard Dean desires that a committee of like-minded people such as himself be appointed to decide what constitutes “Hate Speech” and thus ban that which they disapprove. Should such be permitted, then how long before we are facing 1984 and Big Brother Watching for INGSOC (English Socialism) and its trinity of newspeak; “War is Peace,” “Freedom is Slavery” and “Ignorance is Strength.” These were considered “double-plus-good” and deviating and becoming emotional was considered you’re becoming a threat which is very much “double-plus-ungood.” This was presumably the Achilles Heel of INGSOC and the loose thread that if pulled hard enough, everything would unravel. Mr. Dean believes that the little snowflakes attending University of California Berkeley cannot handle reality given at face value. It is the leftist indoctrination and the permitting of the college indoctrination keeping these snowflakes, otherwise called students, from ideas which their professors would consider to be outside their own message and thus as “Hate Speech.” This would be when the professors inform the easily influenced snowflakes that they can escape Ms. Coulter and her viscous “Hate Speech” by running to their designated safe zone. This begs the question of what are they afraid of?

 

Ann Coulter

Ann Coulter

 

Therein lies the secret. One could ask the professors exactly what is it that they and Howard Dean are so afraid the children in their care might hear, dissenting opinions and arguments backed up with convincing facts and references to refute the lies they have been foisting on impressionable minds such that they can indoctrinate them and fashion them into fellow leftists. This education format is dangerous as it instills a singular outlook on the world which lacks the fullness of depth and only allows for understanding the leftist outlook. This leaves these students unprepared for the real world and the demands it will throw their way. Unfortunately, many of these delicate flowers find themselves a job in the middle of a flower patch full of fellow flower power advocates and never leave their comfort zone. Others will often need to lose a few jobs before they start to realize that there is an entire world out there just waiting for them to study and learn of other opinions which permeate the workplace. They will find that there really are men and women with diverse ideas and concepts which their college indoctrination did not prepare them for and unless they begin to receive such as potentially valid and weigh everything testing the concepts against the real world finding new ideas which work as well or better than what they had learned, they will live a life restricted and void of the ability for comparative reason. Once they are freed to become whomever they eventually define themselves as being, their lives will grow from that point. What is so pathetic is that in all too many instances, especially in the soft sciences, the outlook in such a college atmosphere is limited to singular leftist opinions integrated so as to replace any normative lesson with one based on a strictly limited leftist outlook. With “Trigger Warnings” and “Micro-Aggressions” (whatever in the world these are) demanded to be placed on any material which might shake up their world, the snowflakes are restricted to living life in their leftist cocoon. Many of these students tend to be hard sciences-challenged as they cannot accept that there are such items as correct and incorrect results. They have been taught that it is the effort that matters and not the correct answer. These sensitive and fragile egos cannot handle having to produce actual results as reaching the correct value in an answer has become more subjective in this new world being foisted upon all too many college students. What is remarkable is today’s speech police demanding the banning of all speech which contradicts or questions any of the leftist ideologies, were the very people demanding open and free speech be upheld when their speech was the undesirable ideas. When their ideas were the ones challenging the status-quo, the demand was to honor the spirit of the first amendment and permit all speech. Now that theirs is the established speech and the former status-quo has become the challenging speech, these former guardians of the freedoms of the First Amendment become stuffy old fuddy-duddy holders of the line, they now demand that only “Approved Speech” which will not hurt their little future indoctrinated leftist army by forcing them to think. You need understand one principle of this new age, groupthink must be maintained and all speech which counters groupthink must be banned and kept from ever reaching the ears of their subjects. That is the truth; they are no longer students in these institutes of higher indoctrination but are merely subjects there to be programmed and sent out in an as-is condition and most companies are required to retrain college graduates on how to perform their jobs. Remedial training at many technical companies includes simple algebra and geometry problems, as such skills were never taught effectively from kindergarten on through college. Other subjects no longer taught in anything resembling a rational or reasoned manner and especially not the traditional manner are such little items as history including, American history, Ancient History, Modern History, Civics, English, and any of the Humanities. Many classes now avoid inclusion of any men, especially white men and never any white men who had slaves. This makes the coverage of the founding of America rather different from traditional teaching of the subject. English no longer believes that any of the traditional white male authors or their compatriots such as Mary Shelley as she committed the crime of co-writing with men of her era. Other authors considered too Christian or traditional include William Shakespeare, Chaucer, Oscar Wilde, Edgar Allen Poe, J.R.R. Tolkien, Brothers Grimm, Alexandre Dumas, Aesop or even the story of Beowulf as it is too simplistic depicting good and evil and degrades women as Grendel’s mother is shown as evil despite her only crime presumably was being a woman, or so the argument is made. There are hundreds of authors, composers and masters of the arts who are now considered unworthy simply because they expound on the ideals of good and evil and the Judeo-Christian, white male perspective even if they may have been women as it is the good and evil ethics of Judeo-Christianity they cannot couch. When your belief system is that all things are in all ways equal you have no belief system, you have a cop-out refusing to experimentally compare and contrast one set of ideas against another and judge which one is more erudite, more morally correct, and honors humankind treating all equal (or as equal as such treatment was due people in the period in which one lived as it is completely unfair to judge a person from 1776 or from 1492 or from 92 or before that sometime BCE such as around 1050 BCE, approximately when King David conquered Yerushalayim and made it the Capital City of Israel from that time forward through time).

