Beyond the Cusp

May 24, 2015

President Obama Nuclear Free World Duplicity Starts with Israel

Filed under: Administration,Advanced Weapions Systems,Aliyah,Amalekites,Anti-Israel,Anti-Semitism,Anti-Zionist,Appease Islamic Interests,Appeasement,Arab Appeasement,Arab League,Arab World,Ayatollah Khamenei,Binding Resolution,Biological Weapons,Blood Libel,Boko Haram,Borders,Boycott,Breakout Point,Cabinet,Chemical Weapons,China,Chosen People,Civilization,Commandments,Condemning Israel,Conflict Avoidnce,Covenant,Coverup,Crusades,Czarist Russia,Ditherer in Chief,Domestic NGOs,Egypt,EMP Device,Europe,European Council,European Governments,European Historic Anti Semitism,European Pressure,European Union,Executive Order,Forced Solution,Foreign Funding,Foreign NGOs,Government,Green Line,Hamas,Hate,Hezballah,History,Holocaust,IAF,IDF,Inquisition,International Politics,Intifada,Intifada,Iran,Iranian Military,Iranian Pressure,Iraq,Iraqi Military,IRGC,ISIS,Islam,Islamic Pressure,Israel,Israeli Capital City,Israeli Interests,Jerusalem,Jewish Home,Jewish State,Jews,Jordan,Jordan River,Jordanian Pressure,Leftist Pressures,Light unto the Nations,Mediterranean Sea,Murder Israelis,Muslim Expansionism,Muslim World,Nazi,Nuclear Proliferation,Nuclear Weapons,Nuclear Weapons,Obama,Oppression,P5+1,Palestinian Pressures,Passover,Plutonium Production,Pogroms,Politicized Findings,Politics,President Obama,Promised Land,Promised Land,Resolution,Response to Muslim Takeover,Response to Terrorism,Rock Throwing,Rocket Attacks,Russian Pressure,Saudi Arabian Pressure,Secular Interests,Seder,Sharia,Sharia Law,Submission,Supreme Leader,Syria,Terror,Threat to Israel,Torah,Union Interests,United Nations Presures,United States Pressure,Uranium Enrichment,Weapons of Mass Destruction,WMD,World Opinion,World Pressures,Zionism,Zionist — qwertster @ 2:07 AM
Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

 

To be completely honest, President Obama would have started his quest for a nuclear free world by destroying the nuclear weapons of the United States followed by those of the rest of NATO and immediately thereafter the Israeli nuclear weapons once it was actually established they exist and then and only then he might have requested that Russia and China please follow his bold initiative. Fortunately for the free world, and even the less free world, President Obama was not allowed to follow through with his bold plan of destroying all of the United States nuclear weapons followed soon by the rest of the nuclear weapons from the free world and then hoped the less than free world would kindly follow suit, after all, what could possibly go wrong with such a brilliant and inspired plan. Certainly Russian President Vlad (the Invader) Putin would have leapt at such an opportunity to be rid of his nuclear weapons as would have the Chinese leadership, destroying them over as many American targets as their generals could identify as required for the easy invasion and takeover of the United States and her allies. We would like to advise the Generals and others responsible for the United States nuclear arsenal to check the storage bunkers and nuclear weapons deployed on your boomer subs and elsewhere to assure that they are still containing their warheads and not some equivalent item purchased at Toys R Us which look realistic, well, as realistic as plastic made in China toys would look like. The same advice goes for any NATO or other nation who allowed anybody from the Obama administration anywhere near their nuclear weapons as his dream was to denuclearize any nations where such proved possible starting with the United States. The idea was probably taken from the minds of some of the greatest planners whose desire was to put an end to nuclear weapons, or at least that was the title of their end of term thesis for their sophomore year term papers in university where President Obama must have gotten the plan that if the United States and the rest of NATO rid themselves of nuclear weapons the rest of the world would follow their example.

