Arab Summit Lays Traps for Trump and Israel

 

The 29th Arab Summit which adjourned April 15, 2018, has been panned by many as having provided President Trump with a great opportunity to finalize and end the Arab-Israeli conflict. Their resolution which was the main subject on their final days all but ignored the conflicts in Syria, Iraq, Yemen, Libya, Bahrain and Sudan, giving them scant attention. Their statement released gave full attention to the Palestinian situation declaring, “We reaffirm that the Palestine Cause is the entire Arab nation’s main priority, stressing the Arab identity of occupied East Al-Quds as the capital of the State of Palestine.” Their mention of East al-Quds is a restatement of the Arab laying claim to eastern quarter of Jerusalem which includes the Old City and the Temple Mount with all the holy sites of three religions. One small item which bears great weight on their claim is the way Jordan refused to permit Jews at all times and Christians and other non-Muslims access to any of the holy areas of the Old City including the Temple Mount and the desecrations which caused the grave markers of the Mount of Olives cemetery to be strewn and broken utilized as paving stones and to construct bathrooms. This was the Jordanian idea of full and equal access for all religions which has only been realized since 1967 after Israel liberated their occupied territories from Jordan who had illegally held these areas since the 1948 war to eradicate the Jewish State which failed but still managed to steal away lands belonging to the Jewish State under the San Remo Conference and the treaties which followed. Should the world desire that the Temple Mount remain accessible to all, then the Arab Summit trap must be sidestepped and the Arabs denied their supersessionist demands. Their statement put their demands succinctly and in full claiming, “The conflict could be ended through a two-state solution that guarantees the establishment of an independent Palestinian state on the borders of July 4, 1967, with East Al-Quds as its capital.” The demand that the borders be set as they were on the day before the Arab attacks started the Six Day War where Israel liberated her formerly Arab occupied lands as well as the Sinai Peninsula, the region returned to Egypt in exchange for peace. The Arab Summit is demanded a complete reset of the situation which brought on the Arab assault to destroy Israel on July 5, 1967, something which completely ignores all previous treaties and agreements which all allowed Israel to retain lands such that Israel have a defendable border. The borders of July 4, 1967, would not allow for Israel to be defendable as it would leave Tel Aviv in direct range of the Judean Hills and a mere nine miles from Arab forces standing on the high ground overlooking most of Israeli infrastructure.

 

Let us look first at the United Nations Security Council and their suggested solution laid out in United Nations Security Council Resolution 242, the carefully worded plan for the basis in resolving the Arab-Israeli conflict. The clause which has caused the most bafflement and confusion within the debates states, “Withdrawal of Israeli armed forces from territories occupied in the recent conflict;” which was debated to great extent with Hugh Mackintosh Foot, Baron Caradon taking the center stage in the debate on the wording of the resolution. Allow us to quote from this in depth article explaining Lord Caradon’s reasoning and purpose for his wording, “Much play has been made of the fact that we didn’t say “the” territories or “all the” territories. But that was deliberate. I myself knew very well the 1967 boundaries and if we had put in the “the” or “all the” that could only have meant that we wished to see the 1967 boundaries perpetuated in the form of a permanent frontier. This I was certainly not prepared to recommend.” Lord Caradon was specific that Israel was not to be forced to return to the same borders present on July 4, 1967, which was a major cause of the Six Day War. Many believe that the real intent of UNSC Res 242 was to have Israel return parts of the Sinai Peninsula, possibly allowing the Israel border to follow along the central mountain spine of the Sinai Peninsula and to have the Jordan River as the Israeli eastern border. Needless to point out, the Arabs have always stated this resolution claiming it actually states either, “the territories” or worse, “all the territories” while refusing to recognize the actual wording of simply “territories” allowing for the Israeli borders to be altered providing Israel with the additional territory to provide her defensible borders with the strategic depth required to do so. At a minimum, the vast majority of military strategists agree that for Israel to have the strategic depth and a defensible border, Israel should necessarily continue to hold the lands east of the Jordan River, the high grounds overlooking the Jordan Valley as well as the high grounds overlooking central Israel from the Judean Heights (see the cutaway showing the tactical necessities). President Trump had best familiarize himself with the tedious and specific arguments and deliberations which contributed to the formalized final draft of UNSC Res 242 before finalizing any presentation of his Deal of the Century so that he avoids falling into the Arab Summit laid trap.