 

The willingness of the professors of the colleges and universities to deign whether anything or anyone is worthy of attention solely if they measure up to the standards of the modern secular humanist leftist version of quality is Stalinesque. Their idea of equality is no better than Charlemagne had a handle on it as the Inquisition followed him across the continent of Europe and felled many an innocent, thus is the reality when one utilizes an arbitrary system in deciding whether one is worthy of life or consideration. Students today are not even required to read philosophers such as Descartes, Kant, Machiavelli, Sun Tzu, Tolstoy, Dostoyevsky, Homer, Jules Verne, Ernest Hemingway, Bram Stoker, Isaac Asimov, Carl von Clausewitz or others. Instead, many classes only read often solely from obscure poets and writers from Africa and Asia with recent additions in many schools of Quranic based education in the public schools, apparently there is no separation of Mosque and State as there is Temple, Church, Synagogue and state, respectively. The classics in writing, music and art are considered now to be poisonous to student sensitivity. They are simply taught that their entire heritage, providing their heritage came from a Judeo-Christian basis, is to be destroyed and discarded as retaining any piece of Judeo-Christian ethics is a thought crime for which one will face ridicule and be ostracized. All that our modern society is built upon is taught to be contaminated and rotting through and through and the sooner we allow refugees from across the third world, the place of variety and where there are beautiful ideals to be explored and exalted as they are completely foreign to Western thought and custom and thus they must be superiorly equal, the sooner our societies can grow under new influences which will be simply wonderful, or so it is promised. I never thought that this phrase could ever actually fit in an article about modern society, but it can be said that as all civilizations and all philosophies are claimed to be equal but Judeo-Christianity and Eurocentric histories are to be considered to be of a lesser nature and to be cast down because some civilizations, some philosophies, some religious writings, some traditions are simply more equal than others and these are the ones which have nothing to do with Western culture and the developed world’s actual roots. The university campus is a self-hating reactionary place where normative thought is considered gauche and to be rejected with everything to do with Judeo-Christian history and development as that is the wrong path for the future. Really?

 

Beyond the Cusp

 

* Our thanks to WikiPedia for the previous examples from the life of Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr.