 

Recently Israel was privileged to feel the weight of such an attempt themselves. Before getting to the realities of President Obama and his plan to denuclearize the Middle East, in all fairness we must thank him for preventing yet another attempt by Israel’s helpful and friendly neighbors to take the first steps to a peaceful and nuclear free Middle East by passing a plan which would remove any nuclear weapons from Israel to allow their destruction thus permitting a nuclear free Middle East and an Israel without their sole deterrence against the use of chemical, biological or potentially nuclear weapons by Israel’s neighboring countries in a first strike assault which might very well destroy any residual ability of Israel to resist a combined assault. Thanks are due President Obama whose Ambassador to the United Nations Samantha Power for Vetoing the plan presented to denuclearize the Middle East by destroying the Israeli nuclear weapons providing such could be proven to exist while doing nothing to assure that Israel’s neighbors never produced such weapons, only forbidding Israel of possessing such weapons. The motion was struck down due to its inherently one-sided aims and wording. Such plans have been placed on hold by Israel’s neighbors as their former attempts to use military force alone proved insufficient to overrun Israel with conventional arms. Any plans Israel’s neighboring nations might have entertained for a chemical, biological or other WMD (Weapons of Mass Destruction) first round attack has been deterred by the stated policy the Israelis have let be known that their response to any such WMD first strike would immediately result in the complete destruction of the offending nation’s major cities and military instillations in a single devastating strike. This warning went hand-in-hand with the Israeli ambiguity about whether or not she had developed and produced nuclear weaponry. This has often been labelled the Israeli nukes in the basement policy which does not admit nor deny by Israeli officials as to whether Israel has a nuclear arsenal. It has been assumed for years that should Israel ever require such weapons that they could likely produce the required numbers in quick order, another way of claiming that Israel has the capability but it is unknown whether or not Israel had ever actually produced such weapons or simply made the necessary components but leaving them without their nuclear cores which would only be placed within these otherwise unusable weapons as necessary for their deployment. Quite a preposterous plan but whatever makes the rest of the world happy.

 

Still, this past week saw United States Assistant Secretary of State for International Security and Nonproliferation, Thomas Countryman, and a parade of supporting officials visit Israel with briefcases full of plans by which Israel could take the bold initial step and destroy her nuclear weapons as a demonstration of her good will and deep desire for a nuclear free Middle East. This plan was being forwarded by the same State Department overseeing the negotiations by the P5+1 and Iran which are designing a plan that might prevent Iran from developing and arming themselves with nuclear weapons at the latest in ten years. Are Israelis really supposed to believe that should they destroy their nuclear weapons, assuming such exist, in the hopes that Iran and the rest of the Muslim Middle East and North Africa (MENA) would simply forgo developing and building their own nuclear stockpiles? I think we all know where Israel formally declaring her possession of nuclear warheads and then destroying them immediately thereafter would lead and it is not a pretty sight. Let’s take a look at the MENA nations and visualize a realistic view of the MENA states. The currently most stable states would have to be Iran, Turkey, Saudi Arabia with the Gulf States and Egypt and both Saudi Arabia with the Gulf States and Egypt are teetering on the brink of full scale war. Jordan is stable for now with her northern neighbor, Syria, in complete meltdown, her easterly neighbor, Iraq, heading full speed to oblivion and ISIS sitting just off both those borders and in a full scale conquest of the Middle East in their future plans. Egypt is facing all-out war with the Muslim Brotherhood and al-Qaeda not to mention the failed state and ISIS breeding grounds to her west in the form of Libya. The Sudan and South Sudan are still in a state of turmoil and the rest of the nations in the region of the Horn of Africa in varying states of dysfunction. Heading west from there and you leave the warlords of Somalia behind and take up Boko Haram, not exactly a pretty picture. Yemen is falling before the Iranian proxy army of the Houthis while Saudi Arabia is battling to prevent Iran from basically taking up occupation of their southern border, a wise idea. Iran is perched to slowly stretch her tentacles across the Middle East as well as into South America, particularly Argentina, and in Venezuela as well as into Central America and into Mexico and from there infiltrate the rest of North America. Israel is about the sole island of peace and tranquility in the nations making up MENA and may be the only nation without any delusions or desires about controlling the world or just their region of the world but simply desires being permitted to live quietly within the borders promised her at the end of World War I, the war to end all wars. The problem Israel faces is the world desires her destruction by any means possible selling her down the river at a moment’s notice.