 

Cutaway View of Tactical Advantage and Necessity
of the Jordan Valley and Judean Hills for Defending
Coastal Plains and Israel Alongside the Mediterranean Sea

 

The Arab Summit has produced the only solution the Arabs, including the Palestinian Authority, have ever claimed will work and even then they make that conditional. They make a point to stress that they “affirm the illegality of the American decision to recognize Jerusalem as the capital of Israel,” as such a recognition also makes a recognition of the existence of the State of Israel, something the Arab World still rejects and refuses to recognize. They further emphasize this with their declaration, “we categorically refuse to recognize Jerusalem (Al-Quds) as the capital of Israel, where East Al-Quds will remain the capital State of Palestine. We warn against taking any action that would change the current legal and political status of Al-Quds.” The Arab Summit did not miss the opportunity to blame Israel for the entirety of the situation claiming, “will end the political stalemate resulting from the intransigence of Israeli positions.” The most dangerous of the Arab Summit statements was their unwillingness to positively end the unstableness of the area and the conflict the Arabs insist on continuing against Israel until they succeed in destroying the Jewish State. This was made evident in their posturing with, “The conflict could be ended through a two-state solution that guarantees the establishment of an independent Palestinian state on the borders of 4 July 1967 with East Al-Quds as its capital.”

 

Allow us to now get a tad upset with the entirety of the Arab Summit declarations over three words, “could be ended,” and not would be ended or shall be ended or anything to indicate finality of the agreement in cementing a complete and total end to the Arab-Jewish Conflict, and make no pretense, that is the reality of the conflict. The Arab Summit insists on continuing their denial of the right of the Jews to self-determination. The sad part is that most of Europe also does not recognize the right of the Jews to self-determination. According to Islam, the driving force behind the lives of the Arab World, the Jews are forever Dhimmi, second-class citizens with limited rights, needing to be cared for by their betters, the believers of Islam. In Europe, this was initially driven by the Church which believed they had replaced the Jews as the Chosen People and the Jews being rejected by Hashem were now considered as followers of the devil and accursed. This belief has carried on through the Reformation to the numerous Protestant forms of Christianity and has been accepted by secularist in Europe, as it has become second nature to both Europe and the Islamic World of the MENA* states. Both Christianity and Islam have a problem with the existence of Israel in that should the Jews return to their ancient homeland and prove the prophesy that the Jewish People would be gathered again to Eretz Yisroel, then the idea that Christianity replaced Judaism and that Islam replaced both in both cases because the formers had a better and more final version of the Word of Hashem, then this becomes challenged as the original Word of Hashem of Judaism becomes reestablished. This makes Israel a threat to both faiths with an interesting exception of Christianity which has embraced the return of the Jews to their ancient homelands as one of the precursors for the coming of the Messiah. In Christianity, that return is the “Second Coming” while in Judaism it is the initial coming of the Messiah.

 