 

March 20, 2017

Why President Trump Cannot Win

 

Before we start the actual article, we would like to mention and give our respect and condolences to all who are feeling the loss of Chuck Berry. The man was a Rock-n-Roll icon to four generations and his concerts later in his life while he was in his 70’s would draw everything from teenagers to silver haired ladies and all would rock right along as one. The man was also an example of how one should live their lives. His life was dedicated to his music, his fans, married to the same woman his entire life, did not abuse drugs, did not drink and was a man who attended church and truly lived a well-mannered life. We wish to respect his life and mourn a world which has lost a truly great man.

 

 

President Trump has all the power and can do anything he desires. This is the fear mongering we read in the newspapers all too often and hear from the leftists in full panic attack as they no longer control the White House. After eight years of a Progressive Democrat following eight years of a Progressive Republican which followed eight more years of a Progressive Democrat the left and the Progressive right are in a panic. They really should calm themselves as President Donald Trump is a fellow Progressive in many ways even if those he has appointed to some very important posts are not such. Look at those posts and one should be glad that he has put unemotional purists in the slots dealing with national security, the military, counter terrorism, homeland security, intelligence position and such which protect America and the free world. Thus far the most counter progressive appointment he made has been Judge Neil Gorsuch to the Supreme Court and his main offense has been refusing to make law by interpreting the law to meet supposed modern sensitivities and instead simply applying the law. This has put Senator Schumer’s panties in a bunch and sent him screaming into the halls of the Senate rallying the troops. But we can expect this for every nominee which President Trump puts forth for position on any bench and perhaps people should remind Senator Schumer that it was President Obama who appointed Judge Neil Gorsuch to his current position. But Senator Schumer is far from the main opposition President Trump is facing.

 

President Trump is facing a hostile media which currently he is enjoying the threat and has turned much of the confrontation to his benefit, but that cannot last. The media enjoys strong allies placed throughout the nation in the form of entertainment media, their secret weapon. As television, music, movie and other entertainment venues slowly chip and pick at the position of the President and make jokes about his every miscue these things pile up and with time begin to affect the thinking of many Americans. Slowly they will ebb away at his support and make him appear buffoonish and even stupid and uneducated which will erode faith in his ability to make wise choices. As such, they will have him at a disadvantage within a couple of years and may make his reelection all but impossible. President Trump very likely will not even seek reelection as if there is a strong sense of doubt that he could win no matter who the Democrats put forth or that the Republicans themselves may try to unseat him in the primaries, he may decide that with such disregard for his efforts, why bother. But even all of this is not his greatest opposition.

 

President Trump’s greatest opposition is the government itself. While we have been asleep since about 1965 the government has grown to the point where the elected politicians do not even make the laws any longer, that has been relegated to the unelected bureaucrats. When the House of Representatives or the Senate write a piece of legislation it defines the end results they wish to see. This gets tossed around and watered down until it really means absolutely nothing at all, it just has some feel good phrases and soundbites which can be used in their reelection campaigns and some high-minded and altruistic goal in the title and otherwise is an empty shell. The only exceptions are military budgets and tax legislation where they say exactly what the lobbyists and the Generals desire most. These other empty titles are passed off with the same phrase that the Secretary of one of the many Cabinet positions used so their assistants and their assistants and on and on to fill in the legislation with the regulations necessary to accommodate the desired meaning of the bill. Now these Cabinet Secretaries are not about to spend their time weaving these bills into operative and meaningful actions as they are mostly there to oversee that things get accomplished. To that end they will slide this off on some high ranking bureaucrat responsible and presumably knowledgeable to flush everything out who passes this off to some of their underlings on down until it reaches somebody who has nobody else to pass it to or until someone feels like this is their ticket to the top and the regulations are written and the wheels of government continue to grind, the people they presumably serve, into dust. New rules are issued and eventually someone runs afoul of one of these regulations which most never knew existed but somebody inevitably gets caught in the wheels of the legislative and regulatory nightmare.