 

So, what did bring United States Assistant Secretary of State for International Security and Nonproliferation, Thomas Countryman, and supporting cast to Israeli shores? It appears that with their recently garnered agreement with Russia, the United States has chosen to attempt to design a nuclear-free Middle East starting where else, with Israel. Why does everything always begin with Israel, want regional peace, have Israel make the required sacrifices, want a nuclear free Middle East, start by forcing Israel to rid herself of her sole deterrence against the blood-stained hands of her neighboring nations. Want an Arab-Israeli peace treaty, have Israel surrender to every Arab demand and then there will be peace. In all things simply sacrifice Israel and all will be well. How about commit to the demands of International Law and enforce the treaties and then leave Israel out of your further plans and dreams, we are quite happy living between the Mediterranean and Jordan. We will face our terrorist forces in a manner even more careful and respecting the innocents behind and amongst who these bloodthirsty terrorists hide than other nations when they strike at terrorist forces. The State Department assault team brought with them the tried and proven false concept that an Israeli agreement to the idea of destroying her nuclear weapons would be a catalyst for the rest of the Middle East. Actually that would be a correct statement providing the catalyst Israel would be providing would be for a WMD assault on Israel preceding another all-out attempt by all those who could be marshalled to destroy Israel once again. For such an adventure even the Iranians would coordinate with the Saudis and Hezballah and ISIS would work in harmony until the end when they would once again turn their weapons on each other. The Israeli Foreign Minister’s office refused to make any comments to approaches by regular news agencies pointing out that Countryman’s visit and the items being debated are such that “the subject is a sensitive one, we will not talk about it.” No argument with that statement and such a position is a proper level of security with which to approach any such negotiations, especially such negotiations with the United States and the Obama Administration. Not only is the Israeli ownership of nuclear tipped ballistic missiles one which Israel treats with the most dogged ambiguity that probably the best idea would be silence.

 

But there are other problems arising with the Obama administration, some of which reared their ugly heads again this week as President Obama was touting his support amongst the American Jewish community as proof of his, kindnesses and strongly positive relations with Israel, a formidable idea lacking reality which puzzles many Israelis, especially those with relatives who continue to support President Obama. Speaking with the Atlantic’s Jeffrey Goldberg, President Obama stated that there is “not really a bifurcation with respect to the attitudes of the Jewish American community about me. I consistently received overwhelming majority support from the Jewish community, and even after all the publicity around the recent differences that I’ve had with Prime Minister Netanyahu, the majority of the Jewish American community still supports me, and supports me strongly.” Be that as it may, there is also no real bifurcation with respect to the attitudes of the Jewish Israeli community about President Obama and it is exactly the opposite as that he credits the American Jewish community. The President was not done weaving a woebegone tale attempting to fog reality by that old but true friend of American equivalence, comparing apples to oranges. The President went further stating, “But you can’t equate people of good will who are concerned about those issues with somebody who is hostile towards Israel. And you know, I actually believe that most American Jews, most Jews around the world, and most Jews in Israel recognize as much. And that’s part of the reason why I do still have broad-based support among American Jews. It’s not because they dislike Israel, it’s not because they aren’t worried about Iran having a nuclear weapon or what Hezbollah is doing in Lebanon. It’s because I think they recognize, having looked at my history and having seen the actions of my administration, that I’ve got Israel’s back, but there are values that I share with them that may be at stake if we’re not able to find a better path forward than what feels like a potential dead-end right now.”

 

The old-school of equating the views towards Israel between Israeli Jews and American Jews no longer flies. The vast majority of Zionist Jews have made Aliyah and are living in Israel and what remains of Jewish community in the United States and Europe as well are those Jews who will only move to Israel if they find themselves facing threats to their lives, and many would even ignore such as that claiming loudly that such cannot happen here as we are assimilated and are an integral part of the community. That was the exact claim made in Russia before the Czarist pogroms, in Germany and across Europe before the Nazis and their holocaust attempted genocide of European Jews and was said initially by many Russian Jews and other Jews trapped behind the Iron Curtain though coming on the heels of the Nazis the Communist destructive treatment of their Jews was more readily believed this time through as they had actually seen this before and recognized the steel fist inside a velvet glove. Truth is the blinders are back on the Jews in Europe and the Western World and even on a sizeable minority of Jews here in Israel who largely live in the more plush areas of Tel Aviv and its surrounding areas while the Jews in the exterior, the term for fly-over country in Israel where Tel Aviv is defined as the core and the ignorant masses who are not as sophisticated, educated, celebrated, refined and worldly as their betters, realize that the world is again turning to destroy the Jew, both the nations of the Jew, Israel, and the Jew wherever they reside. It appears as it may only be a period of time before the records of every person suspected of being a Jew has the records of their grandparents or even great-grandparents researched by some special committee in order to determine who are the Jews amongst their populations. In Europe it will be done right out in the open behind shaded windows through which nobody dares to peek while in the United States it will be done by checking the religion every suspect’s for-bearers gave upon arriving at Ellie Island or wherever their port of entry was or even when their first relatives arrived and this will be carried out by the Department of State and Homeland Security in the utmost of secure manners with only those who can be trusted performing such tasks. Meanwhile, every conceivable effort will be tried to bring Israel down to ruination weakening her before permitting her Arab neighbors to devour her eviscerated corpse denuded of the ability to fight as the IDF is denied the replacement parts to maintain their sophisticated weapons systems and denied the raw materials to forge her own replacements and new systems all the while arming her enemies with the latest and greatest weaponry conceivable. In the United States, where Israel has been brought into reliance for arms, there will be an extra layer of approval required for any military shipment or dual use provisions where as in the Gaza operations Protective Edge the State Department was required to approve any arms resupply before they could be dispatched, a whole new layer put in place by President Obama such that resupply would be delayed until after the fighting was completed. Had the fight continued long enough Israel could have been weakened sufficiently that Hamas might have overrun Israel almost without outside assistance. It may become desired policy in the United States in the near future should the anti-Semitism, anti-Israelism and anti-Zionism continue its meteoric rise and then Israel may have nowhere to turn for assistance and be put in the predicament of resupplying herself from that point forward.