This problem that the Arab Summit nations refuse to accept the existence of Israel and use the phrase, “could be ended,” instead of accepting any agreement as a final and acceptable end to hostility, such as terrorism, warfare, rocket attacks or Iranian nuclear attack, they leave open the intent and near certainty that all of these aggressions are to be continued. That is not peace by any definition; they are simply demanding a reset of the borders to the most advantageous set of borders for their attempts to erase Israel. This is not an offer of peace but a guarantee of ever-continuing warfare and violence in all of its numerous variations. The only peace which can be had would be to find a means of having the Palestinian Arabs in the Shomron to be returned their Jordanian citizenship and their being given enticements to move to Jordan or find a new homeland which will accept them and the granting of citizenship to the refugees by the nation where they reside as their camps are more like neighborhoods with apartments and stores surrounded by barbed wire. If the refugees were also permitted to choose where they are to reside, all of them outside of Israel being the only stipulation, even given some enticement which would likely cost less than one year’s funding of UNRWA** and the aid sent to the Palestinian Authority. This would have the advantage of finality ending this seventy-year plus struggle, but the Arabs will not accept any finality in which Israel remains and Jews have self-determination. This is, unfortunately, the position taken by many nations in the world whenever there is a vote in the United Nations. In reality, Israel is far more accepted when it comes to international relations as Israel has embassies in over one-hundred-fifty nations. Israel is a healthy nation with a thriving and growing economy and has given the world many wonderful discoveries as well as being amongst, if not the, first nation to arrive after there has been a disaster, natural or otherwise, anywhere in the world when permitted by the government, providing aid, search and rescue and often a field hospital which has functional departments for virtually any service a full sized hospital offers. Israel is a member nation in the United Nations despite being deprived of normalcy due to the Arab World and the European nations both of which do whatever they are able to prevent Israel sitting on the Security Council or to be a member, let alone chair, and of the numerous United Nations agencies. It is because of these irrational acts of belligerence against Israel often exemplified by the actions of the United Nations Agencies such as the Human Rights Commission, UNESCO, UNICEF and especially the General Assembly that Israel should fear the world accepting the phrasing, “could be ended,” as actually meaning an end to the violence and an actual peace treaty. Israel is being served by the Arab Summit a guarantee of continued violence with intent to destroy the Jewish State depriving Jews of self-determination and depriving them of life and only allowing the Jews of Israel the peace of the grave, not a peace of arms. Of course, Arab selectivity of decisions, declarations, resolutions and even wording where the words must be as they perceive them and not as they were approved, comes to the fore with their rejection of President Trump, including his recognition of Jerusalem as the Capital City of Israel, and their complete acceptance of President Obama and especially his claims that Jerusalem was actual al-Quds and that Israel must return to the July 4, 1967 lines; yet it is Israeli rejectionism that is the problem and Arab rejection of Israel is absolutely natural and completely understandable and utterly defensible, thus whatever the Arab Summit decides must be accepted as completely fair and just why Israel must be rejected as an abomination. Please excuse us if we refuse to accept Arab rejectionism concerning Israel and their demands that Jews accept their Dhimmi status.

 

Beyond the Cusp

 

*MENA = Middle East and North Africa

**UNRWA = United Nations Relief and Works Agency

 

Trump Said Go Slow, not Stop Altogether

 

Let us start with a direct Trump quote on the whole building in Judea and Samaria, particularly in Area C which rightfully all but belongs to Israel according to the Oslo Accords. President Trump stated, “I would like you to hold back on settlements for a little bit.” This was reported back on February 15 2017, and included the advice to “wait for a deal” and since that statement there have been some earth-shaking developments which have revealed truths putting any hope for a deal completely torn to shreds. But for the sake of clarity, let us review what has gone down since Netanyahu had that, which was for me, upsetting little discourse before the White House press corps and the world. So, let us begin.

 

There was the wonderful virtual stomach-wrenching adoration affair soon after with President Trump speaking of promises and other great and wonderful results which were to come from his meeting with Mahmoud Abbas. Then there was the statement by Abbas where he blatantly lied stating, “Mr. President, I affirm to you that we are raising our youth, our children, our grandchildren on a culture of peace.” Abbas claimed “And we are endeavoring to bring about security, freedom and peace for our children to live like the other children in the world, along with the Israeli children in peace, freedom and security.” Netanyahu’s reactions came upon President Trump’s visit to our region after his historic meetings in Saudi Arabia. He took the opportunity to show President Trump evidence, which revealed the lie completely and compellingly, likely using video materials similar to those we have included below, with each starting with Mahmoud Abbas lying to the President of the United States’ face. (In these videos, there are some mistranslations as they report them as saying Zionists when the word heard is “Yahud” which translates to “Jew”). Reports came after his meeting with President Trump and presenting him with information his own advisors should have had the duty to inform him about. The fact that it took Netanyahu to show President Trump the truth that put to lie his statement affirming that they “are raising our youth, our children, our grandchildren on a culture of peace,” is frightening as it shows that President Trump’s advisors are clueless on the entire truth of the conflict involving Israel and the Arab world. This was proven further when even after being schooled on Abbas lying; President Trump left his Bethlehem meeting with Abbas accepting his promise that they would no longer pay terrorists salaries.

 

 

Subsequent to his return to Washington D.C. Secretary of State Tillerman told the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, “They have changed that policy, and their intent is to cease the payments to the families of those who have committed murder or violence against others. We have been very clear with them that this is simply not acceptable to us.” This was reported on 20 Sivan 5777 or June 14, 2017. I make this date so important because this was in the morning of that date, and then everybody had lunch, and then there was the afternoon. Then, Secretary of State Rex Tillerson before the House Foreign Affairs Committee stated that the State Department had “changed their policy” on accepting that Abbas and the Palestinian Authority had certainly ceased payments to terrorists in Israeli prisons and families of terrorists and that the United States is in the middle of an “active discussion” with Ramallah on the issue. So during one day in hearing Secretary of State Tillerman had gone through a metamorphosis from telling that assurances were “given to me during the President’s visit to Bethlehem.” He then went on to further claim that he had certain “window of patience” on the matter but that if it takes too long he “will become disinterested.”