 

Any hope that President Trump believes he has for changing government will get lost somewhere deep inside the legislative machinery which now employs almost one in fourteen Americans (the number is higher if you count only working Americans, it more than doubles to 16.7 percent of the U.S. workforce). The government workers union, American Federation of Government Employees (AFGE), was actually heavily invested in the reelection campaign for President Obama though they did so outside of the view of the media. The government, especially the Federal Government, is filled with people who are ardent Democrat supporters and are fully indoctrinated in liberal ideology. This has been further enforced through selective hiring and as the most dangerous time in a government worker’s career are the first few years, the years when they can be fired or removed through a reduction in force (RIF) directive where the department head is to remove people with the most recent hire first and in reverse order with an exception that if they can find a nonessential position where two people are performing a similar job for which only one is necessary, then the more junior person can be let go. This second means is another means whereby an identified conservative will be fired despite the many protections government workers enjoy. There is another way such an employee can keep their position but that requires approvals and other means whereby they push a person with less time in government out in their place and many are reluctant and prefer just finding a real job, as they would phrase it. These are the people who started the idea that it takes three government workers to do a single job equivalent to the same job in the real world. Is it true? Who knows, no such study has or ever will be permitted to be performed. Having resided in Washington D.C. and having been married to an employee of our Federal Government, I refuse to answer because the government has such long arms and is run by just such persons. Changing or removing some of, if not most, of these people is near impossible as this video explains to some extent.

 

 

 

Percentage of American Population Working for Government by Year

Percentage of American Population Working for Government by Year

 

The problem is not entirely in the government though that is where President Trump will find the greatest resistance and the perversion of everything he believes he has achieved unless he can persuade the Congress to actually write the entirety of the law and not leave it to the government machine to define the rules. Did I mention that this will never happen? The problem actually starts far earlier than with the government. It starts with the education system and from the earliest grades. We hear about the rare teacher who spouts out their political feelings and denounces President Trump, President Bush or whatever politician, usually a Republican. Do such denunciations ever target a Democrat? Great question and an example would be greatly appreciated. The reality is that many parents do not ask their children what happened or what they learned in school and when they do the child often shrugs or says, “Nothin’ much” and it gets dropped at that. If their child did grace them with an example, it would likely be the one thing they did learn and remember learning, but much of learning is more subtle, closer to subliminal. It is the subliminal education which often is the most permanent and where indoctrination does its damage. The textbooks are often written by academics that also have a left leaning slant and outside of the hard sciences there is much room for the soft indoctrination from the left in their education and through their societal influences. This is what has led to the “safe spaces” and the disinviting of conservative speakers or the outrageous actions such as the recent events at Middlebury College or University of California Berkley where students basically rioted and at one location severely injured one of the professors who was assigned to moderate the talk. These actions and the rioting in many cities where law enforcement was instructed to back off and give the rioters both in the cities and colleges the room required for them to express their outrage was an outrage in itself. Is this to be the face of the new world where hooligans are permitted freedom to destroy property and injure those with whom they feel have no right to any contrary opinion, or even who are accused of having a contrary opinion? If this is the way of the society in the West, then we can be assured that the West is going to fall. This is uncivil behavior and no civilization can survive when incivility becomes an acceptable means of expression. Such permissiveness and a government which with continued growth could reach an unsupportable size are reasons that Europe is failing and could become a critical problem for the United States as well.

 