 

Lastly, President Obama spoke at a Washington D.C. Synagogue of Adas Israel. The President relied on the old bromides claiming to be, “an honorary member of the tribe.” and that “my commitment to Israel’s security is and always will be unshakeable. The people of Israel must always know America has its back, and America will always have its back.” And so on. President Obama gave his stock untruths about how his efforts will make the world, especially Israel, safe from any Iranian nuclear threats. His statement which received the strongest applause was, “I feel a responsibility to speak out honestly about what I think will lead to long-term security and to the preservation of a true democracy in the Jewish homeland.” One can only wonder if by preserving the Israeli democracy that included his dispatching of many of his own campaign’s organizers and staff to attempt and prevent the reelection of Prime Minister Netanyahu. He also gave strong supportive comments for the two state solution, an effort which has been murdered beyond any potential to be revived by Mahmoud Abbas and the rest of the Fatah, Hamas, Palestinian Authority and other Arab leadership. All the while as he spoke President Obama knew that he had State Department staff and Assistant Secretary of State for International Security and Nonproliferation, Thomas Countryman in Israel pressuring the government and military to allow for the United States to cover Israel with their nuclear blanket while Israel dismantled and destroyed her own nuclear weapons whose opaque existence has likely saved Israel from chemical or biological attacks. This was the concurrent effort of having Israel’s back meant though the congregants in the predominantly Democrat liberal progressive neighborhood surrounding Washington D.C. who largely value their stock portfolios over the safety of Israel, a population which voted by large majorities for Obama in both elections gave President Obama the same cover that the dwindling Jewish presence in Iran gives the Ayatollah Ali Hosseini Khamenei cover as not being an anti-Semite, simply being troubled by the government in Israel, a statement which numerous Iranians leaders have made while the old and venerable Head Rabbi stands silently at their side presumably by his own choice. The difference is that there is a large Jewish community supporting President Obama but many, as we can attest to from our years living amongst such Jews before relocating to the friendlier and vibrant Jewish communities which make up Israel, have more concern for their status-symbol lives than the continued existence of Israel. The Jewish communities in the United States with very few exceptions are moribund and weighted towards an elderly congregation as the youth have largely intermarried or assimilated to where their Jewishness is at best going to high holiday services and having some semblance of a Seder in their homes most Passovers while also sporting the Chanukah Bush which resembles its close cousin, the Christmas tree in every way, shape and form. Jewish life in this world depends on Israel and without Israel it will die within two generations which is why Israel is important, and not just to the Jews but to the world in ways and means measured in intangible and esoteric means impossible to describe with any justice here. Perhaps some day we will attempt such an explanation though this is far from a promise, just something we wish we were anywhere near capable of doing such justice. Even the Rabbis we have met tell of this promise of having Jews in the world enhancing so many areas in so many detectable and hidden ways that the inventions and discoveries become a minor side of these effects. Until then simply remain aware that Israel is vital if there are to be such as Jews and their influences to make a better world for all to remain that force for goodness.