 

The entire obvious confusion and double-talking by the Secretary of State could be cleared for all if they would simply understand the report from the Palestinian Authority Prisoners’ Affairs Commissioner Essa Qaraka who said in a statement this week that payments to convicted terrorists and their families, and those of “martyrs” (terrorists killed while attacking Israelis) will certainly continue, because “almost every other household among the Palestinian people is the family of a prisoner or martyr.” So, their claim is that terrorism is so wide-spread and pervasive in the Palestinian population that virtually if not every family is receiving stipends tied to their relative ability to have murdered Israelis. Some families, it has been proudly reported, are receiving multiple stipends as more than one member had murdered Israelis in terror attacks and that the economy of the Palestinian Authority is based on murdering Israelis and that the majority of the monies provided by the United States, Europe, the United Nations and the entire world go to educating the children to murder Israelis, preferably Jews, and the remainder goes to stipends as payment for such murders with the remainder going into the pockets of Abbas and his cronies.

 

Now, I am sure there are those confused by Secretary Tillerman and other confused somewhat about the Palestinian Authority and what they intend truly to do. Let us start with the Palestinian Authority, as that is the easier of the two. The Palestinian Authority is a terrorist organization despite claims that it is an elected body. It is the elected body which resembles very closely the elected leadership of the PLO, a terror group, and the Fatah leadership, whose party chairman is Abbas. Abbas heads the PLO and is the president of the Palestinian Authority. Mahmoud Abbas also is the President of Palestine which technically replaced the Palestinian Authority which was disbanded by Abbas on January 3, 2013. On that date, the Palestinian Authority from the office of President Mahmoud Abbas issuing the following Decree:

“Official documents, seals, signs and letterheads of the Palestinian National Authority official and national institutions shall be amended by replacing the name ‘Palestinian National Authority’ whenever it appears by the name ‘State of Palestine’ and by adopting the emblem of the State of Palestine.”

 

The frightening thing is this idea of the existence of the State of Palestine has been accepted by 131 of the 193 United Nations Member States who supported the recent General Assembly vote recognizing the Palestinian Authority to be a member of the United Nations as the State of Palestine. The vote forced a vote in the Security Council on whether or not Palestine would be admitted to the United Nations. The Security Council vote was lobbied by the United States and subsequently failed thus it did not require the United States to use their Veto. That did not change the recognition granted by the General Assembly. The United Nations still allows the State of Palestine to sit as an observer nation under the title State of Palestine (see images below). Since then, in conflict with the charters of the individual agencies and that of the United Nations, many of the individual agencies have recognized and admitted the State of Palestine to their membership roles. The first to do so was UNESCO who has, since then, passed one resolution after another declaring initially that the Temple Mount has no connection to Judaism. They then extended this claiming that the Western Wall also is purely Islamic just as is the Temple Mount and everything upon the Temple Mount including the Church of the Holy Sepulchre are Islamic (see video below). UNICEF has also seen fit to recognize and list information about the State of Palestine including a map and statistics. What is not mentioned is the majority of the clean water is provided by Israel, as is the electricity. Most of the children in Judea and Samaria also, when needed, are given free medical care in Israeli hospitals. All of what is provided by Israel to the Arabs under Abbas and his organizations and upon which they are dependent are never paid for by their leadership thus their costs end up passed on to Israeli customers, just one more inequity which is never considered to be worthy of making the news. Other United Nations also have given recognition for the existence of the State of Palestine which might get one to wondering why there are still debates and negotiations with the Palestinian Authority which no longer exists and for the reason of establishing the State of Palestine which obviously does exist according to much of the world. Why not just set their borders as Area A and Area B and leave Area C for Israel as the Oslo Accords had relegated the dispensation of the lands and allow everything to go from there.