There is one last item which could also cause the end of Western civilization, its inability to defend itself. The United States is still the world’s greatest super power, but that is not guaranteed for the future. It was not all that long ago when Great Britain was the great power and before them France and even Spain and they all proved, as if Rome had not done so before them, all super powers finally fall. Going back even further there were Greece, Persia, Babylon, Egypt, Hittites, China, India and even Siam. Having great power is not a guarantee of continued power. That requires dedications, vigilance and the desire to continue to bear the costs of such preeminence. Such costs continue to rise as weapon systems grow ever more complex and research takes greater scientific knowledge which brings us back to education, in this case the hard sciences, an area of endeavor which remains the most challenging and the less inclined rarely venture into these waters. Without an expressed importance placed on such study, it falls by the wayside as does military power which is not properly stressed and thus funded. The problem comes when a society gains so large a cost of social spending, particularly welfare spending and retirement promises where recipients don’t or no longer replace revenues into the system, exceeds the limitations of taxes and other revenues that the military becomes an expense no longer afforded. This is a prospect which the guaranteed minimum wage, especially as a livable wage, makes an even more dire situation and brings the choice as a sooner onset rather than a later one. There is a development which if technology continues at its current rate of increase will make these two situations collide and force a complete revamping of revenue enhancing streams as otherwise the governments will financially collapse. Eventually these advancements will make work more of a hobby which select groups will dedicate themselves towards while the majority of the population will do as they see fit and be permitted such by the advances of technology. That, perhaps, should be a future article leaving us to conclude on that sweet note.

 

Beyond the Cusp

 

March 2, 2017

Muslim Threats Surge Causing Reactionary Backlash

 

Violence in Europe has been steadily rising while media coverage has been consistently retreating in direct proportion. As the violence becomes ever more difficult to avoid the media shields its eyes and ears refusing to notice anything. Making matters worse has been should anybody make statements revealing the rising dangers the media immediately defends their intentional ignorance of the violence and condemns the person for noticing what is right in front of them. The media is on this trail of see no violence, hear no violence and never ever speak about the violence to the point that the political parties who are drawing attentions to the violence and claiming they will fight the rising violence and stem its root cause are derided and ridiculed while the media continues to gush flowingly over the leftist leaders in power who are doing as little as they can get away with while leaving the doors open to allowing even higher and continuing rising levels of violence. During this article we will include pictures which will tell a story in addition to and possibly complimenting the world as we go. Why not start now.

 


Sweden Burning During President Obamas Administration
Stockholm Riots and Violence Enter Fourth Day

Much of the problem has arrived along with the refugees. This is where the problem begins, how to relieve the refugee situations in a humanitarian manner while safeguarding the public and the European way of life. There are Islamists who are utilizing the refugee situation and the goodwill of the European Judeo-Christian ethics which demands that when we see people suffering and in desperate need of help that we open our arms and doors and accept the challenge to assist these people. But are we required to sacrifice our own wellbeing in doing so? There the answer need be no, and not just no, but no in a very big way. If amongst the refugees there is a core group who are refusing to be thankful for the help we are granting their countrymen and fellow Muslims and instead are threatening our civility and our civilization, then perhaps we need to find a means of weeding out the troublesome ones from the real refugees. Where the left will claim that this would be making the true refugees suffer more hardship, the question must be what hardship will they face were Europe to also collapse and the very Islamists that are currently fleeing take charge in Europe, then where would they be? They would be right back where they started; living in a failed nation with Islamists murdering everybody they believe is not sufficiently subservient to their demands and not following their ideas of Sharia closely enough. When faced with Islamists who refuse to adapt to the European basics for the society and the ways and means of the society and instead are demanding that Europe adjust to their social structure, then there is an impasse which must be addressed and addressed immediately. People carry signs as in the picture below are a threat to the very structure and future of the European society.

 

Signs Demanding Submission to Islam Which is Exactly the Meaning of Islam Submission

Signs Demanding Submission to Islam
Which is Exactly the Meaning of Islam Submission

 

The other side is not exactly the sweet smell of flowers in the morning. There is sufficient hatred and violence from both sides. The one difference is one side is defending Europe and their homes and way of life while the other is threatening conquest and subjugating the native population of Europe. Further, this is not like the first time that Europeans have faced an Islamic invasion. The first was turned back by Charles “the Hammer” Martel in the Battle of Tours in 733, and then twice at the gates of Vienna in 1529 and 1683 where the Ottomans were turned back by the Holy Roman Empire with the second battle being won by Polish King John III Sobieski. This battle for Europe is being fought not by an outright invasion as much as by subversion through massive infiltration. The idea is to impose Sharia on Europe and the United States which by the United States they include Canada as if it were the fifty-first state. The entire idea and layout of the process is presented in the following video titled “Sharia Law: The Silent Take Over of Europe And America – Immigration Crisis 2016.”