 

Beyond the Cusp

 

May 22, 2015

Obsessed Appeasement Expropriators Descend

Filed under: Israel,Middle East,Palestinian,Palestinian Authority,West Bank,Gaza,Jews,Muslims,Administration,Peace Process,United Nations,Politics,Egypt,Mubarak,Islam,United States,Terror,Arab League,Europe,European Union,Judea,Khartoum Conference,Media,BBC,AFP,Jerusalem,Disengagement,Mahmoud Abbas,Zionist,Arabs,Palestinian Legislative Committee,Anti-Israel,1967 War,Naqba,Anti-Zionist,Ehud Barak,Islam,Arab World,History,Oslo Accords,Anti-Semitism,1949 Armistice Line,PLO,Old City,Jewish Leadership,Government,Meaning of Peace,Saeb Erekat,Hate,Third Intifada,Muslim World,Civilization,Menachem Begin,Madeline Albright,Yasser Arafat,Temple Mount,Taqiyya,Intifada,Condemning Israel,24/7 News Reporting,Mainstream Media,Politicized Findings,Haaretz,Statehood,Amalekites,European Governments,Judean Hills,Two State Solution,One State Solution,Blood Libel,Catholic,Catholic Churh,Catholic Institutions,Pope,Jewish State,Zionism,Absolutism,Executive Order,Green Line,Israeli Capital City,Camp David Peace Accords,War of Independence,Prime Minister,Jordan River,Taqiyya,Sharia,Appointment,Cabinet,Land for Peace,Jewish Heritage,Islamist,Promised Land,Three No's,AP,Appeasement,World Opinion,World Pressures,International Politics,Foreign NGOs,Domestic NGOs,Foreign Funding,Divided Jerusalem,Fox,Mediterranean Sea,Ramallah,United States Pressure,Fatwa,Dhimmi,Jihad,Forced Solution,Pressure by Egyptian People,Israeli Media,European Council,European Pressure,Conflict Avoidnce,Appease Islamic Interests,Internal Pressures,Security,Six Day War,United Nations Presures,Intifada,Palestinian Pressures,Arab Appeasement,Rome,Islamic Pressure,European Media,Israeli Interests,CNN,Secular Interests,Leftist Pressures,Federica Mogherini,Battle of Khaybar,Resolution,Non Binding Resolution,Arab Authority,Coverup,Celebrate Terrorism,Benyamin Netanyahu,Nationalist Pressures,European Union’s High Representative for Foreign Affairs,Anwar Sadat — qwertster @ 2:12 AM
Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

 

The circus which accompanies the establishing of a new Israeli government finally formed after any elections cycle, planned or unexpected, comes this time in force beyond imagination. Usually there is coordination resulting in a single team arriving all carrying briefcases brimming with demands for new sacrifices Israel will be expected to make simply to allow these experts to meet with Mahmoud Abbas and his minions and receive another list of demands that Israel submit in order to attain a humbled attitude considered suitable for a meeting an Arab Palestinian delegations whose diplomacy is more insults and degradations than hospitable intercourse which usually accompanies normative mediations. This time the demands will be presented in surround sound as teams from the United States, the anticipatory fomenters, the United Nations, the European Union who come salivating for Israel’s destruction, and an outside agitator granting audience and treaties recognizing Mahmoud Abbas as the maker and seeker of peace granting him every comfort and recognition of his nightmarish nation without setting borders permitting Abbas to define as he desires. All these messengers bleat tired and tortured phrases which have been repeated for over twenty years to a point where they no longer have any real meaning. The most basic of these entreaties is the demand that Israel make some great offer which might ingratiate Israelis in the eyes of the leaders of the Arab Palestinians who already have proven their desire for peace as they have repeatedly asked for any and all these parties to intervene and plead their case in order that they might finally be granted the peace they so desperately desire. The problem is nobody has ever bothered to research and inquire of the Arab Palestinians exactly what their concept of an acceptable peace would require and what the Israelis might be required to sacrifice and perform in order for this peace to finally be attainable. Perhaps that might someday be the first step for these angels for peace who will be descending upon Israel to once again bless Israeli sacrifices even to the point of suicidal dispensations as a first step towards appeasement of the Arab unarticulated demands for peace.

 