 

State of Palestine seats at the United Nations General Assembly

 

 

The final end should be that Abbas should be made to make his claim to the lands which he believes belongs to the State of Palestine and Israel should simply declare what areas under dispute Israel claims. Should there be any difference, which there will be, guaranteed, then a mediator should be appointed, or preferably a group of mediators and simply pound out as compromise. If there cannot be any compromise reached, then let the two then agree that a state of war exists between Israel and the State of Palestine and let things be settled by the old-fashioned means. We could predict what Abbas will claim are the borders for his State of Palestine. They would be the Jordan River, the Mediterranean Sea, the Lebanese border and the Egyptian border. His claim would include Gaza, Judea, Samaria and all of Israel because his desire is not for a State of Palestine as much as it is for the destruction of Israel. It matters not what borders Israel would claim because any land claimed by Israel would be denied by the Arabs as they refuse to permit a Jewish State with any borders, not a single square millimeter. Abbas proved this when the claim that all of Israel was a sacred Waqf of the Arab people, the Palestinians. This means very simply that the violence and terrorism war cannot end as long as any Jew resides on the land which is all of Israel. That is the end in simply language, and Hamas will demand the war continue until every Jew is dead. The reality is simply that the war is against the Jews and once the Jews are gone the war will then continue against the Christians as it has been fighting currently throughout the Islamic Arab world where the Jews were already driven from the lands and this war then continues until the final war which either Islam conquers the entire world or the world completely destroys Islam, there will not be any other settlement unless the Muslims drastically redefine their religion, so why not build in our land as whether we build or do not build, the end will still only come by the same means, the Muslims learning to live with Israel and the rest of the world or we will lose and all be destroyed. We will then know without a doubt which is stronger, Hashem or Allah. That is what will need to be decided once and for all, and the two are not the same and only one can be the true Creator of the Universe.

 

Beyond the Cusp

 

European Surrender Signs Stronger

 

It should not be surprising that one of the glimmers of life comes from Britain simply due to their BREXIT vote but the real test there will be the next elections. Should Britain swerve leftward and elect Labor to lead the coalition and choose the next Prime Minister, then we can fully expect a new referendum asking whether or not BREXIT should be followed through or abandoned and have Britain return to the loving and safe arms of the European Union (EU). That will be the message carried throughout much of the British media and many of their media darlings will come out supporting a return to normalcy and the EU. Returning to the EU will be the new normal and the previous BREXIT vote will be caricatured as a one-off temporary insanity where people lost their heads and abandoned all reason. We at BTC pray that such a referendum would go down in glorious flames as the people who were even in doubt fearing an end to the British Isles would soon follow any affirmation of BREXIT policy would now realize that the world does not end if one leaves the Brussels bureaucracy and allow a reaffirmation of BREXIT to win overwhelming support. Even better would be the reelection of the Conservatives and retaining the leadership of Prime Minister Theresa May and follow through on BREXIT to the very end. Britain could, as a result, once again rise to be the leader of all Europe. The question would then arise as to who would desire to be next to join the club of independence and liberty?

 

France. What can be said when they had the opportunity to defend their nation and take control grabbing the steering wheel and turning ever so bluntly toward nationalism. But no, they shied away and ran back to the comfortable do nothing and hope for the best while guaranteeing the worst. France is not alone as the Netherlands also had a choice and more than usual voted to protect their national heritage. But the Dutch elections still left Geert Wilders and his Party for Freedom (PVV) falling short and once again being denied a place in the ruling coalition. What is it about Europe that when given the opportunity to actually stand up and defend their lives and the freedoms they have come to enjoy, they simply close their eyes and believe that doing nothing will be sufficient, as it has worked thus far. Have the Dutch completely forgotten the story about the little boy who plugged the hole in the dyke with his finger waiting for somebody to come and repair the hole? Perhaps they are the ones who passed by and patted the youth on the head and pleaded that he continue his good work counting on his stamina and ability to stand in that spot forever. That does not work any better than it would, had the youth not received assistance before getting too tired to continue plugging the hole. The Dutch decided the lad needs no assistance and just continuing as they have in the past which created their emergency situation will somehow address the problems without their having to actually change their attitudes and actually seek different solutions to the bromides which make one feel great listening to how multiculturalism will broaden their views and bring a whole new set of horizons into their lives.