 

 

Let us continue. The problem as we view it is that there is an idea that using the emergency whereby there is an influx of refugees into Europe and the United States, until recently and that is still in the courts, that Islamist interests and influences can be placed within these nations and then they can be toppled one-by-one or en-masse through subversion. This was one of the means used by Islam with great success through much of Northern and continuing into Central Africa. They would slowly infiltrate and the first Muslims would preach inclusion, religious freedoms, equal rights and all the ideas and ideals held dear by the existing populations. These concepts could easily be backed with quotations from the Quran from the parts written in the early period which was while Muhammad resided in Mecca and was receiving presumably the verses from the Angel Gabriel who spoke to him while he meditated in a cave outside Mecca. Then, once the Islamic population reaches a certain strength, often around one-fourth of the population, then they would begin to riot and cause distress finally overthrowing the government promising to relieve the people from the horrific conditions of the rioting and other violence. Once in power they enact Sharia and the people can either convert to Islam or live in a state of submission to their Islamic betters, some might call them overlords. There would be laws and taxes imposed on the non-Muslims, the tax is called the Jizya (Arabic: جزية‎‎), which would be increased should additional funds be required to fight a war or to quell any revolts. The non-Muslims would end up paying for their own subjugation.

 

At the point where the game-plan changed and the Muslims took charge, they would then be operating using the Quranic verses written in Medina. While in Medina Muhammad was no longer meditating in the cave nor speaking with the angel Gabriel, he was the commander of a caravan raiding army. These raiders attacked the trade caravans which were headed for the port and trading center in Mecca where riches such as silk and other Asian treasures were traded for the goods from the Middle East and the remains of the Roman Empire as well as the Byzantine Empire which though weakened still ruled from the Greek Isles past Egypt and into Arabia and the Middle East. Muhammad also declared war on the three major Jewish tribes residing in the area. Two were sent into exile after their defeat, but the last was handled differently and many believe this was the start of Muhammad’s period of conquest. This last tribe, the Banu Qurayza (Arabic: بنو قريظة‎‎, Hebrew: בני קוריט’ה‎‎) had all the surviving men of fighting age to the most elderly lined up and beheaded while the children were raised as Muslims and the women were either used as concubines if they were found attractive and the rest were utlized as breeding stock and kept pregnant until they died. For a short article describing the two stages of the Quran and some additional background we have an article titled “Which Quran, Mecca or Medina?” This time apparently the Islamists smell weakness as they are jumping straight to attempting to overthrow the entirety of Europe by swarm and not through slow build-up of their numbers before resorting to violence.

 

Example of Islamist Violence in Europe

Example of Islamist Violence in Europe

 

So, what might be a solution to the current situation? One direction which could be taken would be to reduce the demand upon Europe and the developed world for taking the extreme numbers of Islamic refugees. Has anybody noticed the absolute dearth of refugees taken in by Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, Oman, United Arab Emirates, Bahrain, Iran, Iraq and the rest of the Muslim world? Perhaps the time has come to demand they take part in addressing this situation and take in some of the refugees alleviating Europe and the United States et al of taking on the brunt of the refugees. The non-Islamic world has taken in their share of refugees from the current situation and perhaps it is time for some of their brothers and sisters, their co-religionists to take their share of the burden. It is not exactly as if Saudi Arabia is cash starved or short of room, especially when compared to Europe. When even Israel has agreed to take in one-hundred Syrian orphans, is it too much to have the richest of the Islamic world to do their part? They should be ashamed that they are doing less than the Israelis are offering to take care of. Additionally, Israel has been treating Syrian casualties with no questions asked. They are brought across the Golan Heights border with each faction having their own designated drop-off point and once the patient can be mobilized and need only minimal additional treatment they are returned to the same drop-point where their faction assumes their care. This may include fighters or civilians as Israel does not want to know nor is Israel told, the Israelis simply are performing humanitarian aid healing those in need of their help and as there are limited hospital facilities left standing and operative, Israel is often the only place to turn. Israel is not advertising nor are they denying this assistance and cannot respond as to who or whether those they treat were injured in the fighting or simply because and are not involved. The one thing that is known is that it has cost the Israeli government many hundreds of millions if not even tens of billions of dollars and nobody has offered to assist defray these costs. Sometimes when doing the right and humane thing one finds themselves very alone in this world, something Israel has become very aware of and continues to be humane no matter the costs.