As Israel has already offered the Arabs as much as 95% of Judea and Samaria, detached from their Jewish history by Jordan renaming the area to West Bank, all of Gaza, which is already in Arab hands since the disengagement in 2005, and all of East Jerusalem back in 2000 and again in 2002, both times with exchange of properties and lands to equate the final 5% of land and both times the Arab leadership simply walked out of the negotiations without even making a counter offer, demands for adjustment or any commentary, just refusing in the most impolite and insulting manner possible, silent dismissal as if such an offer were an insult. Perhaps the United States, United Nations, and European Union could, as long as the whole representation of the Western World and beyond are represented, take a different initial step and instead of starting with Israel take a stroll to Ramallah and simply inquire as to exactly what the Arab Palestinian leaders would demand of Israel in order to establish a fair and mutually acceptable and equally beneficial entertaining equal sacrifices and accommodations and once the great leaders who claim they are only in the Middle East to facilitate peace can finally establish the desired demands for a final settlement from Abbas and company and then perhaps there can be some fair and egalitarian resolution with both sides finally reaching a meeting of their minds. Somehow we here at Beyond the Cusp suspect that such a meeting would be revealing as the Arab leadership would either refuse to speak in specifics and decline to even approach a map, let alone speak of borders or perhaps they might surprise the world and actually state their actual demand, all of Israel with the Jews removed by any means necessary including another holocaust. Should the delegations from the United Nations, European Union and United States actually manage to gain a potentially acceptable offer from Mahmoud Abbas and the rest of the leadership which might be in any way presentable to the Israelis, then finally the crux of the real problem might finally be brought into the light. The reason that all the demands are always placed on Israel and never on the Arabs is because of a basic truth, the Israelis have proven their desire for peace while the Arabs have only proven their desire to destroy Israel by any means possible. History has shown this truth to the point that it is beyond the ability of any fair and honest observer to avoid, but these presumed messengers for peace are anything but fair or honest, they are coconspirators in the Arab conspiracy to destroy Israel and, if possible, the entirety of the Jewish People. The one thing which has become obvious is that should Israel fail and its population destroyed, then the potential future of the Jewish faith would be relegated to a near oblivion with small cores of religious Jews holding on to what would otherwise be a dead faith.

 

This was an integral and clearly stated goal by the Arab League and in the Khartoum Resolution of September 1, 1967 where the three no’s became the resolute avenue in the pursuit of the destruction of the Jewish State. The actual resolution which can be read here set forth what became known as the three no’s which stated that the Arab states would observe no formal peace treaty and no direct negotiations and no recognition of Israel. This agreement was broken only once when President Anwar Sadat of Egypt negotiated and reached a peace accord with Israel’s President Menachem Begin in what was the Camp David Accords ending the state of war between Egypt and Israel as of September 17, 1978. For breaking the three no’s Anwar Sadat paid with his life as he was assassinated on October 6, 1981, just over three years after reaching a peace with Israel when during the annual victory celebration he was shot along with a vast number of people in the formal reviewing stands including eleven others killed outright or suffered fatal wounds, including the Cuban ambassador to Egypt, an Omani general, and a Coptic Orthodox bishop and twenty-eight were wounded, including Vice President Hosni Mubarak, Irish Defense Minister James Tully, and four US military liaison officers. These three no’s have been observed via a specific series of accommodations and variations allowing for skirting the letter while accommodating the spirit of the Khartoum Resolution. The compliance to the three no’s of the Khartoum Resolution and the rest of its stipulations is behind the complete refusal of the Arabs to reach a peace despite the Israelis having at least twice meeting or exceeding the demands relayed by Yasser Arafat to President William Jefferson Clinton during the negotiations in Paris where Israeli President Ehud Barak which upon being told that the Israeli President had agreed to meet the conditions for peace even to splitting Jerusalem right along the Green Line boundary from before the 1967 Six Day War where Israel had liberated Jerusalem along with Judea and Samaria from Jordanian occupation he simply walked out refusing to even make a responding additional demand straight to his awaiting car which he had arranged to make ready just in the case that the Israelis might actually make the sacrifices he had thought beyond acceptable. Arafat showed no surprise likely because he realized that President Clinton might actually convince Israeli President Barak that this was the best chance for peace and the Israelis would make the necessary sacrifice for peace and so he knew he would need to beat a hasty prearranged retreat so as not to be caught in a compromised position and have to actually sign an agreement. It was the awaiting vehicle with the motor running and the driver at the wheel allowing Yasser Arafat to make his get-away before Secretary of State Madeline Albright could catch up with him and corner him demanding an explanation. Arafat was on his jet back to Jordan within an hour avoiding any potential interception by President Clinton and never did Arafat ever make an explanation to the American President. So, let these angels of peace alight on their gentle wings and draw from Mahmoud Abbas a specific description of what he would demand in order to make peace. When he refuses to make the same potentially problematic misstep made by Yasser Arafat and actually deceive these merchants of peace and give a response which he is assured in his mind the Israelis would never make such sacrifice for peace because he learned from the Arafat embarrassment of turning down the exact stipulations laid out for peace because the Israeli desire for peace actually made them stretch to their breaking-point in order to have peace, so Abbas will never present what he demands for peace because to do so would reveal that the Arabs do not want peace, they desire Israel’s extermination and nothing less.