 

This statement is true but it misses the most important point, many of the new arrivals do not desire widened horizons, they do not even care about the horizon one single bit, they care about Sharia and its implementation and the obedience of all around them. They demand complete and unadulterated surrender to Allah by everyone, just as Geert Wilders has predicted and continuously warned. But why listen to somebody the media tells you is a right wing fascist when he is warning about the importing of radical Islamic totalitarian radicals who will impose something far worse than Geert Wilders as Prime Minister. The warnings he expounds about Imams dictating your lives, wearing specific approved Islamic style clothing, praying to Allah prostrated towards Mecca or facing execution by some of the most brutal methods imaginable, these could come true should any in Europe continue on their current path. The signs are everywhere and nobody is paying even the slightest bit of attention because they are all too busy chasing their next hedonistic pleasure and then the one after that in such a rush to make themselves thrilled and exuberant forgetting that there are things one is expected to do. Believe it or not, but with all the copulations which are being performed across Europe there is a complete dearth of children. Strollers being pushed along with two more children walking along with mother once was a typical sight throughout Europe, especially in Italy or so Giulio Meotti has reported. Look as you are out strolling the boulevards today when you are out, count the numbers of strollers or even the numbers of children, and then ask yourself, where did the children disappear? We can tell you.

 

You have filled your lives with things which though titillating and scintillating thrilling your brain with serotonin and endorphins making for your greatest pleasures but have missed out on the most natural means of satisfaction, giving meaning to everything in your life, having and raising children. Living for the moment and for only your own pleasure is a life wasted. Living and bringing up children is a true means of reward and satisfaction when they accomplish and do well. When they make trouble, which is a sign that there is something you have missed which they require and this allows for introspection and an assessment of how you are living and what example are you providing. Children are a form of mirror in which you see your actions reflected in their lives and this often will give you better life counseling than that thousand dollar per hour psychiatrist you visit twice weekly and get nothing but a prescription for drugs your brain is lacking for. Children will give your brain all it needs and often quite a lot more. They also provide a future for your society because without children, you are inviting invasion by foreign peoples whose ideas will become the majority ideas and the basis for the future of your nation.

 

Another recent signal that all is close to lost in Europe was a vote taken in UNESCO (United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization) removing any historic identity of the Jewish People with Jerusalem labeling Israel as being “the occupying power” in her own Capital City. While Sweden, under orders directly from Stockholm, was the sole EU nation openly voting in favor of the resolution, the remainder of the EU nations abstained with the proud exception of Italy allowing the Islamist block to pretend they represent the world simply because the EU nations refused to pick a side. A vote with more abstentions than all Yay and Nay votes combined allowing such a travesty speaks to the loss of identity and their loss of faith in anything. We have mentioned the source for European strength through the ages. Despite the troubles, which came from the misuse of the Judeo-Christian ethic by dictatorial monarchs and land barons, for gain of wealth or lands, a definitive misuse of the Judeo-Christian ethic, there were good results which largely came as a result of the Reformation making the Renaissance possible followed by the scientific gains and the industrial revolution. The entirety of the developed world came as a result of the core morality taught by the basics of Judeo-Christian ideologies and the eventual revolution, which separated government from religion allowing for freedom of religion, which led to all other freedoms enjoyed by the developed world. The abstentions by the EU nations, and Britain and Ireland, are simply another symptom of the loss of purpose beyond self-aggrandizement and the pure pursuit of pleasure over responsibility. To have taken a side, and the Judeo-Christian roots of Europe would point to support of Israel, not the sacrifice of Israel and the Jews, would have displayed at least some spine and value system. But Europe is forsaking everything it once believed and found worth fighting for and if this baselessness stemming from the lack of belief in anything, it will lead to a forced belief in a foreign system being imposed by a minority which believes in something strongly enough to kill and die for. This is what will eventually take over Europe should Europe continue to believe only in the self and that which pleases each individual being sought by individuals who care only for their individual pleasures and individuality. This does not make for a healthy society not one that can long survive on its own as there is no cohesiveness and thus no central spine or unifying belief.

 