 


Israel Quietly Treats Wounded Syrians from Al Jazeera English al-jazeera

 

Europe is where this problem has manifested its most serious challenges. The numbers of rapes has risen and is directly traceable to the influx of, as they are referred to by the authorities, “Asians” and the extent of the rise has been kept as if it were a state secret, which perhaps it is. The rioting now has also grown a backlash with anti-refugee demonstrations and the more violent anti-Islam riots. The governments have had no problem labelling these as a xenophobic tragedy of epic proportions. Their claim is that these demonstrations are downright unchristian. It can only be seen as absurd that these leftist politicians who have done everything in their power to destroy Christianity throughout Europe now coat themselves in the cloak of Christianity and take a holier than thou stance on the refugee situation. Still, for the large part the blowback against the refugee situation is more of a reaction to the violence and the Islamists and not the Muslims entirely. The problem is that the truly needy refugees are caught up in the same dragnet which is thrown to catch the Islamist violence situation and they get swept into the same category by association. These Islamists are hurting their own fellow followers of the Prophet Muhammad by their violence in the name of the Prophet. This has tainted all Muslims and further all Arabs even to include the Christians who are now attacked and thrust out by both sides of the issue and yet somehow the leftist politicians make it unanimous as they too fail to grant the Arab Christians the proper protection they require and leave them subject to the violence from all sides. That may be the greatest sadness of the entire situation. Still, if the European governments do not get people elected in their coming elections in the next four years across the continent and a proper set of conditions and controls put in place, then European governments will indeed fall and the violence coming to the streets will be of tidal proportions. Below is a picture of one of the demonstrations against allowing further refugee immigration from the many across all of Europe.

 

Anti Refugee Demonstration

Anti Refugee Demonstration

 

The remainder is where the Islamists will take their fight to spread Islam over the entire world, as they claim they are directed to do by the Quran and the teachings of the Prophet Muhammad. Many Islamists view Europe as already won and well on its way to becoming the new heart of the coming Caliphate. They are less concerned now with forming a Caliphate centered in the nations of the Middle East where there are entrenched Muslim leaders many vying to lead any future Islamic empire and making Europe their new center where the Islamist forces who believe they are getting beyond the cusp in their conquest of Europe and installing themselves as the new rulers in the European continent which they can begin their new Caliphate. They are so assured of their European victory and taking rule over all of Europe making it one great Islamic power replete with a large nuclear arsenal and a ready military that they are declaring their great conquest next on the “to do” list, the United States. Just such a reminder is evidenced in the image below.

 

The End Target of the Violence, America It Will Come for You Too Given Time

The End Target of the Violence, America
It Will Come for You Too Given Time

 

If you did not finish the longish video above, or even if you have, listen as it tells the plan word for word and believe that they are sure that Sharia is coming to cover the entire world and it will do so in their lifetimes. Believe this as much as they believe it or there will be no preventing such from becoming our reality and in the all too soon eventuality.

 

Beyond the Cusp

 

Next Page »

Create a free website or blog at WordPress.com.