 

Beyond the Cusp

 

May 21, 2015

United Nations Rushing Down Same Dead End Peace Process

Filed under: Israel,Middle East,Palestinian,Palestinian Authority,West Bank,Jews,Muslims,President Obama,Administration,Peace Process,Netanyahu,United Nations,United States,Terror,Arab League,Europe,European Union,Samaria,Judea,Khartoum Conference,Media,BBC,AFP,Agency France Press,Jerusalem,Mahmoud Abbas,Zionist,Arabs,Partition Plan,San Remo Conference,Jewish,Anti-Israel,1967 War,Anti-Zionist,Settlements,Right of Return,1967 Borders,Islam,Sharia Law,Arab World,History,Promised Land,Anti-Semitism,1949 Armistice Line,Jerusalem Day,PLO,Old City,Hate,Islamic State,Third Intifada,Muslim World,Civilization,Tribe,Temple Mount,Taqiyya,Intifada,Mainstream Media,Politicized Findings,Haaretz,Statehood,Calaphate,Pre-Conditions,Amalekites,Rocket Attacks,Rock Throwing,Response to Terrorism,Al-Jazeera,European Governments,Islamists,Defend Israel,Support Israel,Blood Libel,Catholic,Catholic Churh,Catholic Institutions,Pope,Jewish State,Recognize Israel,Talking Heads,Zionism,Submission,Executive Order,Green Line,Jewish Home,Israeli Capital City,War of Independence,Threat of War,Victims,Arabist,Land for Peace,Jewish Heritage,Television News,Government Controlled Media,Media Censorship,Media Bias,Misreporting,Palestinian Media,Failed State,Three No's,AP,Associated Press,Appeasement,World Opinion,World Pressures,International Politics,Foreign NGOs,Domestic NGOs,Foreign Funding,Equality,Equal Rights,Equal Treatment,Divided Jerusalem,Fox,United States Pressure,Ditherer in Chief,Palestinian Liberation Organization,Jihad,Forced Solution,Judaism,Murder Israelis,Israeli Media,European Council,European Pressure,Omission,France Channel 2,Conflict Avoidnce,Appease Islamic Interests,Security,Six Day War,United Nations Presures,Palestinian Pressures,World Media,Arab Appeasement,Islamic Pressure,European Media,Israeli Interests,France 24,CNN,Media Intimidation,Secular Interests,Leftist Pressures,Federica Mogherini,Resolution,Binding Resolution,Arab Authority,Coverup,Benyamin Netanyahu,European Union’s High Representative for Foreign Affairs,European Historic Anti Semitism — qwertster @ 3:01 AM
Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

 

The United Nations wasted no time in assaulting Israel in the name of peace. The new United Nations special Middle East coordinator, Nickolay Mladenov, told the Security Council that “the coming period will be critical to the future of the peace process.” Allow me to interpret and translate United Nations speak to understandable English. The ‘coming period’ means that the process will be implemented every time we hit a snag in the negotiations. There will be no deviation from this tried and failed set of methodology and the same step by step onto failure as it has been, leading to a new ‘coming period’ which will be the same initiation each time there is a snag and starting anew demanding yet more Israeli concessions.

 

Now we come to the words, ‘will be critical to the future’ which will be the demands placed upon Israel to sacrifice by releasing more terrorists and relegating lands for a future Arab State and even unseen new demands and destructions will be demanded of Israel. The next phrase is ‘the future’ which will be the demand to allow all of Jerusalem be placed into the hands of an international committee overseen very likely through Rome or the European Union. It matters little which titular head will be perceived as the court jester who will wilt before Arab pressure as they assault the International City of Jerusalem and, as has been the rule before, all those tasked to keep Jerusalem as an international city and specifically tasked to guard against Israeli offences will flee to Israel seeking protection before fleeing back to Europe or New York while the Arabs take all of Jerusalem and Israel is warned to stand down and not take any counter steps as doing so would only make the situation in danger of exploding, and nobody wants to see explosions, especially if Israel is causing any of them.