There was another event where a secret ballot was taken to place Saudi Arabia onto the United Nations Commission on Women’s Rights (UNCWR). As it was a secret ballot, there are only a few things that are known. Foremost, we know that a majority affirmed the appointment. Further, Belgium Prime Minister Charles Michel gave an explanation for their affirmative vote of which the Brussels’ delegation was explicitly asked to vote in favor of the Saudi Arabia and to even let the Saudis know of their intentions where he appeared to apologize for the leak more than he was for the affirmation of Saudi Arabia. As reported in an article by Giulio Meotti “Belgian Foreign Minister Didier Reynder said the delegation sought to “inform the various candidates, including Saudi Arabia” about its support, despite the vote being secret.” Mr. Meotti further reports, ““Sweden has voted for the Saudis, 90% sure,” said Hillel Neuer, director of UN Watch, while Wikileaks has offered $10,000 to anyone who would reveal the Stockholm vote.” We wish we could assist Wikileaks on this one, as the reward would pay for one very fun weekend, or week. So now Saudi Arabia will sit and assist in deciding concerns brought before the UNCWR. We can soon expect the UNCWR to pass a referendum declaring that Israel is responsible for the horrific state of women’s rights in Gaza and the Palestinian Authority (PA) areas where such practices as wife beating, honor killings, spousal rapes, forced child marriages and other related abuses are abundant. The UNCWR will soon become just another United Nations agency endeavoring to release as many papers and studies on the evils of being Israel, the lone Jewish State and ancestral home for the Jewish People joining the likes of the UNHRC, UNESCO, UNICEF and numerous others.

 

Back to Europe and the EU. The EU actually is another institution, which often appears to be overly concerned with the purported evils of being Israel, as it often appears that the main crime of the Jewish State is the fact it exists. Meanwhile, while the EU is so concerned over the problems with Israel it ignores the problems facing Europe herself. The door was flung open to presumed “refugees” from Syria and the floodgates allowed heaven knows who to enter Europe, the only obvious item was that well over three-fourths of these “refugees” were unaccompanied males between the ages of sixteen and forty-nine. Since the entrance of these “refugees” the numbers of sex related crimes in the nations where the majority of these “refugees” relocated have tripled or even worse. The main nations facing these increases are Sweden, Germany, Belgium, France and others. One of the more interesting statistics comes when one observes the map of terrorist strikes across Europe, the Middle East and Northern Africa and one will notice a near total absence of attacks in Poland, Romania, Lithuania, Estonia and Latvia correlates to a far lower number of refugee asylum seekers in those same nations. On the other side of the scale, Germany and France have had the greatest problems and also are amongst, Germany actual being, the leaders in asylum seekers. One also need include the number of “refugees” which have entered and disappeared rather than seeking asylum instead opting to disappear falling between the cracks during the highest refugee phases flooding into mostly Germany, France and Sweden as these nations offered the greatest benefits and easiest entrance, especially Germany where Chancellor Angela Merkel announced her nation’s expectation to take up to 800,000 Syrian refugees and she opened the borders wide and immediately the country was inundated with refugees, and once again these refugees were largely males between the ages of 16 and 49. The correlations are evident in the two maps below.

 

Maps of Europe Top Terror Attacks Bottom Immigrant Assylum Seekers

 

Europe has lost its way and Islam has eyed Europe as their target to conquer Christianity. Where Europe may have given up on Christianity, nobody informed the Muslims of this fact and still view Europe as a Christian continent which must be conquered and transformed into a Muslim continent. The conquest will be done through immigration and Europe will find themselves in a war for the hearts and minds of the average European. Will Europe awaken and realize that which is occurring or will they sleep until it is too late and they face conversion to Islam or at best a quick and relatively painless death. On the other hand they may face a war fought brutally and the idea of offering Islam through force and conquest where those whose region has fallen to the insurrectionist Muslims will face an easy choice of converting immediately or falling to the sword or worse, face Inquisition style coercion as an influence to convert where there really is no choice. European thinking for a moment that they can accept Islam but continue to live their lives as they currently are living chasing after pleasures and a social life and other hedonistic pleasures will find that when adopting Islam the entire area changes and those things so many Europeans are accustom will simply be closed and permanently disappear. No more bars, dance halls, drug coffee houses, movie theaters, homosexual bath houses, theaters or many of the things which make spring in Paris or throughout the year in Amsterdam unrecognizable. Life will lose all its “fun” and be replaced with prayers five times every day and memorizing the Quran. Schools would no longer teach math or chemistry or language other than Arabic and the only schoolbook will be the Quran and the Hadiths. Religious police will walk the streets assuring that everybody is dressed appropriately and often there will be stop and ask one to repeat a quote from the Quran and punishment for lack of knowledge is severe, immediate and final. This is the end result if Europe does not awaken and realize that perhaps the ways of the past might be worth preserving otherwise the current social norms will soon be forcefully cancelled. That will be permanently cancelled and that future many would see as dark, very dark without any light signaling there is an end to that tunnel.

 

Beyond the Cusp