 

And finally we reach the magic words, ‘of the peace process’ which are the magic trump cards which are always deployed as a bludgeon Israel. This is a cover-all which is utilized most when communicating what the new next demand to be made of Israel in order to be permitted a meeting with Abbas. The meeting with Abbas will have long discussions where new United Nations special Middle East coordinator, Nickolay Mladenov, and his advisors and other members of the team will be posing questions and offering proposals all the while there may be an occasional comment from the Arab Palestinian team members while Abbas continues his normal bobble-head performance as we described yesterday in The Uninterpretable Faces of Mahmoud Abbas in greater detail of his technique of never allowing anybody to pin him to having made a comment or any sign or inclination towards accepting any deal or terms proffered. If the negotiations ever make it to this point they will have reached levels thus far unattainable. Even making this progress is of no value as at any point Abbas could have one of his team question some point from anywhere in the entire trail which has been painfully tread in the process. This is an usual argument and negotiation where they will proceed and appear to be making progress as they collect Israeli concessions and now jump back days, weeks or months or even bring up some technical point from some former negotiations and drag the team back even to the very beginning of the negotiations. Meanwhile the Arab negotiators will demand that the United Nations team make sure that Israel gives up every last point which were even slightly referenced during the negotiations and will demand that they refuse to ever discuss the next step until Israel had met every demand made by the Arabs. That is when ‘future of the peace process’ process is trotted out and Israel is then demanded to surrender to every demand mentioned during the negotiations or talks made on the side of the talks in the absence of Israel where the United Nations agree to force concessions out of the Israelis.

 

There will be several obstacles placed to force the talks to stumble, utilizing these to push a reset taking the negotiations back to square one. Fortunately, we will not repeat translating every clause in the initial statement though those wishing to may do so, just return to the top of the article. Many of us who have tortured themselves and followed any of the former Arab-Israeli negotiations are fully aware that the basic formula is force Israel to meet, though they often call it comply making it appear that every Israeli concession as if it was a required and an obligation freely agreed upon by the Israelis but are often simply demands made by the Arabs and fully backed by the Europeans, United Nations, and lately the President of the United States.

 

Recently Professor Gerald Steinberg, president of NGO Monitor, commenting on a study recently released covering the European Union policy paper displaying the European Union’s flawed assessment and understanding of Israeli society and positions towards reaching peace with their Arab neighbors. This study being released immediately before European Union’s High Representative for Foreign Affairs Federica Mogherini’s visit to the Middle East to meet with both the new Israeli leaders of the recently elected government and with Mahmoud Abbas and his fellow kleptocrats who have missed standing for election remaining in office for over a dozen years of their elected four year terms may give her reason to renew efforts for a more balanced study. In the European Union’s External Action Service 2014 Israel ENP Progress report, displayed the European Union’s relying almost exclusively on anti-Israel NGOs ignoring any actions or reports by or about the Israeli side neutrally or, Heavens forbid, friendly report. NGO Monitor found the report was so biased and slanted against Israel and had completely ignored any Arab attacks, rioting or other transgressions committed by the Arab Palestinians in their consistent war of aggressive attritions in their efforts to force the Jews to give up and simply leave. Thus far this has largely failed which may have a little something to do with the description the Jews were labeled with in Torah as being a stiff-necked and stubborn people. This description was made by Moses when attempting to make excuses for general transgressions against the covenant and other whining and complaints which came from the people at every difficulty or delay. I can attest that many Jews have not changed on the stubborn and stiff necked part but mostly more compliant to the covenant and commandments in Torah. The end result of the NGO Monitor report suggested for the European Union’s High Representative for Foreign Affairs Federica Mogherini to finally attempt to make some adjustments in the European reports possibly making them far more realistic. We are not betting that any such changes will be forthcoming from the European Union and Federica Mogherini will blindly follow the report and once again make all her demands for peace to be attained on Israeli leaders’ heads while simply agreeing with every demand made by the Arabs. Some leopards cannot change their spots and the Europeans cannot avoid their anti-Semitism. Fortunately there are some in Europe who have attempted to make changes and fight the unending trend to fall into the old habits of Jew hatreds but they are facing a monumental challenge and a severe and steep uphill slog before any progress. The recent moves by the Vatican and Pope Francis definitely were in complete agreement with the European Union reports and the basic reviews given by almost every European financed NGO, especially the government and Vatican financed organizations which operate in or about Israel. The United Nations can be included in with the Europeans except the United Nations, especially with their Durban Conferences which appear to be planned into the future to reinforce the Israel and the Jews are the reason for every ill of society, nations, continent, planet, solar system, galaxy or possibly universe, after all, Stephen Hawking has joined the Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions Movement (BDS Movement). Who’s next?

 

Beyond the Cusp

 

Next Page »

The Rubric Theme. Create a free website or blog at WordPress.com.